SuperSAINT Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 Anyone else see David Gold talking about us on the SSN Transfer Centre? - Said us signing Osvaldo puts pressure on teams like them because we are near rivals. - Said he would find it hard to believe we aren't (like them) at the maximum of our wage cap for financial fair play. - Said the only way they'd be able to sign more players would be to sell existing players. I never fully understood how it worked. Is it strictly wages? Or do transfer fee's come into it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itchen_dan Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 He mentioned something about there being a £52m wage cap didnt he? How does that work then? Surely Chelsea and City etc are WAY WAY WAY above that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperSAINT Posted 18 August, 2013 Author Share Posted 18 August, 2013 He mentioned something about there being a £52m wage cap didnt he? How does that work then? Surely Chelsea and City etc are WAY WAY WAY above that? Yes. Must be relative to income? We need MLG. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S-Clarke Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 As far as I know, it's relative to the clubs income. For a PL team, we'll have quite a modest income so will have a lower wage cap than the bigger sides. I think that's how it works anyway. Would also possibly explain why the next signing may just be a loan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angelman Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 One thing I want to know (or be reassured about) is whether we can afford these signings and their wages? I do have faith that NC can run the books properly but I would hate to do a Pompey. I am presuming that TV money is paying for this, and that FFP is there to stop Pompey Mk2, but it would be good to get some reassurance that all is ok. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperSAINT Posted 18 August, 2013 Author Share Posted 18 August, 2013 As far as I know, it's relative to the clubs income. For a PL team, we'll have quite a modest income so will have a lower wage cap than the bigger sides. I think that's how it works anyway. Would also possibly explain why the next signing may just be a loan. Agree. We may also see significant movement with Sharp/Mayuka leaving on loan now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S-Clarke Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 Agree. We may also see significant movement with Sharp/Mayuka leaving on loan now. Don't think we'll let Mayuka go, although Sharp is only a matter of time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1576 Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 Yes. Must be relative to income? We need MLG. Possibly the first time I've seen this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
northam soul Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 At some point we will have to actually start selling players for real money rather than just loaning out. We cannot keep on buying and not bringing some in the other end Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S-Clarke Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 One thing I want to know (or be reassured about) is whether we can afford these signings and their wages? I do have faith that NC can run the books properly but I would hate to do a Pompey. I am presuming that TV money is paying for this, and that FFP is there to stop Pompey Mk2, but it would be good to get some reassurance that all is ok. You can be assured that NC would not spend to put this club into trouble, he has my full trust in looking after the club. If the deal wasn't right for the club, it wouldn't have been done. People on twitter are mentioning ''They're this seasons QPR'' ''the new Portsmouth'' - but it's totally and utterly different. For QPR for eg. they had a real scattergun approach to transfers, they signed anyone with legs - for lots of money - even though they were pretty average. All we've done is spent fair money in international class players to add to the spine (3 players). We've kept the majority of the squad as it was, tied down our best players to long term deals. If worse comes to worse, all of our players have HUGE sell on fee's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 You get 52m over income that you are able to spend on wages, it goes up by around 5 mil a season and can be offset by sponsorship and equity transfers etc etc which is why Utd etc signed 400m deals with their sponsors. Dont qoute me on that but its basically it I think. So yeah, Gold probably has a point but I just dont know, Id hazard a guess Carroll, Nolan, Downing are on a lot a week. This shows the importance of getting the right players in. And I am happy with what we have done this window. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Faz Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 WHU sign senior pros on massive wages. We have a functioning academy and sign younger pros generally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 We can, but the key difference is the value our players will hold. We have a lot of young talent, not many who'll lose value really so money could be raised. I don't think it's that insane, we've seen lots of clubs spend 40m sort of money in a window, just normally on loads and loads of players. It rarely works and probably leads to even bigger wage bills. 3 quality additions and youth players means more likely a sensible wage structure. Not too sure about financial lessons from someone paying 15m for andy carroll either. I agree here Adrian, plus this year was a bumper TV deal year, hence why we arent the only ones splashing the cash. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 Could the financial "jiggery pokery" that happened on the 1st July (as reported on the Companies House website) have anything to do with massaging our "revenue vs wages" ratio? I've no idea how it might work but could we somehow be 'recycling' cash within the Liebherr 'empire' to keep ourselves below the FFP cap? Said Trousers clutching at straws.