Jump to content

Goal targets


paulwantsapint
 Share

Recommended Posts

As much as I don't really care how or who scores for saints do/should different postions have goal targets?

 

Back 4 as it stands

Clyne, chambers, Fonte, jos, Yoshida, lovern, shaw, fox aim 10 goals

 

Midfield as it stands

Morgan, cork, wanyama, davis, jwp aim 15 goals

 

Attacking mid as it stands

Gaston, lallana, puncheon, isgrove, guly aim 20 goals

 

Strikers as it stands

Lambert, Rodriguez, mayuka aim 30 goals

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much as I don't really care how or who scores for saints do/should different postions have goal targets?

 

Back 4 as it stands

Clyne, chambers, Fonte, jos, Yoshida, lovern, shaw, fox aim 10 goals

 

Midfield as it stands

Morgan, cork, wanyama, davis, jwp aim 15 goals

 

Attacking mid as it stands

Gaston, lallana, puncheon, isgrove, guly aim 20 goals

 

Strikers as it stands

Lambert, Rodriguez, mayuka aim 30 goals

a bit optimistic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All targets need to be ambitious. None of the individual targets in that the OP has written are completely inconceivable (e.g. asking the forwards to aim for 30 goals is ambitious, but could be achieved if we have a superb season).

 

If we were to have targets of, say, 5/10/15/20, we'd only really be aim to repeat last season's form. The OP's 10/15/20/30 is probably 30-50% more than we could hope for, but does give each area of the squad an ambitious and potentially achievable target to aim for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All targets need to be ambitious. None of the individual targets in that the OP has written are completely inconceivable (e.g. asking the forwards to aim for 30 goals is ambitious, but could be achieved if we have a superb season).

 

If we were to have targets of, say, 5/10/15/20, we'd only really be aim to repeat last season's form. The OP's 10/15/20/30 is probably 30-50% more than we could hope for, but does give each area of the squad an ambitious and potentially achievable target to aim for.

 

They set targets similar to those where I work, hence why we don't achieve them often either. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As targets they seem reasonable. Especially in isolation, I expect that all the defenders would fancy their chances of chipping in with a couple of goals, midfielders 3 or 4, attacking midfielders 5-7 and the forwards would be aiming to get 30 between them. The likelihood of everyone hitting their target is remote but as targets they work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As targets they seem reasonable. Especially in isolation, I expect that all the defenders would fancy their chances of chipping in with a couple of goals, midfielders 3 or 4, attacking midfielders 5-7 and the forwards would be aiming to get 30 between them. The likelihood of everyone hitting their target is remote but as targets they work.

 

Point taken but the TARGETS set from OP are 26 goals more than we managed last season, without signing any attacking minded players not sure they are reasonable, maybe another 5-10 extra but 26, not for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As targets they seem reasonable. Especially in isolation, I expect that all the defenders would fancy their chances of chipping in with a couple of goals, midfielders 3 or 4, attacking midfielders 5-7 and the forwards would be aiming to get 30 between them. The likelihood of everyone hitting their target is remote but as targets they work.

 

So you think it's reasonable to set a target that your yourself admit the chase of hitting are remote?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you think it's reasonable to set a target that your yourself admit the chase of hitting are remote?

 

That's not the point though. His point being that, in isolation, these targets are attainable. Although the probability of all being achieved is less likely. If you asked each player their individual goal targets for the coming season, the total number would more than likely exceed 75. For example: Lambert may be aiming for 15-20 goals, Jrod 8-12, Mayuka 6-8, and the same applies to the rest. And as individual targets this may certainly be feasible, and the same can be said when refining targets to positions. But as we know there are many variables in football, including form and injuries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you think it's reasonable to set a target that your yourself admit the chase of hitting are remote?

 

As Super_Saint and I explained, when you break it down the numbers are probably not that far away from the targets that the players themselves would expect at the start at the season. Not every player will realise their own targets, some will but most probably wont. As a group it's very unlikely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As Super_Saint and I explained, when you break it down the numbers are probably not that far away from the targets that the players themselves would expect at the start at the season. Not every player will realise their own targets, some will but most probably wont. As a group it's very unlikely.

 

Oh I get it, so it'll be okay if everyone misses their target by a small amount, that doesn't matter, ie Lambert scores 16 instead of 18, Rodriguez 7 instead of 10, Ramirez and Lallana 5 instead of 7 a few goals each is nothing, except of course for Clyne who scored 2 instead of 1 and Isgove who no one thought would score any but managed to get one. some people will have hit their own target most wont have, but it wont matter because its only by a small amount they missed by and wed have missed the overall collective target by a country mile, but thwt doesnt matter because there was no chance of hitting it anyway. Brilliant stuff.

Edited by Turkish
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh I get it, so it'll be okay if everyone misses their target by a small amount, that doesn't matter, ie Lambert scores 16 instead of 18, Rodriguez 7 instead of 10, Ramirez and Lallana 5 instead of 7 a few goals each is nothing, except of course for Clyne who scored 2 instead of 1 and Isgove who no one thought would score any but managed to get one. some people will have hit their own target most wont have, but it wont matter because its only by a small amount they missed by and wed have missed the overall collective target by a country mile, but thwt doesnt matter because there was no chance of hitting it anyway. Brilliant stuff.

