Jump to content

According to beliefs on here


Barry Sanchez
 Share

Recommended Posts

We should have been allowed to fold as we were bankrupt and football does not make any money.

 

 

 

 

The end.

 

 

 

We were allowed to fold Bazza, but luckily ML listened to Nicola Cortese rather than you and decided that you could in fact make money out of football.

 

I don't really understand this thread Bazza, if you're trying to equate a football club with nationalised industries perhaps you could point me in the direction of any football clubs that the state owns?

 

I can see it now in Bazza land, the man from Whitehall deciding on our signings, and you moan about Les Reed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well free enterprise, should we have been allowed to have gone to the wall?

 

We were a good example of free enterprise. We went bust, someone saw an opportunity and bought the assets. Actually it should appeal to your sense of fairness as ML was far more generous to the creditors than he needed to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are not a viable business, we are being subsidised, why couldn't we subsidise an industry?

 

If you can find a Swiss billionaire to take on the railways then fill your boots. You will, however, upset Pap because another British company will have fallen into foreign hands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the poor man of Europe us still that? So you agree that subsidy can and should happen?

 

Not what I said. I was countering the ridulous notion that you could compare a football club funded by a private individual to a state subsidised industry. Why do you think that there are similarities?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, if I understand the beliefs of the posters on this forum, Saints and other clubs are fully justified in being over funded by mega rich backers but Pompey illegally bought their recent FA cup bids and other successes?

 

Just checking

Yes it should be very easy to understand, even for the thickest and most deluded of skates. How does "over-funded" work? Sounds the opposite of the "under-funded" skate model.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

.... Uhm.... fine line between 'underwriting a failing business to keep it afloat - usually characterised by NO progress or improvement and often continuing failure, but kept alive by rich benefactors..... and what ML/NC have done - INVESTMENT, characterised by massive improvements in efficiencty, growth and longer term success as well as an increase in value of the assett. Sanchez fails to diffrentiate between them... and thus fails in his attempt to WUM... LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, i thought that FA cup wins and finals and uefa cup appearances were a significant inprovement on our previous Div 1 status?

 

Of course you have improved, you started from a pretty low stand point didnt you?

I think you're on the wrong thread... you really can't miss the one I think you should be on... it's the small one called 'Pompey Takeover Saga'...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, i thought that FA cup wins and finals and uefa cup appearances were a significant inprovement on our previous Div 1 status?

 

Of course you have improved, you started from a pretty low stand point didnt you?

Never before has there been more need for this :facepalm: What more can be said? :lol: Edited by Sour Mash
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, i thought that FA cup wins and finals and uefa cup appearances were a significant inprovement on our previous Div 1 status?

 

Of course you have improved, you started from a pretty low stand point didnt you?

 

And from under the rock of delusion crawls another of the f*ckers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...