saintadjg Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 SSN just announced Sinclair has gone to WBA We'll take Banega instead
The Saint Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 Would have been a nice signing, but not too disappointed. Can't help thinking it's a strange move for him though...
Saint Charlie Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 Not sure we want a winger really. MP said Osvaldo coming in made it harder for Punch to play so surely the case for any other winger unless they are a huge upgrade.
saintadjg Posted 22 August, 2013 Author Posted 22 August, 2013 Well seeing as we were being linked with him i guess it kind of ends the speculation.
Barry Sanchez Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 **** that, we need someone on the wings who has some pedigree, a bit of a weak spot that along with our full back 2nd's.
Barry Sanchez Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 Not sure we want a winger really. MP said Osvaldo coming in made it harder for Punch to play so surely the case for any other winger unless they are a huge upgrade. Where does he plan to play Osvaldo?
Mr X Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 Not sure we want a winger really. MP said Osvaldo coming in made it harder for Punch to play so surely the case for any other winger unless they are a huge upgrade. Hoe does a striker coming in make it difficult for a winger to get a game?
Lighthouse Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 Hoe does a striker coming in make it difficult for a winger to get a game? Because we like to rotate around the front 4. If Osvaldo is up front, Lambert could be in the hole which means there is one less space for players like Punch, Lallana, Gaston, Davis, JWP, Guly, Isgrove and JRod. Personally I don't think we need any more wingers or strikers at the moment.
Roger Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 Osvaldo will come in from the flanks sometimes like he did at espanol
Restark19 Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 see Andros Townsend's scored 1 and created 1 today for spurs, personally I would take him on loan..
saintadjg Posted 22 August, 2013 Author Posted 22 August, 2013 no loans for me,i only want to see buying players or promoting from within
Barry Sanchez Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 Because we like to rotate around the front 4. If Osvaldo is up front, Lambert could be in the hole which means there is one less space for players like Punch, Lallana, Gaston, Davis, JWP, Guly, Isgrove and JRod. Personally I don't think we need any more wingers or strikers at the moment. Isgrove is young, Guly is ****, Lallana is not a pacy winger, Ramirez is a supposed creative midfielder, Davis is a traditional midfielder, JWP is a midfielder, Rodriguez needs competition and I dont think he should be wide right. ?------Schneiderlin----Wanyama-----Lallana ------------Lambert----------------------- --------------Osvaldo---------------------- Rodriguez will play there but an out an out pacy winger with skill and composure is needed. Oh **** Mayuka..............................
Barry Sanchez Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 Osvaldo will come in from the flanks sometimes like he did at espanol Was that playing 4-3-3?
Smirking_Saint Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 Hoe does a striker coming in make it difficult for a winger to get a game? Simple really, we dont play with Wingers
Barry Sanchez Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 Simple really, we dont play with Wingers Go on, I am intrigued.
studentsaint Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 Typical of saints theis window to miss out on talent to west brom...
doubleonothing Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 Wonder now much was staked on him joining us by the users of this board?
Window Cleaner Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 Wonder now much was staked on him joining us by the users of this board? even if it was 20p it was too much. Not good enough for Citeh=not good enough for us
Smirking_Saint Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 Go on, I am intrigued. Essentially we play with the two holding midfielders and then a forward unit of four who tuck in and attempt to constrict and press when the opposition have the ball, this stops the counter attack but also attempts to win the ball high up the pitch (though without pace its hard to capitalise) J Rod is really the only one that drives forward in wide positions, but essentially the width comes from the full backs. Not saying that the AMs never drift wide, just essentially this isnt part of their play.
pingwing Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 Go on, I am intrigued. Width comes from two attacking full backs with 3 attacking midfielders occupying the hole behind our lone striker. Means there is usually 5/6 people pressing forward from different angles, just not traditional wide players starting out there/sitting out there... Slow response when Smirking_Saint has a more detailed explanation.
Barry Sanchez Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 Essentially we play with the two holding midfielders and then a forward unit of four who tuck in and attempt to constrict and press when the opposition have the ball, this stops the counter attack but also attempts to win the ball high up the pitch (though without pace its hard to capitalise) J Rod is really the only one that drives forward in wide positions, but essentially the width comes from the full backs. Not saying that the AMs never drift wide, just essentially this isnt part of their play. Ok, where do you see most of our goals coming from and how?
