The9 Posted 17 April, 2013 Share Posted 17 April, 2013 One of the things which makes St Mary's different is the large concrete blocking painted red in the middle of the Chapel as well, it's very distinctive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry Sanchez Posted 17 April, 2013 Share Posted 17 April, 2013 Yes Doncaster is a bit crap as well, lovely and practical a bit like a Japanese motor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shurlock Posted 17 April, 2013 Share Posted 17 April, 2013 The article isnt that far off -at least in terms of SMS. It is not the worst stadium in the PL (Reading is in IMO) but its one of the worst. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The9 Posted 17 April, 2013 Share Posted 17 April, 2013 St Mary's would only be better for me if it was nearer my house (but not near enough to affect the traffic) . Love the location, love the clear views in the bowl compared to older grounds, and its uniqueness - it looks a BIT like some other grounds, but you don't hear complaints about the dozens of photofit Archibald Leitch stands that used to be at older grounds, do you ? It's a popular design because it's a good design. Having said that, would be nice if we could customise it a bit more with banners, etc. It doesn't hurt distinctive grounds, nothing wrong with bannering up some that might benefit from more character. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saintandy666 Posted 17 April, 2013 Share Posted 17 April, 2013 The article isnt that far off -at least in terms of SMS. It is not the worst stadium in the PL (Reading is in IMO) but its one of the worst. I think it is a good stadium in terms of it functions well, and obviously has a high quality (for the 4 star rating). However, in terms of 'character', it is very much a flatpack stadium not too dissimilar to a lot of stadiums built around that time. If we could go again, I'd want a bit more individuality, but I suppose that costs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The9 Posted 17 April, 2013 Share Posted 17 April, 2013 The article isnt that far off -at least in terms of SMS. It is not the worst stadium in the PL (Reading is in IMO) but its one of the worst. It has one of the best locations with plenty of transport links, has good views from any seat, nothing miles away from the pitch or obstructed, no really cramped concourses or excessive queues for the loo (could do with better staff and queueing arrangements for food in some areas though), has corporate facilities to support modern revenue generation, away fans are close but not invasive, and whilst we're in the Prem it isn't too small or too big... yet. There are plenty of others that don't offer that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlie Wayman Posted 17 April, 2013 Share Posted 17 April, 2013 Best to ignore idiots in the press rather than fall into the trap of legitimising their waffle by discussing it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saints foreva Posted 17 April, 2013 Share Posted 17 April, 2013 and its uniqueness Nothing Unique about St. Mary's imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bender Posted 17 April, 2013 Share Posted 17 April, 2013 At least MLT has recognition on the same site. http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1605845-20-best-penalty-takers-in-world-football-history/page/21 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shurlock Posted 17 April, 2013 Share Posted 17 April, 2013 I think it is a good stadium in terms of it functions well, and obviously has a high quality (for the 4 star rating). However, in terms of 'character', it is very much a flatpack stadium not too dissimilar to a lot of stadiums built around that time. If we could go again, I'd want a bit more individuality, but I suppose that costs. Agree its functional and does nothing wrong. For a new stadium, its relatively central - probably the most central out of all the flatpacks. And compared to many grounds in the prem, it generates a half decent atmosphere. But given the choice between a Goodison (warts and all) and SMS, I'd go for the former everytime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Charming Man Posted 17 April, 2013 Share Posted 17 April, 2013 Agree its functional and does nothing wrong. For a new stadium, its relatively central - probably the most central out of all the flatpacks. And compared to many grounds in the prem, it generates a half decent atmosphere. But given the choice between a Goodison (warts and all) and SMS, I'd go for the former everytime. Goodison and WHL are by far the best grounds in this league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry Sanchez Posted 17 April, 2013 Share Posted 17 April, 2013 Stoke have a modern ground and generate atmosphere, Goodison is a class old stadium, crap for the middle class clapper but great for the football fan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UpweySaint Posted 17 April, 2013 Share Posted 17 April, 2013 Goodison and WHL are by far the best grounds in this league. Which both teams desperately want to replace? Many have said the reason Everton have not been able to attract investment is Goodison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Garrett Posted 17 April, 2013 Share Posted 17 April, 2013 Stoke have a modern ground and generate atmosphere, Goodison is a class old stadium, crap for the middle class clapper but great for the football fan. I'm assuming you didnt go there this season then? It was silent in the home ends. