Shroppie Posted 12 October, 2013 Posted 12 October, 2013 http://sulia.com/m/futbolbible/f/30b1acae-fc30-454d-9ad3-d1876d82d625/ Utd in for £25m As crap goes, this is clearly amongst the crappiest.
Delboy Dave Posted 12 October, 2013 Posted 12 October, 2013 Why? Cuz it's someone in for Shaw? If the report said Saints in for (insert player name here) would it Be crap?
Toadhall Saint Posted 12 October, 2013 Posted 12 October, 2013 http://sulia.com/m/futbolbible/f/30b1acae-fc30-454d-9ad3-d1876d82d625/ Utd in for £25m Not going anywhere not for that derisory amount.
positivepete Posted 12 October, 2013 Posted 12 October, 2013 http://sulia.com/m/futbolbible/f/30b1acae-fc30-454d-9ad3-d1876d82d625/ Utd in for £25m United do not sell to their rivals, so nor should we
Miltonaggro Posted 12 October, 2013 Posted 12 October, 2013 United do not sell to their rivals, so nor should we The press are getting closer with the amount though, just another £15 million on top and a 50% sell on clause and Cortese might return a call...
Shroppie Posted 13 October, 2013 Posted 13 October, 2013 Why? Cuz it's someone in for Shaw? If the report said Saints in for (insert player name here) would it Be crap? It quite often is.
Professor Posted 13 October, 2013 Posted 13 October, 2013 If Spurs or United want a Left Back for £25m we should agree the price and reluctantly let Danny Fox go.
Turkish Posted 13 October, 2013 Posted 13 October, 2013 Why? Cuz it's someone in for Shaw? If the report said Saints in for (insert player name here) would it Be crap? First rule of mongboarding Del boy, any remotely negative article or one linking a player with a move away is lies made up by lazy lying scumbag journos. Whereas any remotely positive article is a great story which is fantastic news and if its linking us to a player then it's amazing to be even linked with players like that.
whelk Posted 13 October, 2013 Posted 13 October, 2013 Turkish's rule is to always reply with same comment to any rumour concerning Saints player. Transfer rumours in papers have been seen to be less than 15%true so statistically likely to be correct when say it is crp. Opportunity to air a superiority complex so why miss that eh. You are all 'mongs' nah nah. You probably would have been a 'spaz'or a 'flid' Pass me my Daily Mail I hate a lot
St_Tel49 Posted 13 October, 2013 Posted 13 October, 2013 It is almost certain that people will bid for Shaw. The only point for discussion is how likely they are to have their bid accepted. I think that it is becoming clear that NC and MP are perfectly serious about a bid for European football so they are unlikely to do anything to undermine that effort.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now