 

:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh I get it, so it'll be okay if everyone misses their target by a small amount, that doesn't matter, ie Lambert scores 16 instead of 18, Rodriguez 7 instead of 10, Ramirez and Lallana 5 instead of 7 a few goals each is nothing, except of course for Clyne who scored 2 instead of 1 and Isgove who no one thought would score any but managed to get one. some people will have hit their own target most wont have, but it wont matter because its only by a small amount they missed by and wed have missed the overall collective target by a country mile, but thwt doesnt matter because there was no chance of hitting it anyway. Brilliant stuff.

 

You're probably right, it doesn't matter what a few guys on a forum think.

 

Just out of interest, what targets, if any, would you set?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're probably right, it doesn't matter what a few guys on a forum think.

 

Just out of interest, what targets, if any, would you set?

 

10 more goals max I would have thought. we are suddenly NOT going to play more forwards instead of defenders, so I doubt lambert AND A N Other will be on the pitch together a great deal.

 

throw in being more tighter at the back, compared to the 1st half of last season

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 more goals max I would have thought. we are suddenly NOT going to play more forwards instead of defenders, so I doubt lambert AND A N Other will be on the pitch together a great deal.

 

throw in being more tighter at the back, compared to the 1st half of last season

 

10 more goals as a collective seems like a reasonable target, but the op was about setting targets for different sections of the team. An additional 10 goals would mean setting a target of 1 goal per outfield player over the course of the season, say 1 for the defenders, 2 for the DM, 3 for the AM and 4 for the forwards - does that seem reasonable?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we are talking at odds slightly, I was talking about setting targets for the team either as individuals, sections or as the team as a whole. You seem to be trying to predict the amount of goals that we will score which is slightly different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much as I don't really care how or who scores for saints do/should different postions have goal targets?

 

Back 4 as it stands

Clyne, chambers, Fonte, jos, Yoshida, lovern, shaw, fox aim 10 goals

 

Midfield as it stands

Morgan, cork, wanyama, davis, jwp aim 15 goals

 

Attacking mid as it stands

Gaston, lallana, puncheon, isgrove, guly aim 20 goals

 

Strikers as it stands

Lambert, Rodriguez, mayuka aim 30 goals

 

Not even my FM team are this good. You're having a laugh mate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think people are missing the point here. The original poster is not necessarily proposing that we hit the overall collective, if that was the case, he would have said so explicitly. He divided the team categorically. And it's certainly feasible when looking at each section of the team individually. It's like I mentioned previously, if you take the individual players goal targets for the coming season, the overall amount would probably exceed 75. What do we say? Hang on a minute Gaston, the overall collective exceeded the probable amount; you're going to have to lower your target from 8 to 3. No, you come to the realisation that there are too many variables in football. And ultimately some players won’t achieve these goals due to poor form or injuries. That's probability. When you look at the broader spectrum it becomes less likely that every target will be achieved. Surely people are not asserting that it's unreasonable if Lambert aimed for 15, Rodrigues 10, and Mayuka 5?

 

In short, take the positional goals into account and ask yourself whether they can be accomplished. Just completely disregard the total. Are they reasonable ambitions? I would say yes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're probably right, it doesn't matter what a few guys on a forum think.

 

Just out of interest, what targets, if any, would you set?

 

Point one, yes it doesn't matter what we say on here.

 

However, i wouldn't set facious targets based on ego.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not feasible that we will score 26 more goals. No teams do that

 

So, no matter how you justify it by saying the defence needs a few more, cork and Morgan need 10 more

 

It won't happen. Unless we play like idiots and ultimately get relegated

Edited by Batman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think people are missing the point here. The original poster is not necessarily proposing that we hit the overall collective, if that was the case, he would have said so explicitly. He divided the team categorically. And it's certainly feasible when looking at each section of the team individually. It's like I mentioned previously, if you take the individual players goal targets for the coming season, the overall amount would probably exceed 75. What do we say? Hang on a minute Gaston, the overall collective exceeded the probable amount; you're going to have to lower your target from 8 to 3. No, you come to the realisation that there are too many variables in football. And ultimately some players won’t achieve these goals due to poor form or injuries. That's probability. When you look at the broader spectrum it becomes less likely that every target will be achieved. Surely people are not asserting that it's unreasonable if Lambert aimed for 15, Rodrigues 10, and Mayuka 5?

 

In short, take the positional goals into account and ask yourself whether they can be accomplished. Just completely disregard the total. Are they reasonable ambitions? I would say yes.

 

Who on here is going to be saying "hang on a minute Gaston" about anything? This is a football forum.

 

Setting a target of 75 goals is retarded however anyone tries to slice it and dice it.

 

Hey, it's merely one goal in every half of football we play. Thats not unreasonable is it Hmmm? Hmmm?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree Super_Saint. The OP doesn't mention the number 75, just targets for each area of the squad.

 

Those targets are very ambitious, but possibly obtainable. The strikers might well have an awful season, and only net 15 goals between them. But if the defenders scored, say, 12 between them, then they would have exceeded expectations.

 

The OP isn't suggesting 75 goals are obtainable, or realistic. The OP is merely giving each area of the squad ambitious targets.

 

Really not sure what the playground bullies have against the concept.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree Super_Saint. The OP doesn't mention the number 75, just targets for each area of the squad.

 

Those targets are very ambitious, but possibly obtainable. The strikers might well have an awful season, and only net 15 goals between them. But if the defenders scored, say, 12 between them, then they would have exceeded expectations.

 

The OP isn't suggesting 75 goals are obtainable, or realistic. The OP is merely giving each area of the squad ambitious targets.

 

Really not sure what the playground bullies have against the concept.

 

Agree with this, I think the concept of individual targets and collective targets are being confused.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...