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weston Saint Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 It is set at £52m wages this season but restrictions only apply to the income from TV money — so any income from sponsorship deals or tickets sale can still be spent on wages. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dan abnormal Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 weren't whu paying nolan upwards of 50k whilst in the championship? bet cole ,downing and carroll are all on very heavy wedges as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulwantsapint Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 Surely if saints ever needed it Cortese could ask Mali to take the naming rights for the ground Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S-Clarke Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 Did anyone sense a tone of ''bitterness'' in Golds comments? Maybe a little bit of panic at us actually overtaking them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeShmoe Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 WHU have just given Stuart Downing 70k a week! They have 6 or 7 bang average players on wages over 50k a week, they can't buy before they sell, they're in a world of debt and he can see we're doing this the right way by using signing bonus' up front to offset weekly wages Basically he's an old fool who has poorly mismanaged that team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 Just easy criticism from people who aren't paying attention. The key is always slowly evolving the team and keeping key players together. QPR were a complete mess with no team from the moment they came up, short term approach and always likely to be a mess. Pompey signed far too many and obviously couldn't afford them, didn't even pay for most, and went for the usual Harry approach of huge wages for older players, with next to nothing in youth players, little in commitment to the club or players who'd been there a fair amount of time. Neither QPR and Portsmouth have an academy to talk of. So neither were able to field any form of youth squad really. The problem was they had no direction or plan, Portsmouth is actually a different case to QPR, they didnt have the money in the first place and pretty much gambled it all building a good team but ultimately couldnt sustain it. QPR have cash, but also had 3 seperate managers of which were given a warchest and told do what you like, thats how they ended up where they are now. Perhaps if they had a commitee and certain style then the players bought would have been transfereable, unfortunately each manager had his own ideas. Harry has done well this season by essentially trying to rebuild and TF has now chucked money at the academy and they may have a chance. That is essentially the difference between Pompey and QPR, Niavety Vs Deceipt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 WHU have just given Stuart Downing 70k a week! They have 6 or 7 bang average players on wages over 50k a week, they can't buy before they sell, they're in a world of debt and he can see we're doing this the right way by using signing bonus' up front to offset weekly wages Basically he's an old fool who has poorly mismanaged that team TBF Downings a good player and looked very good at the weekend but Cole doesnt have long left and is more often than not injured, Carroll is good but again over paid on about 100k a week and suffering from Plantar Fascias, Nolan again good but on hefty wages. They have good players but have overpaid for them. Agree re Gold, was watching and he did seem a bit bitter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 It is set at £52m wages this season but restrictions only apply to the income from TV money — so any income from sponsorship deals or tickets sale can still be spent on wages. Is there anything stopping the Liebherrs sponsoring a blade of St Mary's grass for £50m.... (for example)...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S-Clarke Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 Is there anything stopping the Liebherrs sponsoring a blade of St Mary's grass for £50m.... (for example)...? Probably Wanyama, he owns every blade of grass. I wouldn't try and get it off him either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperSAINT Posted 18 August, 2013 Author Share Posted 18 August, 2013 Did anyone sense a tone of ''bitterness'' in Golds comments? Maybe a little bit of panic at us actually overtaking them? Yes. Aren't they around £100m in debt as well? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulwantsapint Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 Probably Wanyama, he owns every blade of grass. I wouldn't try and get it off him either. Reminds me of the rumour that Radhi Jaidi had been killed but the grim reaper was too 5h1t scared to tell him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S-Clarke Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 Yes. Aren't they around £100m in debt as well? Probably. Anyone who spends £15m on Andy Carroll and matches his wages will be in debt. To think Osvaldo cost less than Carroll. NC is a genius. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevegrant Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 The rule that says you can only increase the wage bill by £4m per year over the next 3 years (i.e. the duration of the current broadcasting contract) only applies to clubs whose wage bill is £52m or above. Ours doesn't even come close to that yet. There are various ways of getting around it anyway, with sponsorship deals etc. For someone who has owned/run football clubs for many years, Gold doesn't seem to actually know much about the financial side of things. A surprise when you look at the utter cluster**** both of the clubs he's owned have been during his tenure... