Jump to content

Rupert Lowe - underhand dealings from beyond the realms of football


Saint-Armstrong

Recommended Posts

Can't see why Lowe should pay for the damage caused by the stalker, and if my tenant brought that upon my house, in all honesty I would ask them to leave as well. Repairs and cleaning might well have eaten most of the £1500 up. So what exactly is the problem, save for an obvious dislike for Lowe? There has been no con as far as I can see it, and I note that the violins have come out for a lone parent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do people really hire professional carpet and oven cleaners when moving out of a rented property...?

In answer to the reply above, if this guy has been found guilty of harassment and criminal damage then neither the mother or the landlord should pay for the damage surely?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't see why Lowe should pay for the damage caused by the stalker, and if my tenant brought that upon my house, in all honesty I would ask them to leave as well. Repairs and cleaning might well have eaten most of the £1500 up. So what exactly is the problem, save for an obvious dislike for Lowe? There has been no con as far as I can see it, and I note that the violins have come out for a lone parent.

 

F**k me that's cold! Who asks for a stalker?!!

 

I can understand wanting no part of it but its harsh to say she brought it! The legal fees will be covered by the losing party so if he is sure they can prove they are in the right, then it's worth the outlay. She probably qualifies for legal aid too.

 

It's the kind of thing that you want to believe about Rupert and have no trouble doing so! The court will make its decision but it sounds quite dodgy to be waiting months and be given a vague answer. Any money docked from the deposit either has to be agreed before it is spent and/or properly receipted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty simple to ask to see receipts for cleaning and decorating. Never get a rented place professionally cleaned as the landlord will always get it professionally cleaned themselves. Any decorating that is done for asthetic reasons the tenant is not liable for. If it's to cover up damage or marks above usual wear and tear then you have to pay for it too. Hopefully whoever it is photographed every inch of the place before they moved out as proof.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few things:

 

1. Why should Lowe pay for the damage if there is causation on the girls side?

2. Why would Lowe want a tenant that is going to cost him money?

3. Who paid for the house repairs?

4. Who paid the house deposit?

5. I know someone who got harassed. They received £60k in compensation. I suggest she follow that route of litigation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why?? Because in a decent society which is not all about property rights (oops, it is) a landlord would sit down with the tenant & discuss ways that they could work together to help her & his beloved property.

Following on from these questions you may well ask about her family paying him compensation for her being murdered in his property.

It all about the money!!!! No wonder society is fu ck ed!!!! Absolutely no compassion!!!

 

A few things:

 

1. Why should Lowe pay for the damage if there is causation on the girls side?

2. Why would Lowe want a tenant that is going to cost him money?

3. Who paid for the house repairs?

4. Who paid the house deposit?

5. I know someone who got harassed. They received £60k in compensation. I suggest she follow that route of litigation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why?? Because in a decent society which is not all about property rights (oops, it is) a landlord would sit down with the tenant & discuss ways that they could work together to help her & his beloved property.

Following on from these questions you may well ask about her family paying him compensation for her being murdered in his property.

It all about the money!!!! No wonder society is fu ck ed!!!! Absolutely no compassion!!!

 

Should have let her live there for free, IMHO. Maybe cooked her some meals, or taken the family out to a nice restaurant. Bought her a car, that kind of thing. So heartless.

 

:facepalm:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A member of staff had a personal tragedy , which he paid out of his own pocket to resolve (Make the best out of an awful situation). He might not have been a great chairman, but he is not the ogre some people make out.

 

Damn your balance Gemmel, this thread is for people who hate Lowe to talk a load of crap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, woman gets stalked - who gives a ****.............................as i say loads of compassion.

Trying to help her (if possible) showing understanding & being a decent human being - leads to new car, rent free & buying her dinner........................weird logic that!

 

Should have let her live there for free, IMHO. Maybe cooked her some meals, or taken the family out to a nice restaurant. Bought her a car, that kind of thing. So heartless.

 

:facepalm:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, woman gets stalked - who gives a ****.............................as i say loads of compassion.

Trying to help her (if possible) showing understanding & being a decent human being - leads to new car, rent free & buying her dinner........................weird logic that!

