Jump to content

Hoddle's hypocrisy


farawaysaint

Recommended Posts

What a preposterous man he is. Suddenly Michael Owen, David Beckham and Paul Scholes represent "mercurial" talent that other England managers wouldn't have picked? Yeah, of course.

 

Well, at least Hoddle makes himself easy to despise. It really takes very little effort to hate the man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hoddle was so good at bringing talented players into the England squad. So good that Matt Le Tiss couldn't get a place in 98, even after his hat trick against Russia

 

That is worthy of being posted as a comment on the actual article itself.

 

A well aimed & executed Bullseye Prof

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fair point asking why AL wasn't "spotted" earlier. Which TBH I think we all know the answer to - Duh League 1

 

But he writes SOOOO egotistically.

God, & to think someone on here advocated him as the second coming

 

Easy mistake to make as he clearly thinks he is.

 

what a conceited knob (hoddle not Phil )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lets be fair to Hoddle , he wasnt the only one that didnt pick MLT

 

There was also mr vegatable as . but they were part of the same club and they both probably were acting like spoilt school girls because Matt decided not to join the spuds

 

Hoddle is hypocritical for a lot of reasons but his is deision not to select Matt was one of the biggest and now that been confirmed by the the lallana article PR***

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amazed there's a thread on Hoddle and no sign of Dalek yet!

 

Grateful to Hoddle for seeing us to the new stadium and raising aspirations a bit, not that keen on him as a person though and his rumoured arrogance still seems undiminished. Felt sorry for MLT at the time and it crushed Matt's spirit for the last 3 or 4 seasons of his career and finished comparatively young although Matt's fitness probably didn't help. With MP's fitness regimes, imagine how awesome MLT would be in this current Saints team? If you look at what some players go for in the transfer market now, you'd be lucky to get change from £40m if one of the top 4 wanted to buy him and even that might be too low. With Morgan, Victor and others providing the platform, he'd have also got a bucketload of England caps. Let's be honest, he kept squads of largely Championship, League 1 and League 2 players in a top flight for most of the 1990s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amazed there's a thread on Hoddle and no sign of Dalek yet!

 

Grateful to Hoddle for seeing us to the new stadium and raising aspirations a bit, not that keen on him as a person though and his rumoured arrogance still seems undiminished. Felt sorry for MLT at the time and it crushed Matt's spirit for the last 3 or 4 seasons of his career and finished comparatively young although Matt's fitness probably didn't help. With MP's fitness regimes, imagine how awesome MLT would be in this current Saints team? If you look at what some players go for in the transfer market now, you'd be lucky to get change from £40m if one of the top 4 wanted to buy him and even that might be too low. With Morgan, Victor and others providing the platform, he'd have also got a bucketload of England caps. Let's be honest, he kept squads of largely Championship, League 1 and League 2 players in a top flight for most of the 1990s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At face value he makes a lot of good, truthful points.

 

But his hypocrisy in saying England should pick more talented players more often, when he was solely responsible for not picking Matt Le Tiss, and, let us not forget, Gazza, for the 1998 World Cup squad, is remarkable.

 

Also, bailing on Saints in 2000 doesn't help his cause on here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hoddle is a grade A pillock and a big head, however he did a pretty good job at Saints and tactically he was on the ball. He also did an ok job for England, in fact the performance away in Italy was one of the best tactical displays I've seen in 40 years of watching England. If he hadn't been such a plum, he could of been a pretty decent international manager. As a player he was class, and should have won a load more caps.

 

Which leads on to the MLT debate. The man who should be in the dock over Matt is not Hoddle, but Terry Venables. It was Venables who was in charge of England when Matt was at his peak,not Hoddle. Hoddle actually brought him back into the fold, when his club form wasn't that great. Hoddle gave him a chance in an important qualifier, Venables didn't. In hindsight im sure Hoddle would admit it was a mistake to give Matt a run in the B team,.as he clearly was never going to take him no matter what he did, and his form was not great that season. Venables kept him out when he was the best damn player in the league.

 

One question I would throw in is this; had Matt worked as hard as SRL and Adam, had he a lifestyle like that pair, would he have won more caps? Ricky appears to have had similar refuelling methods as Matt in the past and seemed to carry a bit of timber, Matt seemed to have the attitude "this is who I am" whereas Ricky appears to have knuckled down and become more professional, and is now reaping the rewards.Could Matt of achieved more had he looked after himself better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He left Chris Sutton out of the England squad because he would not play for the England B team saying that it was a gateway to the full England team. Matt then scores a hatrick and hits the bar and he ignores him.

 

He gave Matt 45minutes against Italy and then substituted him.

 

Unbelievable.