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeShmoe Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 On their forum they're saying Caroll will be out until October and the lad they have now is awful. Given they've bought about 20 strikers in 3 years and not one has been first choice for any period of time says it all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 On their forum they're saying Caroll will be out until October and the lad they have now is awful. Given they've bought about 20 strikers in 3 years and not one has been first choice for any period of time says it all Could be longer, its a nasty little injury he has Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperSAINT Posted 18 August, 2013 Author Share Posted 18 August, 2013 Could be longer, its a nasty little injury he has When did he pick it up? After his move? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 When did he pick it up? After his move? Not sure, just know what it is, and it can take a while to clear up. Despite popular opinion he IS a good player and fits their system, if they stick with Maiga they should be worried. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pastor Patrón Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 £15.5 mill for Andy Carroll......lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turkish Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 WHU have just given Stuart Downing 70k a week! They have 6 or 7 bang average players on wages over 50k a week, they can't buy before they sell, they're in a world of debt and he can see we're doing this the right way by using signing bonus' up front to offset weekly wages Basically he's an old fool who has poorly mismanaged that team Weren't they paying Nolan £50k a week in th championship? Jarvis, Carroll, Downing and Cole will be on a fair old wedge too and they will all except Carroll have little resell value at the end of their contracts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulwantsapint Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 Has andy Carroll got the same heel injury that MLT suffered end of 94/95 season? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 £15.5 mill for Andy Carroll......lol The price wasnt the issue the 100k a week wages is though. Still, certain amount of ignorance for his ability is expected from the average fan. He is a poor player like Downing, Rodwell, cleverley, welbeck, sturridge, shelvey etc etc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 Has andy Carroll got the same heel injury that MLT suffered end of 94/95 season? Plantar fascia or however its spelt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angelman Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 Looked into TV money, and couldn't fin break downs (although didn't look too hard) save that the least to be paid out (ie bottom club) is £65m Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pastor Patrón Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 The price wasnt the issue the 100k a week wages is though. Still, certain amount of ignorance for his ability is expected from the average fan. He is a poor player like Downing, Rodwell, cleverley, welbeck, sturridge, shelvey etc etc I have no idea wtf you're talking about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SOTONS EAST SIDE Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 Cant be as bad as paying £35m for him at LFC, then to not play him. W-T-F Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 I have no idea wtf you're talking about. No comment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DuncanRG Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 The price wasnt the issue the 100k a week wages is though. Still, certain amount of ignorance for his ability is expected from the average fan. He is a poor player like Downing, Rodwell, cleverley, welbeck, sturridge, shelvey etc etc Goodness me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pastor Patrón Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 No comment No care Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 No care Thats good then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The9 Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 We are still nowhere near what West Ham are paying in wages. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glasgow_Saint Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 He is a poor player like Downing, Rodwell, cleverley, welbeck, sturridge, shelvey etc etc Wow! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turkish Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 The price wasnt the issue the 100k a week wages is though. Still, certain amount of ignorance for his ability is expected from the average fan. He is a poor player like Downing, Rodwell, cleverley, welbeck, sturridge, shelvey etc etc Weren't Wellbeck and Sturridges goals and performances dreadful yesterday BTW, awful players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S-Clarke Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 Sturridge is a good player tbf, would have him here in a heartbeat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 Weren't Wellbeck and Sturridges goals and performances dreadful yesterday BTW, awful players. Exactly, all crap, all of them, Welbeck is a sack of crap for England too. 6 goals in 7 games for England and a couple of MOTM performances, dont know why we stick with him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pastor Patrón Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 Exactly, all crap, all of them, Welbeck is a sack of crap for England too. 6 goals in 7 games for England and a couple of MOTM performances, dont know why we stick with him Do you smell like a vagina as well, or just talk like one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 18 August, 2013 Share Posted 18 August, 2013 Do you smell like a vagina as well, or just talk like one? If your assessment of me is as good as your assessment of a player Im pretty sure I dont have much to worry about pal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now