Jump to content

Lambert to be sold in January?

ByTheGolacs

By ByTheGolacs
in The Saints

 Share

Recommended Posts

SNSUN

SNSUN

Posted
Posted

What's he worth, £3-£5 million? Hero though he is, and will always be for Saints, for a 32 year old that's not bad business, and if we want to progress as a club, there's little room for sentiment.

 

That said I'm a big Lambert fan, and I hope he stays and can adapt. Mark Hughes became a midfielder at the tail end of his career - I still think Rickie can do the same, especially as he started out as a midfielder.

max_saints

max_saints

Posted
Posted

I don't see any benefits for the club in selling rickie. The amount that we get for him will not be enough to get another striker who can fill his boots. And its not like our squad is currently overflowing with strikers. Unless we're talking about 8-10 million (which I highly doubt anyone would pay for someone his age) then there really is no point in selling.

ByTheGolacs

ByTheGolacs

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I agree, I guess the deciding factor may be whether or not MP is going to play him though. World Cup year and all that, would Rickie want to be a bit-part, impact sub this year and would we (if MP is thinking along these lines) feel that we owed it to SRL to allow him to go somewhere where he is going to get game time in what is the most important year of his career? To let him go in those circumstance would (in my opinion) be the right thing to do morally.

Colinjb

Colinjb

Posted
Posted (edited)

Building a team around Osvaldo as our long term strategy. Sensible perhaps.

 

Selling the only other viable leading man (and a bloody good one at that) who had signed a long term contract and had pledged to finished his career with us... which would also leave us highly vulnerable should Osvaldo get injured. Totally irresponsible.

Edited by Colinjb
ByTheGolacs

ByTheGolacs

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I agree again with Colin and Adrian, BUT IF it is true, do we owe Rickie the chance to play/start 1st team football given it's his only chance of playing in a World Cup or does the need of the club come before doing the right thing by a club legend? Just wondering?

Colinjb

Colinjb

Posted
Posted (edited)
I agree again with Colin and Adrian, BUT IF it is true, do we owe Rickie the chance to play/start 1st team football given it's his only chance of playing in a World Cup or does the need of the club come before doing the right thing by a club legend? Just wondering?

 

We have no obligation to any player to play them. Their form must justify their selection. Rickie's form is not his best right now and he will have to work to maintain his place in the side and get back to the level we know he is capable of.

 

There is no point playing someone out of form in the hope they get into an international squad. The selectors will see they are not at their best, not pick him anyway (we are not a team right at the top of the league, as we saw it took a LOT for him to get called up in the first place) and our form would suffer.

Edited by Colinjb
Saint Charlie

Saint Charlie

Posted
Posted

IMO the key to his future at Saints is how prepared he would be not to play every game.

 

If he is happy to have his playing time slightly reduced but remain a hero at the club then great.

 

If he wants a guarenteed place every single week then he might not get that at Saints going forward.

 

He isn't suddenly going to be surplus to our needs but there arent many players anywhere that play all the time.

Giordano

Giordano

Posted
Posted

It would make me, my son, my daughter and my girlfriend very sad. We love Rickie. He is a good bloke, family man, great footballer, role model and club icon.

 

We need Rickie more than we need £3-5m plus his wages. He has more than paid his wages plus in the positive publicity that our club has received as a consequence of him being our player in the last few years alone. The value of brand "Southampton" is massively enhanced internationally by him being picked and playing Centre-forward for England. I hope that NC recognizes that and that it will trump "tactical" reasons, especially when he scores versus Palace! As he gets older it will be tougher for him to keep his place that's true but there's a lot of mileage and goals in his legs yet imo.

Keep Rickie Saintly!

saintstr1

saintstr1

Posted
Posted

It will be interesting to see the team selection for this week, Common sense says stick with the same as Anfield but in view of these rumours today I think maybe Lambert is out and Ramirez in. Just my feeling

Turkish

Turkish

Posted
Posted

It's the not the first time we were willing to sell so this wouldn't surprise me. Although I'm sure I'll be told in wrong on that and such a claim is outrageous without any proof.

