Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Goals conceded apart (easily explained by the skewing of fixtures against the top half teams for Adkins' spell compared to Pochettino), those stats are barely different from under Adkins and any variation could be explained by sample size and standard deviation. It's a hell of a leap to show that part of Saints' "long ball" game is to take advantage of un-set defences (true of pressing), when a quick look at the actual "long passes" shows that around half of the "long balls" are entirely within our own half.

 

2013%2f10%2fPochettino-vs-Adkins.jpg

 

Other than the accuracy of the statement that stats in football are underdeveloped and often fail to show cause, the only thing I thought was notable about the article is the phrase "Southampton’s front four press quickly, in clear formation: one going to the ball, two backing him up and a fourth looking fill space and pounce if the ball gets through the initial wave." I hadn't noticed such a clearly defined "method" to the press and will look out for it... in the matches where we bother to press at all.

Edited by The9
Posted

Interesting article although people have quoted stats to suggest Victor's passing is good. Disputes what my own eyes tell me.

Posted

And assume the overall rating is out of 10 so don't get why MP's rating is just slightly less than 2% more than NA as stats much better esp points gained.

Posted
Goals conceded apart (easily explained by the skewing of fixtures against the top half teams for Adkins' spell compared to Pochettino), those stats are barely different from under Adkins and any variation could be explained by sample size and standard deviation. It's a hell of a leap to show that part of Saints' "long ball" game is to take advantage of un-set defences (true of pressing), when a quick look at the actual "long passes" shows that around half of the "long balls" are entirely within our own half.

 

2013%2f10%2fPochettino-vs-Adkins.jpg

fill space and pounce if the ball gets through the initial wave." I hadn't noticed such a clearly defined "method" to the press and

Posted

33 points versus 22 is a big difference. When you consider MP has faced Chelsea, Liverpool (twice), United, City, Arsenal and Everton in his games in charge, it's not fair to say it's all down to quality of opposition.

Posted (edited)

that cant be right. we were all free scoring, free flowing under adkins

 

 

the9, havent they pretty much played against the same teams, rather than the stats being 'skewed'?

obviously, we are not going to press every team...

Edited by Batman
Posted

Nigel Adkins was only in charge for twenty two games? Seemed longer.

 

What was the name of that geezer that took us to two successive promotions?

Posted
Nigel Adkins was only in charge for twenty two games? Seemed longer.

 

What was the name of that geezer that took us to two successive promotions?

cant remember

Posted
Nigel Adkins was only in charge for twenty two games? Seemed longer.

 

What was the name of that geezer that took us to two successive promotions?

 

So you think a comparison of games against Walsall, Rochdale with games against Man City, Utd would be less flawed?

Posted
So you think a comparison of games against Walsall, Rochdale with games against Man City, Utd would be less flawed?

 

Did I say that? Just don't like the inference that our being in the top flight is/was a foregone conclusion, and Adkins reduced to the role of a 22-game failure.

Posted

Interesting. I think we break way to slowly & Swansea showed us what we should be doing. The long balls they played were often out wide to Dyer & Routledge. Can you imagine if we still had Oxlade Chamberlain?? In the side for Davis or Jay Rod on the left. Could then rotate with Lallana.

Posted
Interesting. I think we break way to slowly & Swansea showed us what we should be doing. The long balls they played were often out wide to Dyer & Routledge. Can you imagine if we still had Oxlade Chamberlain?? In the side for Davis or Jay Rod on the left. Could then rotate with Lallana.

 

If we wanted fast wide men we would have bought them, we didn't so we don't. As I said yesterday for all their speedy wide play Swansea still lost 2-0. Everybody tackles, everybody presses in our system, do Dyer and Routledge do that ? I've no idea. Dyer looked handy because he was up against Fox, maybe against Shaw he'd have looked less useful.

Posted
Relatively, Southampton have had it easy. They are yet to play one of the Champions League elite this season but a 1-0 win away to Liverpool was mightily impressive. Follow that up credibly at Manchester United when the Premier League resumes and they will have to be taken seriously.