 

It' was a bit longer than that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He has used AL as the example, but to me AL was called up to the England first squad at the right time. His form wasn't the best last season and prior to that he was playing outside the prem. Now his form is hot and his confidence is high and we have a couple of decent friendlies to try out new players. The disconnect with AL and England has been at lower level, he was never fancied there by Stuart Peace and the others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hoddle was one of the best managers Saints had and the stats prove it. Had we appointed him in 2004 it is highly likely our unbroken run in the top league would have continued.
i will bite Dalek.

yes there were some real pearlers 7-1 away to Spurs 4-3 against Tranmere after being 3 up. The way he walked on us as we were preparing to go to our new stadium, when we needed stability. He gave us the end of one season and part of the following one, therefore it is hard to really quantify how good he really was. i do recall he left just beofre a really difficult run of games. Anyway i am very glad he did what he did as we may not have had the years that followed and not the Liebherrs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i will bite Dalek.

yes there were some real pearlers 7-1 away to Spurs 4-3 against Tranmere after being 3 up. The way he walked on us as we were preparing to go to our new stadium, when we needed stability. He gave us the end of one season and part of the following one, therefore it is hard to really quantify how good he really was. i do recall he left just beofre a really difficult run of games. Anyway i am very glad he did what he did as we may not have had the years that followed and not the Liebherrs

 

It would be the equivalent of Pochettino doing a bunk to manage Newell's Old Boys now, having only played 3 of the top half, actually.

 

As for your sliding doors theory, I'm almost as justified in saying "had he stayed, we'd have won the World Club Championship in 2003 and the last ten Champions Leagues". One thing changes, it all changes - but why settle for only being 3rd after years of crapness, have to pay to park in the car park for 15 minutes and having lost to Norwich already? Go large! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a pr*ck.

 

Sod you Dalek, I am glad that egotistical tw*t never came back. Its even worth 7 years in the minor leagues.

 

I am surprised at you Alpine. You may have strong views but you rarely personalise things. I have never made an argument in favour of Hoddle's personality or character, but have simply stated that he was a good manager and would surely have been a preferred choice to Sturrock, who was a complete disaster and started the rot leading to our eventual downfall.

As for people saying they would take our 7 years in the minor league over Hoddle, crazy, although at least you are tacitly admitting that the failure to appoint Hoddle was a large cause of our downfall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be the equivalent of Pochettino doing a bunk to manage Newell's Old Boys now, having only played 3 of the top half, actually.

 

As for your sliding doors theory, I'm almost as justified in saying "had he stayed, we'd have won the World Club Championship in 2003 and the last ten Champions Leagues". One thing changes, it all changes - but why settle for only being 3rd after years of crapness, have to pay to park in the car park for 15 minutes and having lost to Norwich already? Go large! :D

 

Yes you are right, of course no one for sure can say what would have happened had we appointed Hoddle. However, we do know what happened by failing to appoint Hoddle and it is hard to argue that he could have done quite such a bad job as Sturrock !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hoddle was one of the best managers Saints had and the stats prove it.

 

it is hard to argue that he could have done quite such a bad job as Sturrock !

 

Stats prove that too, I assume.

 

Paul Sturrock's record at Southampton: Won 5, Drawn 2, Lost 6. Total games: 13, total points: 17.

 

Not saying he was perfect, blameless or whatever but those are the stats, so yes it probably was quite possible to do such a bad job as Sturrock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hoddle was so good at bringing talented players into the England squad. So good that Matt Le Tiss couldn't get a place in 98, even after his hat trick against Russia

 

Exactly, could not believe what I was reading considering who wrote it, quite staggering, if bull sxxt was music he would have a brass band.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stats prove that too, I assume.

 

Paul Sturrock's record at Southampton: Won 5, Drawn 2, Lost 6. Total games: 13, total points: 17.

 

Not saying he was perfect, blameless or whatever but those are the stats, so yes it probably was quite possible to do such a bad job as Sturrock.

 

So if Sturrock was so good, why did he get the push ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yet many ex England players claimed he was a great England manager and a very good tactician.

 

I would go along with most of that, but his article does not ring quite true, however, and I may have to be corrected here, but did MLT change his mind at the 11th hour about joining Chelsea when Hoddle was manager for them; that may have had a beaing on his decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was replaced by Wigley, so it wasn't planned.

 

Wigley, by the way, W3 D6 L8 with the exact same squad, significantly worse than Sturrock.

 

No it wasn't planned, things had deteriorated so rapidly that Sturrock had to go as he had allegedly 'lost the dressing room'. The talk was that the players had wanted and expected the much more respected Hoddle, but the board panicked due to a demonstration by a vocal minority of Saints fans,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would go along with most of that, but his article does not ring quite true, however, and I may have to be corrected here, but did MLT change his mind at the 11th hour about joining Chelsea when Hoddle was manager for them; that may have had a beaing on his decision.

 

Even bigger w@nker then, not picking MLT to avenge some ancient slight.

 

No it wasn't planned, things had deteriorated so rapidly that Sturrock had to go as he had allegedly 'lost the dressing room'. The talk was that the players had wanted and expected the much more respected Hoddle, but the board panicked due to a demonstration by a vocal minority of Saints fans,

 

just because we were the minority it doesn't mean we were wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...