Too few attacking options on the bench?

[icehagman]

As the thread title say: Isn´t it a bit defensive of Poch to have Three defenders on the bench? I mean, it should not come as a surprise that we, in a game versus Chelsea, at some stage might find ourselves one goal down and will have to set for a more attacking tactic.

 

Yes, both Lambert and Davis entered the game, but i would have liked to have more attacking players available on the bench, in case we need to put more pressure up front. I Think there is a waste of space on the bench to have two central defenders and Chambers there.

 

At today´s game it would not have made a big difference though as both Davis and Lambert did come on, as did Gazzanigga, but in case we did not have to change goalie we could not have made a substitution anyway that had made us a more potent attacking side...

[doggface]

Ramirez not even on the bench is crazy at best (unless we have agreed a deal)

[Wiggles31]

We really lack a player who can thread that final ball. By far our biggest problem this season.

[Berkshire Saint]

Ramirez should be on the bench at least really. I know it's not a particularly fashionable view on here but I'm not sure he really was all that bad last season? Certainly not so bad to fall out favour as spectacularly as he has done this season!

[Wade Garrett]

There must be more to Ramirez not even being on the bench.

 

Maybe a deal has been done.

[Barry Sanchez]

There must be more to Ramirez not even being on the bench.

 

Maybe a deal has been done.

 

I hope so, awful and woeful and who signed him?