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sour Mash Posted 17 April, 2013 Share Posted 17 April, 2013 Which both teams desperately want to replace? Many have said the reason Everton have not been able to attract investment is Goodison. Doesn't stop it being a great ground. English football will be a poorer place when such grounds are no more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry Sanchez Posted 17 April, 2013 Share Posted 17 April, 2013 Which both teams desperately want to replace? Many have said the reason Everton have not been able to attract investment is Goodison. True but moot point in it being a real football ground. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry Sanchez Posted 17 April, 2013 Share Posted 17 April, 2013 (edited) I'm assuming you didnt go there this season then? It was silent in the home ends. I was but was in the Gwadlys Street End and the atmosphere was not great but better than at ours. Edited 17 April, 2013 by Barry Sanchez Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The9 Posted 17 April, 2013 Share Posted 17 April, 2013 Stoke have a modern ground and generate atmosphere, Goodison is a class old stadium, crap for the middle class clapper but great for the football fan. Stoke's ground is horrible, as are any grounds with open corners. And I've been there in the Stoke end, supporting Stoke (it was against Brighton when we were both in L1). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shurlock Posted 17 April, 2013 Share Posted 17 April, 2013 Stoke's ground is horrible, as are any grounds with open corners. And I've been there in the Stoke end, supporting Stoke (it was against Brighton when we were both in L1). Was that the day the Rochdale game was called off? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The9 Posted 17 April, 2013 Share Posted 17 April, 2013 (edited) Nothing Unique about St. Mary's imo. Already had this discussion. Derby is not similar, is split all the way around the stands and has one stand much bigger than the others and a sloping roof. Leicester is similar, but it's completely blue... Darlington is quite similar, but isn't a football ground any more anyway and is half the size. Middlesbrough looks like Derby but not St Mary's, and Doncaster looks like Darlington. Edited 17 April, 2013 by The9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry Sanchez Posted 17 April, 2013 Share Posted 17 April, 2013 Stoke's ground is horrible, as are any grounds with open corners. And I've been there in the Stoke end, supporting Stoke (it was against Brighton when we were both in L1). Wind get up your blouse? I agree in the main they are not as good but I love the feel of 4 seperate stands as they have their own identity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UpweySaint Posted 17 April, 2013 Share Posted 17 April, 2013 Doesn't stop it being a great ground. English football will be a poorer place when such grounds are no more. True but we had to move with the times and they will too. Are we nostalgic for the dell? Of Course! But unfortunately economics will always play a fundamental role in football and, despite it's lack of history, the SMS has decent(ish) facilities and is well located(ish!). Perhaps when we crack on with the super stadium rebuild we could add some personality to it so it doesnt look like so many of the others? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The9 Posted 17 April, 2013 Share Posted 17 April, 2013 Was that the day the Rochdale game was called off? Yeah, 19 Feb 2011, I just looked it up. We already were in Warwickshire on the M40 when it was called off, and a quick look at the fixtures nearby(ish) showed we had the choice of going to St Andrews' to see Birmingham v Sheff Wed or pushing on to Stoke to see them play Brighton. I hadn't been to the Britannia so angled for that, whilst the wife and the other passenger wanted to go to St Andrews. I won because I was the driver and it was a new ground for all 3 of us rather than just 2, plus we didn't have any sat nav and I didn't fancy parking in Birmingham. That's also probably the last time I got my own way as well. