Saint Garrett Posted 23 July, 2013 Posted 23 July, 2013 @SimonPeach: One caller told me #SaintsFC interested in a versatile right-back, who would seriously challenge Clyne. Expecting story in tomorrow's papers Interesting and welcomed I think. Would be nice to have some backup if Chambers isn't quite there yet.
Bewildered Posted 23 July, 2013 Posted 23 July, 2013 Would also give MP the option to play Clyne at LB if Shaw is unfit/suspended.
Saint Martini Posted 23 July, 2013 Posted 23 July, 2013 Alderweireld? Although describing him as a RB seems wrong, he more of a versatile CB with RB as a very good back-up position.
Saint Garrett Posted 23 July, 2013 Author Posted 23 July, 2013 I think it'll be a proper full back who can play either side.
Lallana's Left Peg Posted 23 July, 2013 Posted 23 July, 2013 Chambers hasn't looked too bad at all to me, be a shame if he lost opportunities because of a new signing in that part of the pitch. That said, I should really reserve judgement once we know who the player is and whether he actually signs.
Colinjb Posted 23 July, 2013 Posted 23 July, 2013 Gino Peruzzi is being mentioned in the HCDAJFU thread.
Saint Garrett Posted 23 July, 2013 Author Posted 23 July, 2013 Is that the fella who was gunna sign for Sunderland?
Crab Lungs Posted 23 July, 2013 Posted 23 July, 2013 Is that the fella who was gunna sign for Sunderland? That's him.
Saint Garrett Posted 23 July, 2013 Author Posted 23 July, 2013 So why did that fall through? Is he ok for a work permit?
Crab Lungs Posted 23 July, 2013 Posted 23 July, 2013 So why did that fall through? Is he ok for a work permit? He's got dual-nationality so WP won't be a problem, no idea about why it fell through though?!?
Colinjb Posted 23 July, 2013 Posted 23 July, 2013 He's got dual-nationality so WP won't be a problem, no idea about why it fell through though?!? Issues with the medical apparently.
Downthe36 Posted 23 July, 2013 Posted 23 July, 2013 He's got dual-nationality so WP won't be a problem, no idea about why it fell through though?!? Thought he had a crocked ankle?
Bewildered Posted 23 July, 2013 Posted 23 July, 2013 The one that Di Canio claims they have decided not to sign over issues with his medical? http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/transfers/transfer-news-gino-peruzzi-switch-to-sunderland-is-off--reveals-paolo-di-canio-8727864.html
Bewildered Posted 23 July, 2013 Posted 23 July, 2013 http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/en/Gino%20Peruzzi/leistungsdaten/spieler_138110_2012.html#ARGC According to this Peruzzi played at RB and RM during last season.
Rebel Posted 23 July, 2013 Posted 23 July, 2013 Kieran Trippier? Jesus Navas? Martin Montoya at Barca can play left and right back! It could well be Peruzzi though.
Colinjb Posted 23 July, 2013 Posted 23 July, 2013 If it is Trippier.... well, I would be livid as a Burnley fan... first Fox, then Jay.....
Olallana Posted 23 July, 2013 Posted 23 July, 2013 Would Trippier seriously challenge Clyne from the off if he comes on though....??
ottery st mary Posted 23 July, 2013 Posted 23 July, 2013 As above medical issues which meant after further trip to Rome specialist...Sunderland withdrew on advice given.. Has Peruzzi not fully recovered from serious ligament injury.... Doubtful at this stage.........surely or is it shirley:rolleyes:
Downthe36 Posted 23 July, 2013 Posted 23 July, 2013 Kieran Trippier? Jesus Navas? Martin Montoya at Barca can play left and right back! It could well be Peruzzi though. Man City will be ****ed.