Barry Sanchez Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 Width comes from two attacking full backs with 3 attacking midfielders occupying the hole behind our lone striker. Means there is usually 5/6 people pressing forward from different angles, just not traditional wide players starting out there/sitting out there... Slow response when Smirking_Saint has a more detailed explanation. If you are trying to say our full back are wing backs then you are wrong as how much dovetailing goes on? Its just Clyne and Shaws natural game, if we are going to attack and defend in numbers surely that requires a complete passing and control game (Barcelona, Munich), do we honestly have those sorts of players? We need an avenue to create pressure and also ease some.
Batman Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 our club is a joke. cant close a deal like this who is to blame? not happy
pingwing Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 If you are trying to say our full back are wing backs then you are wrong as how much dovetailing goes on? Its just Clyne and Shaws natural game, if we are going to attack and defend in numbers surely that requires a complete passing and control game (Barcelona, Munich), do we honestly have those sorts of players? We need an avenue to create pressure and also ease some. My point is our direct width that tends to come from wingers is being provided by Clyne/Shaw now because buying effective wingers is really expensive/difficult when we have a lot of good attacking midfielders who are better in the middle and sometimes drifting out wide to pull defenders away, which in turn creates and eases pressure in similar ways to classic wingers. The tactics and formations we now employ are to make better use of the players we have instead of trying to bring in/press players into being wingers which is unproductive and quite often the undoing of us.
Barry Sanchez Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 our club is a joke. cant close a deal like this who is to blame? not happy Robin.
Smirking_Saint Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 (edited) Ok, where do you see most of our goals coming from and how? Compination of a couple of set pieces, a few from our attacking midfielders, Lambert and Osvaldo Now that we have a mobile striker, that can play off the ladt man we can arguably capitalise on winning the ball high up the pitch and transitioning quickly into an attacking area, the full backs overlap and provide width out wide which will put balls into the box for Lambert or osvaldo. Attacking wise we set up as so -----------GK----------- ----CB ---DM---CB---- FB-----DM---AM------FB ----AM----ST----AM----- But it obviously looks a lot prettier, and obviously it doesnt always happen that way but essentially thats the transition This is also how we press high up and attempt to stiffle the counter attack, obviously you can see why the system is susceptible to the longball and probably why Wanyama is here Edited 22 August, 2013 by Smirking_Saint
speed demon Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 Wonder now much was staked on him joining us by the users of this board? Glasgow probably had one of his £100 bets @ 18/1.....
Smirking_Saint Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 Ah yes, the lesser known 3-6-1 formation The formation we use is 4-2-3-1 what I am talking is the transitional phase from defence to attack
Barry Sanchez Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 Compination of a couple of set pieces, a few from our attacking midfielders, Lambert and Osvaldo Now that we have a mobile striker, that can play off the ladt man we can arguably capitalise on winning the ball high up the pitch and transitioning quickly into an attacking area, the full backs overlap and provide width out wide which will put balls into the box for Lambert or osvaldo. Attacking wise we set up as so -----------GK----------- ----CB ---DM---CM---- FB-----DM---AM------FB ----AM----ST----AM----- But it obviously looks a lot prettier, and obviously it doesnt always happen that way but essentially thats the transition This is also how we press high up and attempt to stiffle the counter attack, obviously you can see why the system is susceptible to the longball and probably why Wanyama is here I'm not convinced Osvlado is a mobile striker.
grezz Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 The formation we use is 4-2-3-1 what I am talking is the transitional phase from defence to attack Yeah, i knew what you meant exactly (and you are quite correct in my opinion). You just went cwazy with your AMs, CMs and DMs which makes your point harder to follow when looking at the formation
Smirking_Saint Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 Yeah, i knew what you meant exactly (and you are quite correct in my opinion). You just went cwazy with your AMs, CMs and DMs which makes your point harder to follow when looking at the formation Lol that CM was meant to be a CB, sorry bud
Smirking_Saint Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 I'm not convinced Osvlado is a mobile striker. Compared to Lambert ? Al reports I have heard from him is that he leads the line and you will not find a harder working CF, he will chase the ball down all day and will run the channels. I think he is the man we needed, and excited for the season now
SNSUN Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 Not too depressed with missing out here. IF we're after another attacking midfielder, there are better options out there. What a day for WBA fans.