 

More logic than you've got. So what you're saying is that if I have a tenant at my property I should be expected to basically give them anything they want on the premise that what they're saying about the damage to the property is true, and that I should take it upon myself to cover the costs, thereby rendering any reason for renting the property out in the first case utterly redundant ?

 

That would lead to there not being any rental properties due to massive amounts of tenant fraud.

 

That admittedly does solve the problem here, but also creates massive homelessness and poverty amongst people who can't afford to buy houses. Is that what you want ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, woman gets stalked - who gives a ****.............................as i say loads of compassion.

Trying to help her (if possible) showing understanding & being a decent human being - leads to new car, rent free & buying her dinner........................weird logic that!

 

Why should he do that? Have you EVER heard of a landlord doing that? It's not the way the world works, never has and never will. Of course you can empathise with the situation, but I don't believe the story is true, certainly as written above.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can I just say the story the 'pasted' original poster has given is complete ********. This is not how mydeposits or the dps work. If there wasn't agreement on the repayment of the deposit it goes to arbitration if both parties agree for that process. If not it is held with them until a court order tells them otherwise.

 

I just don't understand why 'lovelocum' would bother to make something up that can so easily be proved wrong?

 

Also, just to add Rupert Lowe once ate my hamster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What utter bo ll ocks!! You are making yourself look stupid. What I am saying is that a woman's safety is more important than money or property!

This could all be made - up, I don't know, but I would happily lose £2000 if it meant a woman was safe in her home & not stalked by some freak.

 

 

More logic than you've got. So what you're saying is that if I have a tenant at my property I should be expected to basically give them anything they want on the premise that what they're saying about the damage to the property is true, and that I should take it upon myself to cover the costs, thereby rendering any reason for renting the property out in the first case utterly redundant ?

 

That would lead to there not being any rental properties due to massive amounts of tenant fraud.

 

That admittedly does solve the problem here, but also creates massive homelessness and poverty amongst people who can't afford to buy houses. Is that what you want ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why has he posted the story on the internet? surely it should be dealt with by solicitors. I have seen many of these stories in the past and there is normally the other side that needs listening to as well.

I assume the £1500 is for damage and mess caused by the tenant.(although it does seem quite a lot) Was the rent paid in full?

Whilst I sympathise regarding the stalker, should the landlord have to pay for any damage caused???

I am not a landlord by the way and so that is not why I am showing sympathy on that side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What utter bo ll ocks!! You are making yourself look stupid. What I am saying is that a woman's safety is more important than money or property!

This could all be made - up, I don't know, but I would happily lose £2000 if it meant a woman was safe in her home & not stalked by some freak.

I'm lost... where in the story would £2000 stop the stalker?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few years back a similar thing happened to me (not the stalker part). While searching for a new house I rented a property for a year. Was only a two bedroom flat. Long story short when it was time to leave I paid for a professional cleaning service to come wash the entire house. Clean the carpets, make sure all appliances work etc. This cost me about £300. A lot of money you might think?

 

When it came to handing the keys back the landlord seemed fine, looked at the flat, said everything looked new and said he would return the deposit. Lo and behold a week later I get a letter from him saying the fridge was broken, there was a crack in the shower glass, there was a hole in one of the carpets. Of the £1200 deposit he wanted to keep £1000 to cover the costs. Naturally I was shocked and thought no chance in hell that is happening. A few more weeks went past and I heard from his solicitor. At that point I decided it was time to hand it over to my solicitor too. After we showed them photos of the flat after we left which showed what he said was not true and the cleaning/maintenance service acting as witnesses he caved in. He said "There must of been a mistake somewhere in communication".

 

Most people would of thought "thank god that is over" and just leave it. We didn't. We found out he had done this to the previous tenants too so we jointly took him to court for damages and he lost.

 

Now the point of me telling that story is that by going through that case I learnt a valuable lesson about private renting. A lot of landlords are ****ing crooks who think they are entitled to the deposit money no matter what condition the house is in. Some would go even so far as to create damage to their own property and then try and scare you with legal action so you get scared and pay up. Now I am not saying Lowe has done that, but do I believe he has that side to his character? Someone who would happily take money from someone for pretty much nothing? Without a shadow of a doubt...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few years back a similar thing happened to me (not the stalker part). While searching for a new house I rented a property for a year. Was only a two bedroom flat. Long story short when it was time to leave I paid for a professional cleaning service to come wash the entire house. Clean the carpets, make sure all appliances work etc. This cost me about £300. A lot of money you might think?