egg Posted 23 July, 2013 Posted 23 July, 2013 As above medical issues which meant after further trip to Rome specialist...Sunderland withdrew on advice given.: They withdrew as they couldn't wait for him to fully recover. The medical advice was positive: "Sunderland requested permission to subject Gino Peruzzi to a final evaluation at the Villa Stuart Sporting Clinic in Rome, which is directed by the renowned Professor Pier Paolo Mariani. "The evaluation had a positive result with Prof Mariani recommending specific work on the affected muscle area." No real concern IMO.
ottery st mary Posted 23 July, 2013 Posted 23 July, 2013 They withdrew as they couldn't wait for him to fully recover. The medical advice was positive: "Sunderland requested permission to subject Gino Peruzzi to a final evaluation at the Villa Stuart Sporting Clinic in Rome, which is directed by the renowned Professor Pier Paolo Mariani. "The evaluation had a positive result with Prof Mariani recommending specific work on the affected muscle area." No real concern IMO. Cheers.........He does sound a top player.......but loan with a view to see full recovery etc.. Unless as you say no concern re recovery..
Saint Charlie Posted 23 July, 2013 Posted 23 July, 2013 Clyne is class and will be first choice RB all season IMO.
Rebel Posted 23 July, 2013 Posted 23 July, 2013 Man City will be ****ed. They will indeed - I meant Jesus Gamez - it's these bloody Christian names - they is all the bloody same!
SNSUN Posted 23 July, 2013 Posted 23 July, 2013 Clyne is class and will be first choice RB all season IMO. If fit. And not suspended. And if he doesn't fatigue, tire or lose form. Having a replacement doesn't hurt. I'm surprised we don't look at the loan market though. I know loans aren't Cortese's favourite thing, we've not had any since League One except for Jos* (who we then went and signed anyway), but as short term cover, without taking away the opportunities from the up and coming youngsters, it's a 'fix'. Or, signing a talented lower league right back that would be happy just to be in the Premier League, fighting as much as he can to become first choice right back. And as has been mentioned, Trippier fits that role. It keeps Clyne on his toes too! *EDIT: I forgot Falque, but does he really count? :-)
Graffito Posted 23 July, 2013 Posted 23 July, 2013 If fit. And not suspended. And if he doesn't fatigue, tire or lose form. Having a replacement doesn't hurt. I'm surprised we don't look at the loan market though. I know loans aren't Cortese's favourite thing, we've not had any since League One except for Jos* (who we then went and signed anyway), but as short term cover, without taking away the opportunities from the up and coming youngsters, it's a 'fix'. Or, signing a talented lower league right back that would be happy just to be in the Premier League, fighting as much as he can to become first choice right back. And as has been mentioned, Trippier fits that role. It keeps Clyne on his toes too! *EDIT: I forgot Falque, but does he really count? :-) Falque counts maybe to caution against relying on loan players. Full backs are so integral to how we play I think a permanent signing, ideally one that can cover both flanks, is a good call.
SuperMikey Posted 23 July, 2013 Posted 23 July, 2013 Never heard of Peruzzi before, don't follow South American football too closely. Looking over his record he looks like he'd be a good option. Think we need a 'clogger' type fullback though, Clyne and Shaw are good defenders but their lack of height and strength can be shown up at times.
hypochondriac Posted 23 July, 2013 Posted 23 July, 2013 Pleased if we get a rb (maybe a CB that can do a job at rb would be better unless we get another CB too). Just a striker and wide player to go and we are set.
SNSUN Posted 23 July, 2013 Posted 23 July, 2013 Pleased if we get a rb (maybe a CB that can do a job at rb would be better unless we get another CB too). Just a striker and wide player to go and we are set. That's what I'd choose too. A CB that can play at right back comfortably (have we ever had one? Wayne Thomas perhaps), a striker and an attacking midfielder or winger. I'd actually say we could do without the extra CB/RB, but we definitely do need another attacking option, even if it's only the one and it's not a striker. (I do think we'll get more than one in though. Still a long time to go yet.