So it was hugely refreshing to hear coach Mauricio Pochettino say that reaching the Champions League — not the Europa League, note — is his ambition this season. There is nothing wrong with aiming for the top.

There is a lot of change, vulnerability and inexperience up there this season; more than ever, a big-thinking little club should dare to dream.

article-2449906-18901D2200000578-686_634x431.jpg Euro ambition: Saints boss Pochettino is targeting a place in next season's Champions League

 

 

 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2449906/Roy-Hodgson-England-fail-qualify-World-Cup--Martin-Samuel.html#ixzz2hDNdGrWn

Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

Martin Samuel in the fail

Posted (edited)
Martin Samuel in the fail

 

Of course the national press always denigrate our efforts but the thing is that in today's EPL there are no easy games, which is why Utd lost at home to WBA,Spurs got thrashed by West Ham and Citeh have been beaten by both Villa and Hull. With the sums of money awash in today's EPL all sides can afford good players and the difference between a top top player on an average day and a medium player on a good day has become negligble. If the managers don't get it right then even the reputed top sides will struggle against perceived minnows because if the tactics are right most PL players are well capable of implementing them correctly. Still don't think we'll finish in the top 4 though.

Edited by Window Cleaner
Posted
Goals conceded apart (easily explained by the skewing of fixtures against the top half teams for Adkins' spell compared to Pochettino), those stats are barely different from under Adkins and any variation could be explained by sample size and standard deviation. It's a hell of a leap to show that part of Saints' "long ball" game is to take advantage of un-set defences (true of pressing), when a quick look at the actual "long passes" shows that around half of the "long balls" are entirely within our own half.

 

2013%2f10%2fPochettino-vs-Adkins.jpg

 

Other than the accuracy of the statement that stats in football are underdeveloped and often fail to show cause, the only thing I thought was notable about the article is the phrase "Southampton’s front four press quickly, in clear formation: one going to the ball, two backing him up and a fourth looking fill space and pounce if the ball gets through the initial wave." I hadn't noticed such a clearly defined "method" to the press and will look out for it... in the matches where we bother to press at all.

 

Seeing as they played just over half a season each, they have probably each played all the big teams. Other than Arsenal, I'm pretty sure MP has played them all, but he has played Liverpool twice and won both games. This is a bit of a nonsense point.

Posted
Did I say that? Just don't like the inference that our being in the top flight is/was a foregone conclusion, and Adkins reduced to the role of a 22-game failure.

 

Is this inference in your own mind? it is fair to compare teh stats and by acknowledgement is no inference that NA wasn't a great manager for us and nothing but a success.

Posted
Interesting. I think we break way to slowly & Swansea showed us what we should be doing. The long balls they played were often out wide to Dyer & Routledge. Can you imagine if we still had Oxlade Chamberlain?? In the side for Davis or Jay Rod on the left. Could then rotate with Lallana.

 

What, losing?

 

What we're doing so far this season is fine. We have our way of challenging the opposition, we don't attack teams with the verve and swagger of previous, but that's the price you pay for defensive stability.

 

It does sometimes frustrate me at the speed of our attack, but you cannot really argue about the improved solidity and organisation of the team.

Posted
What, losing?

 

What we're doing so far this season is fine. We have our way of challenging the opposition, we don't attack teams with the verve and swagger of previous, but that's the price you pay for defensive stability.

 

It does sometimes frustrate me at the speed of our attack, but you cannot really argue about the improved solidity and organisation of the team.

 

I agree wholeheartedly with this.

 

It seems to me like we are not happy winning, so we have to moan about the style in which we are winning. Anyone who can't appreciate that our defensive solidarity will win us more points than a full out blitz on the opposition goal would do is a bit mental.

Posted

I like to think we have a more measured approach to attacking ie one where if caught out our team doesn't take forever to get back into there defensive positions and that starts from the front men

Posted
Did I say that? Just don't like the inference that our being in the top flight is/was a foregone conclusion, and Adkins reduced to the role of a 22-game failure.

 

Don't forget we can also ignore the first 12 games of Adkins as that was when were adapting to the premier league so hey dont count. Its only fair to compare his 13 games after that as we'd adapted by then.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...