buctootim Posted 3 December, 2013 Posted 3 December, 2013 (edited) Stunning... ...and all that, but what's the point? He could have saved a lot of time by just using the Ipad to take a photo. If he'd stopped at 1.03, that was when the picture looked best imo. Edited 3 December, 2013 by buctootim
110_Persaint Posted 3 December, 2013 Posted 3 December, 2013 Why wasn't I taught this in my computer graphics and image processing courses?? Amazing...
The9 Posted 4 December, 2013 Posted 4 December, 2013 Utter waste of time. I'm also extremely cynical that he didn't just use a variety of different automatically rendered images at the various stages, reverse the process, i.e. start with a finished image and mess it up, and then play the video backwards.
Barry Sanchez Posted 4 December, 2013 Posted 4 December, 2013 Should have done Karl Howman. I got it.
saintbletch Posted 4 December, 2013 Author Posted 4 December, 2013 ...and all that, but what's the point? He could have saved a lot of time by just using the Ipad to take a photo. If he'd stopped at 1.03, that was when the picture looked best imo. You philistinian luddite BTT! Here's one of Leo's early drafts...Should've stopped there. Utter waste of time. I'm also extremely cynical that he didn't just use a variety of different automatically rendered images at the various stages, reverse the process, i.e. start with a finished image and mess it up, and then play the video backwards. Hmm. Good point!
buctootim Posted 4 December, 2013 Posted 4 December, 2013 You philistinian luddite BTT! Here's one of Leo's early drafts...Should've stopped there. Thanks Bletch!. I've always loved Leo Sayers early work as it happens!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now