Jump to content

Oh, Stuart Broad...


dinger
 Share

Recommended Posts

Broad came out and handed them their arses. Broad 7-44, NZ all out for 68. Incredible. As NS says, England were mediocre until then, but a sensational performance from Broad and some top class work in the field has completely stood the test on its head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Broad came out and handed them their arses. Broad 7-44, NZ all out for 68. Incredible. As NS says, England were mediocre until then, but a sensational performance from Broad and some top class work in the field has completely stood the test on its head.

 

Ah, cool. That's not too shabby!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some great displays again today, Cook ticking along nicely. Declare at 250 and it should be job done.

 

Was there. A great day's cricket spoiled only by some moronic Yorkshire spectators and England's failure to put them to the sword in the last hour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do people feel about the follow on issue? It seems to have divided the commentators. Some think if you have a chance to win, you should take it there and then, others pointing towards the value of letting the batsmen have a decent innings in a match they can't lose. I can't help but feel you should always look to destroy the other team if you get the chance. Compton's failed again anyway, he doesn't fill you with confidence for the Ashes. How many did Cook get while Compton ground out his 7 runs? About 60 or 70?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do people feel about the follow on issue? It seems to have divided the commentators. Some think if you have a chance to win, you should take it there and then, others pointing towards the value of letting the batsmen have a decent innings in a match they can't lose. I can't help but feel you should always look to destroy the other team if you get the chance. Compton's failed again anyway, he doesn't fill you with confidence for the Ashes. How many did Cook get while Compton ground out his 7 runs? About 60 or 70?

 

Dissapointed we didn't enforce the follow-on. Of course it pretty much guarantees we can't lose the series, but it did seem a negative approach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do people feel about the follow on issue? It seems to have divided the commentators. Some think if you have a chance to win, you should take it there and then, others pointing towards the value of letting the batsmen have a decent innings in a match they can't lose. I can't help but feel you should always look to destroy the other team if you get the chance. Compton's failed again anyway, he doesn't fill you with confidence for the Ashes. How many did Cook get while Compton ground out his 7 runs? About 60 or 70?

 

Yeah, I suppose as a captain you've got to let someone like Compton have another chance, which I suppose is a reason not to enforce the follow-on. He's blown that chance though, unfortunately. I'd be inclined to start with Root opening against the Aussies, if KP is fit again, drop Compton altogether; he doesn't look ready. Generally speaking I'd take the follow-on and press the advantage and I was disappointed England didn't do that. As J9 says, the declaration was crazily late. NZ haven't a chance of chasing 300, let alone 400, but the weather could prevent a result. Very strange decisions, both of those. I'm not going to be too critical though; England have been excellent in this test, a real bank holiday treat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...