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The9 Posted 17 April, 2013 Share Posted 17 April, 2013 Wind get up your blouse? I agree in the main they are not as good but I love the feel of 4 seperate stands as they have their own identity. No different from St Mary's then ? Even the Northam-Kingsland Barrier was popular enough to have a poster on Saints Forever named after it... It was quite windy at Stoke too, though we were in the non-open home corner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UpweySaint Posted 17 April, 2013 Share Posted 17 April, 2013 Doesn't stop it being a great ground. English football will be a poorer place when such grounds are no more. True but we had to move with the times and they will too. Are we nostalgic for the dell? Of Course! But unfortunately economics will always play a fundamental role in football and, despite it's lack of history, the SMS has decent(ish) facilities and is well located(ish!). Perhaps when we crack on with the super stadium rebuild we could add some personality to it so it doesnt look like so many of the others? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanW Posted 17 April, 2013 Share Posted 17 April, 2013 Notable Strengths: 1) Great pitch. 2) ??? Anything else? Weaknesses: 1) Standard bowl 2) Two small screens 3) Lack of information 4) Lack of charm 5) Lack of any sort of notable attribute. I'm not complaining about the place - I'm glad we have a relatively new and modern facility. But what about it makes it great? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adrian lord Posted 17 April, 2013 Share Posted 17 April, 2013 I think we could easily install some character at St May's: - put in some period fireplaces, + Chesterfield debenture seating areas - replace industrial spec windows with proper sash wooden ones - free season tickets to several hundred curmudgeonly, cantankerous pensioners - real ale and malt whisky served on concourse bars Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The9 Posted 17 April, 2013 Share Posted 17 April, 2013 Notable Strengths: 1) Great pitch. 2) ??? Anything else? Weaknesses: 1) Standard bowl 2) Two small screens 3) Lack of information 4) Lack of charm 5) Lack of any sort of notable attribute. I'm not complaining about the place - I'm glad we have a relatively new and modern facility. But what about it makes it great? Excellent views, all seats within decent distance of the pitch, decent facilities (PA aside), city centre location, good transport links. Not sure how lack of information is a stadium fault, or how the screens can be described as "small". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ericb Posted 17 April, 2013 Share Posted 17 April, 2013 Goodison and WHL are by far the best grounds in this league. I'd add upton park to that list too, grounds tight to the pitch that create real atmosphere. To be honest i'm one that's still disappointed that we didn't have a steeper ground. For all it's out in the middle of nowhere feel the Madjeski does have a steep bank to it that feels more like a proper ground. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turkish Posted 17 April, 2013 Share Posted 17 April, 2013 I'd add upton park to that list too, grounds tight to the pitch that create real atmosphere. To be honest i'm one that's still disappointed that we didn't have a steeper ground. For all it's out in the middle of nowhere feel the Madjeski does have a steep bank to it that feels more like a proper ground. The best one of the new type stadiums I've been to is Coventry, for that reason, decent steep banks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adrian lord Posted 17 April, 2013 Share Posted 17 April, 2013 The Ricoh also has amazing acoustics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alehouseboys Posted 17 April, 2013 Share Posted 17 April, 2013 I'd add upton park to that list too, grounds tight to the pitch that create real atmosphere. To be honest i'm one that's still disappointed that we didn't have a steeper ground. For all it's out in the middle of nowhere feel the Madjeski does have a steep bank to it that feels more like a proper ground. The best one of the new type stadiums I've been to is Coventry, for that reason, decent steep banks. It is hard to believe the whacky 'MadStad' holds 7,000 less than SMS, looks very similar in size due to the steep rake of the stands but the downside of that is the cramped concourses squeezed underneath. The Ricoh has been designed better and despite the steeper design the concourse is more roomy. The Ricoh also has amazing acoustics. Another thing they got right, I remember when it was opened they said the acoustics was something they'd worked hard at to achieve as previous newbuilds had suffered (think the Barr ones were being referred to) I'm beginning to sound like MLG! That small bunch of Cov in the corner make a fair bit of noise tbf. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sour Mash Posted 17 April, 2013 Share Posted 17 April, 2013 I'd add upton park to that list too, grounds tight to the pitch that create real atmosphere. To be honest i'm one that's still disappointed that we didn't have a steeper ground. For all it's out in the middle of nowhere feel the Madjeski does have a steep bank to it that feels more like a proper ground. Upton Park certainly doesn't have "steep" banks, none of the old traditional grounds do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maggie May Posted 17 April, 2013 Share Posted 17 April, 2013 I'm not sure how this thread has generated so many replies. This is all that matters from the article: "DW Stadium holds a smaller number of about 25,000 spectators and a grass pitch with four separate stands." The DW Stadium has a GRASS pitch everyone! Yes it's a ridiculous article but clearly written by a staffer with no knowledge of English football. I wish Saints fans would stop being so precious, though, especially when caught out by articles as juvenile and naive as this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sour Mash Posted 17 April, 2013 Share Posted 17 April, 2013 True but we had to move with the times and they will too. Are we nostalgic for the dell? Of Course! But unfortunately economics will always play a fundamental role in football and, despite it's lack of history, the SMS has decent(ish) facilities and is well located(ish!). Perhaps when we crack on with the super stadium rebuild we could add some personality to it so it doesnt look like so many of the others? Who knows if Everton really have too move. Plenty of clubs have moved to knew grounds and it really hasn't improved their fortunes on and off the pitch. Also, who knows how many points Goodison Park and all that goes with it have won for Everton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krissyboy31 Posted 17 April, 2013 Share Posted 17 April, 2013 Rarely fills to its maximum ??? wtf Time to think about downsizing IMO! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlakeySFC Posted 17 April, 2013 Share Posted 17 April, 2013 I'm not sure how this thread has generated so many replies. This is all that matters from the article: "DW Stadium holds a smaller number of about 25,000 spectators and a grass pitch with four separate stands." The DW Stadium has a GRASS pitch everyone! Yes it's a ridiculous article but clearly written by a staffer with no knowledge of English football. I wish Saints fans would stop being so precious, though, especially when caught out by articles as juvenile and naive as this. Hear, hear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UpweySaint Posted 18 April, 2013 Share Posted 18 April, 2013 Who knows if Everton really have too move. Plenty of clubs have moved to knew grounds and it really hasn't improved their fortunes on and off the pitch. Also, who knows how many points Goodison Park and all that goes with it have won for Everton. The board feel they have to move. Financially they will be forced to move to survive as a club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sour Mash Posted 18 April, 2013 Share Posted 18 April, 2013 The board feel they have to move. Financially they will be forced to move to survive as a club. No, they won't be 'forced to move to survive as a club'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
red&white56 Posted 18 April, 2013 Share Posted 18 April, 2013 I'm assuming you didnt go there this season then? It was silent in the home ends. Except when they scored Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ericb Posted 18 April, 2013 Share Posted 18 April, 2013 Who knows if Everton really have too move. Plenty of clubs have moved to knew grounds and it really hasn't improved their fortunes on and off the pitch. Also, who knows how many points Goodison Park and all that goes with it have won for Everton. Wasn't saying they do to be fair, more a comment on the fact that the better "new build" grounds are the ones with steeper stands. Of all the new builds though my favourite has to be the Millennium. Cracking ground that, especially when compared to the soulless - and sh.it for acoustics - wembley Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Charming Man Posted 18 April, 2013 Share Posted 18 April, 2013 I'd add upton park to that list too, grounds tight to the pitch that create real atmosphere. To be honest i'm one that's still disappointed that we didn't have a steeper ground. For all it's out in the middle of nowhere feel the Madjeski does have a steep bank to it that feels more like a proper ground. The only problem with Upton Park is the stand to the left of the away end is a bit tinpot, but other than that it's also a top ground. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Without a Halo Posted 18 April, 2013 Share Posted 18 April, 2013 Out of interest but why does anyone like Loftus Road?!? QPR made exactly no noise when we went there, the facilities were on a par with Gillingham (apart from the luxury of a roof) and its in a stupid place... Plus the view was only good for about 5/6's of the fans. Similar problem to craven cottage but at at least had very efficient beer guys at the bottom Most fans like Loftus road because so many of them get 3 points there and then go out on the **** in London! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UpweySaint Posted 18 April, 2013 Share Posted 18 April, 2013 No, they won't be 'forced to move to survive as a club'. Ok poor word choice. To maintain their current position and continue to be competitive without a damned miracle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now