Chez Posted 24 July, 2013 Posted 24 July, 2013 (edited) the idea of putting a centre back at full back fills me with dread. By and large it doesn't work IMO (Stoke game apart). Maybe for a one off game, but if Clyne gets injured we might need someone that can play 15-20 games. Sam Byram perhaps? Edited 24 July, 2013 by Chez
hypochondriac Posted 24 July, 2013 Posted 24 July, 2013 the idea of putting a centre back at full back fills me with dread. By and large it doesn't work IMO (Stoke game apart). Maybe for a one off game, but if Clyne gets injured we might need someone that can play 15-20 games. Thats why I said someone who could do a job there.
Chez Posted 24 July, 2013 Posted 24 July, 2013 Thats why I said someone who could do a job there. people would and have argued that Yoshida can do a job there. I'd argue he can't.
hypochondriac Posted 24 July, 2013 Posted 24 July, 2013 people would and have argued that Yoshida can do a job there. I'd argue he can't. I don't think he can either.
Turkish Posted 24 July, 2013 Posted 24 July, 2013 people would and have argued that Yoshida can do a job there. I'd argue he can't. I agree. Remember the Fulham game. In the second half they realised Yoshida was uncomfortable at right back and fully exploited that weakness. Virtually every attack came down our right. If we had to use him there for a run of games we'd be in trouble, its one thing to fill in there for 10 minutes at the end of a game quite another to be used three regularly.
Saint Garrett Posted 24 July, 2013 Author Posted 24 July, 2013 Can't see Richards coming here to potentially be second choice....
Olallana Posted 24 July, 2013 Posted 24 July, 2013 I thought Peach expected a story in the papers today, but seems pretty quiet on that one....
Window Cleaner Posted 24 July, 2013 Posted 24 July, 2013 If it is Trippier.... well, I would be livid as a Burnley fan... first Fox, then Jay..... I could pass on Fox tbh
Turkish Posted 24 July, 2013 Posted 24 July, 2013 I thought Peach expected a story in the papers today, but seems pretty quiet on that one.... I thought we all agreed after Peaches article on MLT he was a terrible, sh*t stirring jounrnalist with an agenda against Saints who didn't know what he was doing and made things up from snippets he got on twitter?
mulletsaint Posted 24 July, 2013 Posted 24 July, 2013 Can't see Richards coming here to potentially be second choice.... Maybe as first choice CB who can play RB?
richardc Posted 24 July, 2013 Posted 24 July, 2013 Simon Peach said a caller told him - that could be any random nutjob pretending to be ITK
Turkish Posted 24 July, 2013 Posted 24 July, 2013 Simon Peach said a caller told him - that could be any random nutjob pretending to be ITK It was probably Pilchards.
Saint Garrett Posted 24 July, 2013 Author Posted 24 July, 2013 Maybe as first choice CB who can play RB? Generally can't see him coming here at all tbh, but wouldn't be the worst transfer if we did manage to get him. Be surprised if he'd leave Citeh though.
SuperSAINT Posted 24 July, 2013 Posted 24 July, 2013 I don't get why Peachy didn't just tweet who it was?
Saint-Armstrong Posted 24 July, 2013 Posted 24 July, 2013 I don't get why Peachy didn't just tweet who it was? Because it was obviously someone else's story in the papers, and him breaking ahead of the print to reveal the story would **** his contact off?
Window Cleaner Posted 24 July, 2013 Posted 24 July, 2013 Simon Peach said a caller told him - that could be any random nutjob pretending to be ITK not many of those about now are there :rolleyes:
Made in Southampton Posted 24 July, 2013 Posted 24 July, 2013 So just to clarify Simon Peach is as ITK as Glasgow Saint?
dubai_phil Posted 24 July, 2013 Posted 24 July, 2013 So just to clarify Simon Peach is as ITK as Glasgow Saint? No, no NO. Peachey clearly listed his source. GS never has any sources to list.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now