 

Two things here though, firstly he's recently signed a new contract and any club wanting him will have to pay him a similar amount and secondly as much as we love him what clubs are there who would be willing to pay the salary and transfer fee and give him the contract he'd want for a player in his 30s? It'll be a lower table club if any. As good as Rickie is and as much as I love him I can't think there will be many takers that can offer him first team football and the afford him. Perhaps west ham and maybe Sunderland.

Turkish

Turkish

Posted
Posted
From the club's point of view, who could replace him for £3-5 million? Might as well keep him.

P

It's not about that though is it. It'll be about maximising the return on him, if we sold him now for £4m then I'm sure Cortese would think its excellent business.

 

Cue lots of wailing that if Andy Carroll is worth £15m Rickie is worth £5 billion•.

Whitey Grandad

Whitey Grandad

Posted
Posted
P

It's not about that though is it. It'll be about maximising the return on him, if we sold him now for £4m then I'm sure Cortese would think its excellent business.

 

Cue lots of wailing that if Andy Carroll is worth £15m Rickie is worth £5 billion•.

 

Maybe, but we're only an injury or two away from being short of goalscorers.

dronskisaint

dronskisaint

Posted
Posted
It's the not the first time we were willing to sell so this wouldn't surprise me. Although I'm sure I'll be told in wrong on that and such a claim is outrageous without any proof.

 

Two things here though, firstly he's recently signed a new contract and any club wanting him will have to pay him a similar amount and secondly as much as we love him what clubs are there who would be willing to pay the salary and transfer fee and give him the contract he'd want for a player in his 30s? It'll be a lower table club if any. As good as Rickie is and as much as I love him I can't think there will be many takers that can offer him first team football and the afford him. Perhaps west ham and maybe Sunderland.

 

I agree with your reasoning but the most pertinent bit of of this is that 'such a claim is ...without any proof' and should be seen as such.

Turkish

Turkish

Posted
Posted
I agree with your reasoning but the most pertinent bit of of this is that 'such a claim is ...without any proof' and should be seen as such.

 

We were willing to sell the summer we got promoted. Don't believe it if you don't want to, but it's true.

Saint_John

Saint_John

Posted
Posted

We have had problems with Wayne Veysey in the past. e.g. Back in Jan he wrote this article http://www.goal.com/en-gb/news/3774/the-sweeper/2013/01/26/3700982/the-sweeper-shaw-agreed-new-southampton-deal-because-of?source=breakingnews&ICID=HP_HL_7

The Sweeper has learned that Luke Shaw would not have committed to a new contract earlier this month had he any inclination that Southampton were preparing to dismiss the man
Sources have said that Shaw had only agreed to the deal after being given assurances by senior club officials about the future of Adkins
He is the guy who wrote KP autobiography.
badgerx16

badgerx16

Posted
Posted

Unless we have somebody else lined up to replace him this would be very foolish. Building the attack around Osvaldo is fine, but the other attackers ( J-Rod, Gaston, Lallana, etc ) need to contribute their share of goals, and who would step in if Dani were suspended / injured ?

JN9

JN9

Posted
Posted
We were willing to sell the summer we got promoted. Don't believe it if you don't want to, but it's true.

 

May I ask how you know this?

norwaysaint

norwaysaint

Posted
Posted
Can't see it happening? Who would realistically pay decent money for him? Can't think of anywhere that would be realisitic and appealing for him.

 

Agree with this. He still has a high value to us, so it would take a decent fee to get him, decent wages too. I'm not sure that would be value for the club he moved to, as they can't be sure how long he can perform at this level and he might take a while to settle at another club, it's not certain he'd do for them what he's consistently done for us. He'd be an expensive risk for another club.

 

I don't think he'd like to have to start proving himself all over again at another club at this stage in his career either. I don't imagine he's under any illusion that he'll be first choice in the PL until the day he retires, but I am sure he'll work hard and will have value to us for some time yet, even if that is going to be increasingly from the bench.

Batman

Batman

Posted
Posted

I'm sure we could get good money for him.

Just can't see who would come in and replace him for less than £10m

 

The summer may be a different story

The9

The9

Posted
Posted
http://www.goal.com/en-gb/news/2892/transfer-zone/2013/09/26/4288616/-

 

Who are these people and how the hell would they know something that larger and better connected media outlets don't? Personally (Big If) if it should turn out to be true I'm not sure it would be the end of the world.