 

When it came to handing the keys back the landlord seemed fine, looked at the flat, said everything looked new and said he would return the deposit. Lo and behold a week later I get a letter from him saying the fridge was broken, there was a crack in the shower glass, there was a hole in one of the carpets. Of the £1200 deposit he wanted to keep £1000 to cover the costs. Naturally I was shocked and thought no chance in hell that is happening. A few more weeks went past and I heard from his solicitor. At that point I decided it was time to hand it over to my solicitor too. After we showed them photos of the flat after we left which showed what he said was not true and the cleaning/maintenance service acting as witnesses he caved in. He said "There must of been a mistake somewhere in communication".

 

Most people would of thought "thank god that is over" and just leave it. We didn't. We found out he had done this to the previous tenants too so we jointly took him to court for damages and he lost.

 

Now the point of me telling that story is that by going through that case I learnt a valuable lesson about private renting. A lot of landlords are ****ing crooks who think they are entitled to the deposit money no matter what condition the house is in. Some would go even so far as to create damage to their own property and then try and scare you with legal action so you get scared and pay up. Now I am not saying Lowe has done that, but do I believe he has that side to his character? Someone who would happily take money from someone for pretty much nothing? Without a shadow of a doubt...

 

Have you ever met Lowe to make that kind of judgement? The reason I say this is because I have met him many times, and a good friends Mum was his Secretary from 1997-2003, and had nothing but good things to say about him. Whatever the lazy stereotype of him is, he is not the character you are making him out to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saint armstrong is barking up the wrong tree with this story. Not much sympathy evident and a slanted version of what happened doesn't help. You'd be amazed how may rented properties get trashed and the tenants disappear leaving landlords with thousands to fork out. Ok, we don't really have the story on this one but mr lowe's people are only looking after his interests, i doubt he every knew anything about it probably handled by the letting agency and one of lowe's junior minions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What utter bo ll ocks!! You are making yourself look stupid. What I am saying is that a woman's safety is more important than money or property!

This could all be made - up, I don't know, but I would happily lose £2000 if it meant a woman was safe in her home & not stalked by some freak.

 

Thanks Corky. You can help my friend here. She needs £2000. Trust me it's true. Send your details to the below and she'll get in touch.

 

sayinganddoingaretwodifferentthings@agentskeepdepositslandlordsgetbalance.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you ever met Lowe to make that kind of judgement? The reason I say this is because I have met him many times, and a good friends Mum was his Secretary from 1997-2003, and had nothing but good things to say about him. Whatever the lazy stereotype of him is, he is not the character you are making him out to be.

 

I myself have not met him no. But I knew people who worked at Saints when he was there and they didn't like him much. Remember the bringing in an anonymous letter thing? That is why I think it is within his character. But hey I could be wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Should be on another forum . But I rented my house out down south . It got trashed . No rent paid the management agency screwed up getting them out despite telling me everything would okay . It cost me a fortune in legal fees and repairs . So I know the other side of the fence . By the way I was renting another property where I was working . There are two sides to every story . Even my dell grass was ruined . That's the saints related bit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saint armstrong is barking up the wrong tree with this story. Not much sympathy evident and a slanted version of what happened doesn't help. You'd be amazed how may rented properties get trashed and the tenants disappear leaving landlords with thousands to fork out. Ok, we don't really have the story on this one but mr lowe's people are only looking after his interests, i doubt he every knew anything about it probably handled by the letting agency and one of lowe's junior minions.

 

Not my story, just saw it over on another forum and asked the OP before posting it elsewhere.

 

It's clearly biased and I'd expect nothing else. It just raised a point for discussion and the guy has gone public.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saint armstrong is barking up the wrong tree with this story. Not much sympathy evident and a slanted version of what happened doesn't help. You'd be amazed how may rented properties get trashed and the tenants disappear leaving landlords with thousands to fork out. Ok, we don't really have the story on this one but mr lowe's people are only looking after his interests, i doubt he every knew anything about it probably handled by the letting agency and one of lowe's junior minions.

 

 

maxresdefault.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...