Jump to content

St Mary's not being used for RWC 2015


doubleonothing
 Share

Recommended Posts

The list of grounds for the Rugby Wolrd Cup in 2015 has been announced with the Amex getting the nod over St Mary's.

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/rugbyunion/article-2287325/Rugby-World-Cup-2015-Football-grounds-make-quarters-venues.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

 

Did you read the article? It would appear no-one else responding to this thread has either, as it doesn't say that at all.

 

A very misleading thread title and opening post.

Edited by Matthew Le God
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But a spokesman for the 2015 Rugby World Cup denied the list was valid.

'That list is not at all true. It is entirely speculation,' he said. 'It is not the final list.

 

 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/rugbyunion/article-2287325/Rugby-World-Cup-2015-Football-grounds-make-quarters-venues.html#ixzz2MUGuD64l

Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you read the article? It would appear no-one else responding to this thread has either, as it doesn't say that at all.

 

A very misleading thread title and opening post.

 

Even if it hasn't be chosen, I don't wish for it to be selected.

 

So I would say....

 

Good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if it hasn't be chosen, I don't wish for it to be selected.

 

So I would say....

 

Good.

 

Why not? Can't see a reason why it would be a bad thing. Unless its the pitch issue, but then it would probably be a condition that the pitch gets replaced afterwards in any case.

 

I'm not a massive rugger fan but I reckon I'd have gone to a game or two at St. Mary's if we get it (although it does sound like we won't).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why not? Can't see a reason why it would be a bad thing. Unless its the pitch issue, but then it would probably be a condition that the pitch gets replaced afterwards in any case.

 

I'm not a massive rugger fan but I reckon I'd have gone to a game or two at St. Mary's if we get it (although it does sound like we won't).

 

It is the pitch issue. Even a fresh pitch will still take time to 'bed in' as seen with other stadiums which have replaced pitches. Just keep it for football, much simpler!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is the pitch issue. Even a fresh pitch will still take time to 'bed in' as seen with other stadiums which have replaced pitches. Just keep it for football, much simpler!

 

Most PL pitches get replaced every summer now anyway. And unlike Wembley which had huge problems, most pitches don't take time to bed in. Man United and other clubs have even replaced pitches during the season in seasons past. None of Man United, Newcastle, Sunderland, Villa from the PL deem it a problem, nor do the 7 Football League clubs who bid, so I don't see why we should.

 

Personally I think it would be good for the city.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Totally short sighted of most to argue that it would be a bad thing. How can it be a bad thing to have what is arguably the 3rd biggest world sporting event behind the Olympics and the Football World Cup? The profile it will give the city and our football club will be huge. If selected there would probably only be 3 or 4 games staged anyway so the arguement that the pitch would suffer is a red herring given that Dreading host London Irish every other week as did Watford, with Saracen's, until recently and Wycombe still do with Wasps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you read the article? It would appear no-one else responding to this thread has either, as it doesn't say that at all.

 

A very misleading thread title and opening post.

 

Don't agree. The final choice of venue for south coast bids was between St Mary's and the Amex with a (as i understand it) very closely fought contest between the two. The RFU delved pretty deeply into both bids, but chose the Amex. Fair enough, St Mary's put up a good bid as i understand it. Shame, as it would have been terrific to have hosted some RWC matches. And before you ask, my source comes from Brighton FC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't agree. The final choice of venue for south coast bids was between St Mary's and the Amex with a (as i understand it) very closely fought contest between the two. The RFU delved pretty deeply into both bids, but chose the Amex. Fair enough, St Mary's put up a good bid as i understand it. Shame, as it would have been terrific to have hosted some RWC matches. And before you ask, my source comes from Brighton FC.

 

You may well have a good source, but my point was this thread and the opening post is based on an article that does not say what the opening poster says it does.

 

The list of grounds for the Rugby Wolrd Cup in 2015 has been announced with the Amex getting the nod over St Mary's.

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/rugbyunion/article-2287325/Rugby-World-Cup-2015-Football-grounds-make-quarters-venues.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

 

The article even says...

 

"But a spokesman for the 2015 Rugby World Cup denied the list was valid. 'That list is not at all true. It is entirely speculation,' he said. 'It is not the final list."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...