 

I've been saying we're going to sell him since we got promoted from the Championship, I'll probably be right eventually, though we do have a bit of a habit of paying people not to play under the current regime...

westofshannonsaint

westofshannonsaint

Posted
Posted

As far as I can remember the last player sold (at least for decent £££) was AOC.

 

We're not a selling club... The only reason Rickie will leave is if he asks to & I doubt we would sell him to a rival, we might rent him out to one though (ala Punch).

Cabrone

Cabrone

Posted
Posted

There's no sentiment in football and Ricky is no different to any other player despite what the fans may think.

 

That said I can't see the point of selling Ricky for what IMO would be a lesser value than he is worth to the club. I think he could do a Sherringham job for the team for a couple of years yet but it's Poch's call in the end.

 

When the day comes I'll be sorry to see him go, he's been absolutely immense for this club.

Suhari

Suhari

Posted
Posted
He'll finish his career here IMO.

 

Or.....

 

He might fancy one last move with a chunky signing on fee. He'll get a far bigger pile of bunce signing to another Prem team then he ever will have in previous transfers. Wouldn't begrudge him that in the slightest.

Matthew Le God

Matthew Le God

Posted
Posted (edited)

The journalist of that article has written a number of nonsensical, negative Saints articles since the Liebherr takeover that haven't come true.

 

Here is another one...

 

http://www.goal.com/en-gb/news/2897/championship/2012/03/29/2999081/mystery-consortium-in-talks-to-buy-southampton-for-25m

 

Wayne Veysey of goal.com is the boy who cried wolf and Pochettino in his pre-match press conference just laughed off the suggestion the club is looking to sell Lambert.

 

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQn-vbvfR5tYhKCGYonA7466tpbIkHY_NCLWu8rC-jN3TFhLeLO

Edited by Matthew Le God
Bewildered

Bewildered

Posted
Posted

MP on Lambert "He's been in the starting XI for five games, so I don't understand these sorts of rumours." #saintsfc

 

Pochettino literally dumbfounded by suggestions Lambert will be sold in January #saintsfc

derry

derry

Posted
Posted

We have 15 league games before the window is open, why would we even be thinking of selling Lambert at this time. Any fee received is small beer compared with his worth. In any case the Bale money gives us a freebie in Lambert's case, we can afford to keep him. Osvaldo could get injured any time and as long as Lambert is fit we would still have good options. The game changer would be if further top class strikers were brought in in January. My view, whatever happens don't let him go this season.

david in sweden

david in sweden

Posted
Posted
Whilst I don't want him to go I really wouldn't be shocked if he was sold.

 

just about sums up my feelings. If Rickie spends two months on the bench and has only scored 2 goals by Christmas...then maybe some people might be inclined to consider the idea ....

 

However, I don't expect either of those eventualities to come to pass and with a couple more England games under his belt....and a goal or two..and a prospective trip to Brazil..the question may never arise.

 

When / If Osvaldo starts his whirlwind goalscoring campaign, he's still going to need another striker to back him up /cover for injury etc, ...and there's very little sign of that at present.

 

If we put 5 past Palace on Saturday, we'll see who gets on the scoresheet...(most likely both the centre-backs again ) :lol:

Stepgar

Stepgar

Posted
Posted

Firstly I love Lambert.

 

But....there i no room for sentiment if you are looking to continue progression.

 

NC has not steered us wrong so far and I am inclined to trust the judgement of NC, MP and the rest of the committee. IF....and its a big if it is time to let Lambert go then he goes. Players will come and go and that is just something that we all have to get to used to. I think age does come in to it and if Lambert is seemed to be struggling for pace etc and therefore attacks breakdown because of it then you have to change things.

 

Harsh as it may sound and as I mentioned at the beginning I love Lambert and what he has been instrumental in what has been an incredible four years would love to see him retire from here. Football is ruthless and sometime hard decisions have to be made.

 

Well after writing all that I see the Simon Peach basically said that he is going nowhere.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...