buctootim Posted 11 August, 2013 Share Posted 11 August, 2013 So the gays should help to look after their sibling's children? Not if they're Russian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 11 August, 2013 Share Posted 11 August, 2013 (edited) Not if they're Russian Russia always go against what is natural. I mean the birds do it and everything. Edited 11 August, 2013 by hypochondriac Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colinjb Posted 11 August, 2013 Share Posted 11 August, 2013 (edited) Russia always go against what is natural. I mean the birds do it and everything. Communism for instance. Edited 11 August, 2013 by Colinjb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saintandy666 Posted 11 August, 2013 Share Posted 11 August, 2013 (edited) So the gays should help to look after their sibling's children? That wasn't what I was saying at all. I was talking about birds, not humans, and humans are very different from birds because we have higher intelligence. Obviously, no one should be compelled to do anything. Edit: Just to get it straight, I was addressing the idea that reproduction is the only way of gene propagation as some people seem to have been suggesting. Edited 11 August, 2013 by Saintandy666 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 11 August, 2013 Share Posted 11 August, 2013 That wasn't what I was saying at all. I was talking about birds, not humans, and humans are very different from birds because we have higher intelligence. Obviously, no one should be compelled to do anything. Edit: Just to get it straight, I was addressing the idea that reproduction is the only way of gene propagation as some people seem to have been suggesting. What other way is there in humans? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saintandy666 Posted 12 August, 2013 Share Posted 12 August, 2013 (edited) What other way is there in humans? I don't really see what this has to do with debate. It doesn't matter whether gay people have children or not. If it wasn't 'natural', it wouldn't exist. As for your question, obviously it's going to be very similar to other animals; kin selection etc. When I said people are different because of our intelligence, I was referring to memetics - so culture and so on and how ideas spread and much of that can be perhaps at first glance contrary to reproduction endgoals. I know you are taking the ****, but I'm finding this quite hard to describe in a few lines. Edited 12 August, 2013 by Saintandy666 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saintandy666 Posted 12 August, 2013 Share Posted 12 August, 2013 On the actual topic of the thread, I do not think I support a boycott. I think if all athletes do a symbol when they win, that will be a lot more powerful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 12 August, 2013 Share Posted 12 August, 2013 On the actual topic of the thread, I do not think I support a boycott. I think if all athletes do a symbol when they win, that will be a lot more powerful. What symbol do you have in mind? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 12 August, 2013 Share Posted 12 August, 2013 Maybe instead of the black power fist they can go all limp wristed and mince up to the podium. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DuncanRG Posted 12 August, 2013 Share Posted 12 August, 2013 I hope some of the people in this thread live long enough to see homophobia viewed with the utter and rightful disgust that racism or anti-Semitism are now. It shouldn't be long. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludwig Posted 12 August, 2013 Share Posted 12 August, 2013 Maybe instead of the black power fist they can go all limp wristed and mince up to the podium. You really are a tw*t aren't you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry Sanchez Posted 12 August, 2013 Share Posted 12 August, 2013 I actually agree with him but probably for different reasons, if all athletes camped it up to YMCA upon receiving their medals it would not only laugh completely in the face of stoneage ******s it would show solidarity between all communities. If it has to go to backward places make a complete farce of it, same with the World Cup in Qatar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turkish Posted 12 August, 2013 Share Posted 12 August, 2013 There is plenty of research and it points to it being fundamentally biologically based, just skin colour. So yes, there is plenty of evidence to disprove you. As for the second part of your answer, it's frankly bizarre! not really looking at a few threads you've started. http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/showthread.php?610-Leg-Waxing http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/showthread.php?36425-Gay-Marriage http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/showthread.php?25254-The-Pope Definitely a theme here young Andy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turkish Posted 12 August, 2013 Share Posted 12 August, 2013 On the actual topic of the thread, I do not think I support a boycott. I think if all athletes do a symbol when they win, that will be a lot more powerful. maybe the runner up could bend over the and winner could pretend to bum him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saintandy666 Posted 12 August, 2013 Share Posted 12 August, 2013 I hope some of the people in this thread live long enough to see homophobia viewed with the utter and rightful disgust that racism or anti-Semitism are now. It shouldn't be long. We can only hope. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now