Roger Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 Compared to Lambert ? Al reports I have heard from him is that he leads the line and you will not find a harder working CF, he will chase the ball down all day and will run the channels. I think he is the man we needed, and excited for the season now Carragher has played against him and said he doesn't run the channels and covers the width if posts.
S-Clarke Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 I don't think we ever really wanted him to be honest. As has been alluded to elsewhere, we don't really play with natural wingers. We play a very condensed game through the middle and a lot of our attacks go through the middle. Our width is supplied by the roaming front 3 and the full backs, so natural width isn't really going to be a part of our game. For a new player to come in, they'd need to be a player who could operate all across the front 3 - not just an out and out winger.
Barry Sanchez Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 Compared to Lambert ? Al reports I have heard from him is that he leads the line and you will not find a harder working CF, he will chase the ball down all day and will run the channels. I think he is the man we needed, and excited for the season now You may have heard that but is it true? He is a striker who is physical and will run but he is not a Michael Owen or Hernandez.
shurlock Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 I don't think we ever really wanted him to be honest. As has been alluded to elsewhere, we don't really play with natural wingers. We play a very condensed game through the middle and a lot of our attacks go through the middle. Our width is supplied by the roaming front 3 and the full backs, so natural width isn't really going to be a part of our game. For a new player to come in, they'd need to be a player who could operate all across the front 3 - not just an out and out winger. Didnt Sinclair basically play as a striker for Swansea?
S-Clarke Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 Didnt Sinclair basically play as a striker for Swansea? More coming from the left side, was a winger for them really. but did tally up a decent goal return. Danny graham was their main striker that year.
Smirking_Saint Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 Carragher has played against him and said he doesn't run the channels and covers the width if posts. TBF to carra I expect he only played against him once, Ill go with those that watched him on a regular basis, and more importantly how he played originally for MoPo Bazzer, not saying he is rapid mate, just that he moves faster than the comparative shuffle that we currently have
Turkish Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 I can't believe we've let one winger go and missed out on another one FFS and we still need a terrier in midfield and a small nippy striker to run onto Rickies and Ossies flicks when we get it into the mixer. We need a couple to pacy wingers in before the window shuts or no way will we be able to play an effective 4-4-2.
The9 Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 I'm not convinced Osvaldo is a mobile striker. Can I suggest you do a bit more research then ? Because he is.
Turkish Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 Can I suggest you do a bit more research then ? Because he is. Ahh, that's a relief, he's the man to run onto Rickies flick ons then? From a good old fashioned up and under.
The9 Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 In fact, there's a thread here which helps people who aren't just along for the trolling find out more about where Osvaldo has played previously : http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/showthread.php?46338-Osvaldo-for-Italy-Roma-and-Pochettino-s-Espanyol-Tactics#.UhZ5rNL_mSo
The9 Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 Ahh, that's a relief, he's the man to run onto Rickies flick ons then? From a good old fashioned up and under. Proper engine. Eyebrows at the front stick. Good feet for a big man.
Turkish Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 Proper engine. Eyebrows at the front stick. Good feet for a big man. Be good to have two big lads up front for when we stick it in the mixer if we're chasing a game. If only we had a couple of pacy wingers to get down the line and get the crosses into the back stick.
Smirking_Saint Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 In fact, there's a thread here which helps people who aren't just along for the trolling find out more about where Osvaldo has played previously : http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/showthread.php?46338-Osvaldo-for-Italy-Roma-and-Pochettino-s-Espanyol-Tactics#.UhZ5rNL_mSo Its the Espanyol one Im interested in
Smirking_Saint Posted 22 August, 2013 Posted 22 August, 2013 Be good to have two big lads up front for when we stick it in the mixer if we're chasing a game. If only we had a couple of pacy wingers to get down the line and get the crosses into the back stick. All about the POMO, just get into 'em then get it into the mixer for the big man to stick it in
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now