Jump to content

McGoldrick

ALWAYS_SFC

By ALWAYS_SFC
in The Saints

 Share

Recommended Posts

team-saint

team-saint

Posted
Posted
Why do people look at the OS,just pointless bull****.

 

because its the only site that you can take for fact with real news, like it only says we have bought someone when we actually have.... unlike some sites... :D

um pahars

um pahars

Posted
Posted
Taken from his OS interview

 

 

"Things have gone really well for me so far this season and long may that continue," he said.

 

 

OMG!!!

 

He must set himself some pretty low targets then.

beatlesaint

beatlesaint

Posted
Posted

If he is our main first choice striker or man in the hole, whatever, then we are in big big trouble.

 

He will not score enough goals to keep this club in the Championship I'm afraid.

Toomer

Toomer

Posted
Posted
the truth was the whole team was poor but we got to have a thread about one player.how about the rest of the team.

 

Because he has been sh1te all season.

Verbal Kint

Verbal Kint

Posted
Posted
the truth was the whole team was poor but we got to have a thread about one player.how about the rest of the team.

 

Th rest of the team, although ****e, are not disgusting cheats and at least 'play' with some effort

ALWAYS_SFC

ALWAYS_SFC

Posted
  • Author
Posted
the truth was the whole team was poor but we got to have a thread about one player.how about the rest of the team.

 

He is consistently ****e,yet gets picked every week so therefore

attracts the most attention

beatlesaint

beatlesaint

Posted
Posted

Coming away from St Marys on Saturday there was a group of lads talking about our striker situation and one said "if we had a premiership quality striker we would be fine".

 

To be honest we would be fine with a Championship quality striker, that would do.......unfortunately the ones we have are out on loan and McGoldrick is not yet good enough for this division despite our Director Of Football believing he is.

um pahars

um pahars

Posted
Posted
7 or 8 goals i think who else in the side gets any goals.

 

5 in the league (one of which was a pen and another which was really Lallana's).

 

So 3 in open play then, not good enough:smt102:smt102

Bailey

Bailey

Posted
Posted

I think it's harsh to slate McGoldrick based on tonight's performance.

 

To be fair to him, nobody did well tonight and as a team we were poor.

 

Still, I have to admit I do find DMG very frustrating.

 

However, he does have his moments (Preston away) which makes him hard to drop.

ALWAYS_SFC

ALWAYS_SFC

Posted
  • Author
Posted
I think it's harsh to slate McGoldrick based on tonight's performance.

 

To be fair to him, nobody did well tonight and as a team we were poor.

 

Still, I have to admit I do find DMG very frustrating.

 

However, he does have his moments (Preston away) which makes him hard to drop.

 

We are not slating him on tonights performance alone,we are slating

him because he has been utter S H I T E all season.

ALWAYS_SFC

ALWAYS_SFC

Posted
  • Author
Posted
thats funny i did not see them on the subs bench:D but we could do with a experienced striker along mcgoldrick ,but we cannot afford to keep them.

 

We also can`t afford to continue with this toothless setup either as we

WILL BE RELEGATED IF WE DO NOT SCORE GOALS.

ulstersaint

ulstersaint

Posted
Posted
A lazy, slow pathetic excuse of a footballer with an awful attitude.

 

But worse than that, he's a cheat. I hope he never plays for us again.

 

****

 

Sums him up perfectly.

solentstars

solentstars

Posted
Posted
I think it's harsh to slate McGoldrick based on tonight's performance.

 

To be fair to him, nobody did well tonight and as a team we were poor.

 

Still, I have to admit I do find DMG very frustrating.

 

However, he does have his moments (Preston away) which makes him hard to drop.

they used to slate kenwynne jones and wright philips ,davies has being useless so hes the latest hatchet man.

Leicestersaint

Leicestersaint

Posted
Posted
I think it's harsh to slate McGoldrick based on tonight's performance.

 

To be fair to him, nobody did well tonight and as a team we were poor.

 

Still, I have to admit I do find DMG very frustrating.

 

However, he does have his moments (Preston away) which makes him hard to drop.

 

He looks like a player completely off form and might benefit from a few games in the reserves.

corsacar saint

corsacar saint

Posted
Posted

Mcgoldrick in the four games I have seen is patently not good enough.[ The games were

Ipswich- poor, Coventry - scored but ordinary, Watford- woeful, missed penalty and

numerous other chances. The last game was Plymouth and he missed best Saints chance

of night with dreadful control.

benjii

benjii

Posted
Posted

I still think he has more ability than most of our players and could be a very good player at this level.

 

He would benefit by playing upfront with a strike partner who knows how to be a striker in professional league football.

saint-crinny

saint-crinny

Posted
Posted

I cant really get that annoyed at either DMG or Robertson. its not their fault they get picked even though they are not good enough. There's no-one better, apart from those out on loan - its not like they are keeping better players out of the side. If they were underperforming then that would be frustrating but I dont believe they can do much better. DMG, whatever thinks or pretends to think about him, has not even done it at a lower level than this, and Robertson was loaned out from another side at our level, so he's clearly not that great either.

If you don't have the quality up front, like a Premiership quality striker like Doyle at Reading, then maybe our neat passing outside the penalty area is not the way forward. Then i think you need someone like Howard at Derby when they went up. Go more direct and have your big, strong, ugly man up there with little ability but getting on of long punts up field and play from there. Tonight was a good example, Kuqi is terrible in terms of ability but he won almost every header, barged Pearce out the way for the opener, and generally gave Palace a platform to attack our frail defence.

Unfortunately we have neither options, so i guess we'll just continue to be the best passing side on the way down to league one. How nice

slickmick

slickmick

Posted
Posted
7 or 8 goals i think who else in the side gets any goals.

 

That is the problem, but I wonder if Patterson had been given as long a run in the team that DMG has had, wether he could have done better.

I would also like to see Jamie White come back from loan and send DMg the other way.

solentstars

solentstars

Posted
Posted

i think jamie will come back a better player after his loan spell and could be one of our subs and will be a good playerin time and i rate patterson isanother i would bring in slowley because, i don,t think he can play 90 mns at the moment at this level but i rally rate him.

graymalkin33

graymalkin33

Posted
Posted
He must set himself some pretty low targets then.

 

I think he did. In early pre season he was probably expecting to either be loaned out or play a handfull of games or sub appearances. Little did he realise that he was going to be number 1 choice upfront and possibly 8 goals is far more than he would ever expected. He may even have been happy with 8 appearances if you had asked him pre season.

rpb

rpb

Posted
Posted

So DMG is now getting the same treatment on here that Jones, Fuller, Blackstock and Best received - well it obviously works...

bungle

bungle

Posted
Posted
So DMG is now getting the same treatment on here that Jones, Fuller, Blackstock and Best received - well it obviously works...

 

Let's not forget Davis, Davies, Delap, Telfer, Alan Bennett.....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...