Jump to content

would you rather have had redknapp than Pinocchio?

Mr X

By Mr X
in The Saints

 Share

Recommended Posts

Mr X

Mr X

Posted
Posted

for me it's a yes I can't stand the bloke as a person but I would take his experience over an unknown quantity if we were going to make a change earlier in the season and he went with redknapp when he was out of work would we have accepted that eventually? or would we protest that as well

Mr X

Mr X

Posted
  • Author
Posted
He has been in the job one day and you have given him a pathetic nickname.

 

Pathetic.

not by choice just easier to spell and remember at the moment and I wasn't the first
jjsaint

jjsaint

Posted
Posted

Surprisingly I would rather have had Arry - much as I hate him at least he knows the English game, he speaks a form of English and he's semi-reliable. I'd rather have pretty much anyone than Pochattino really.

 

I hope I'm proven wrong I really do.

Mr X

Mr X

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Surprisingly I would rather have had Arry - much as I hate him at least he knows the English game, he speaks a form of English and he's semi-reliable. I'd rather have pretty much anyone than Pochattino really.

 

I hope I'm proven wrong I really do.

a bit of honesty yes we mostly all hate him but who would you have had more confidence in keeping us up?
RobM

RobM

Posted
Posted

No. Not in a million years no.

 

Redknapp would get short-term results and bugger off, causing more instability. If everything that has been said about newbie is to be believed (time will tell), he will get results in the long term that match the clubs ambition.

Spudders

Spudders

Posted
Posted
for me it's a yes I can't stand the bloke as a person but I would take his experience over an unknown quantity if we were going to make a change earlier in the season and he went with redknapp when he was out of work would we have accepted that eventually? or would we protest that as well

 

Did you nick this thread idea from Miltonroaders 'thread to-do' list?

Mr X

Mr X

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Did you nick this thread idea from Miltonroaders 'thread to-do' list?

 

no it's a genuine question redknapp was out of work stranger things have happened in football as this appointment prooves

Crouchie's Lawyer

Crouchie's Lawyer

Posted
Posted

No, did Redknapp keep us up last time?

 

He would come here, demand to spend the kind of money he did for the fishy few on washed up has beans who might (although highly unlikely) do it for one season to keep us up but would be on ££££'s per week.

 

The new boss has the right attitude and although I don't like the way Cortese got rid of Adkins or the timing of it, what is done is done and we have to get behind the new guy and support him. The time for bickering, moaning and complaining can be at the end of the season if Cortese's plan has back fired.

 

Redknapp is a mercenary though, just look at his comments about QPR having players they cannot afford for a club with 18k crowds, players on too much and not worth it then he goes and signs a player on rumoured to be £70k a week. He is a dodgy, ball sack faced chump and I wouldn't want him anywhere near our club again.

Spudders

Spudders

Posted
Posted

If the football league was going to finish in a year or two then someone like Redknapp would have maybe been a better choice for the short term, but our chairman is thinking much longer term and as such whilst I'd have given Adkins a bit more time, I can also understand why he's gone for this new guy.

positivepete

positivepete

Posted
Posted
No, did Redknapp keep us up last time?

 

He would come here, demand to spend the kind of money he did for the fishy few on washed up has beans who might (although highly unlikely) do it for one season to keep us up but would be on ££££'s per week.

 

The new boss has the right attitude and although I don't like the way Cortese got rid of Adkins or the timing of it, what is done is done and we have to get behind the new guy and support him. The time for bickering, moaning and complaining can be at the end of the season if Cortese's plan has back fired.

 

Redknapp is a mercenary though, just look at his comments about QPR having players they cannot afford for a club with 18k crowds, players on too much and not worth it then he goes and signs a player on rumoured to be £70k a week. He is a dodgy, ball sack faced chump and I wouldn't want him anywhere near our club again.

 

agreed, a big NO to the original question

VectisSaint

VectisSaint

Posted
Posted
for me it's a yes I can't stand the bloke as a person but I would take his experience over an unknown quantity if we were going to make a change earlier in the season and he went with redknapp when he was out of work would we have accepted that eventually? or would we protest that as well

 

No, no, no. Surely Pinocchio is a more appropriate nickname for Saggy Chops than Mauricio. Saggy is the known liar.

Atlanta Saint

Atlanta Saint

Posted
Posted

If we win 3-0 on Monday everyone will be singing the praises of MP. Still won't deter from the fact that Cortese acted dishonorably against NA. But we have to win on Monday first. Still gutted over the dismissal

Plonko

Plonko

Posted
Posted
He has been in the job one day and you have given him a pathetic nickname.

 

Pathetic.

 

Agreed.

 

It's not even as though he's done anything wrong.

OfnPanad

OfnPanad

Posted
Posted
No, did Redknapp keep us up last time?

 

He would come here, demand to spend the kind of money he did for the fishy few on washed up has beans who might (although highly unlikely) do it for one season to keep us up but would be on ££££'s per week.

 

The new boss has the right attitude and although I don't like the way Cortese got rid of Adkins or the timing of it, what is done is done and we have to get behind the new guy and support him. The time for bickering, moaning and complaining can be at the end of the season if Cortese's plan has back fired.

 

Redknapp is a mercenary though, just look at his comments about QPR having players they cannot afford for a club with 18k crowds, players on too much and not worth it then he goes and signs a player on rumoured to be £70k a week. He is a dodgy, ball sack faced chump and I wouldn't want him anywhere near our club again.

 

 

100% correct, please give the man his prize.

Judge_B

Judge_B

Posted
Posted

Any idea how long we've got to put up with the disrespectful misspellings of his name? How long does it take for faux outrage to die out, exactly?

Mr X

Mr X

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Calling the new manager Pinnochio is very dis-respectful, he is the manager of our club, if you want to have a go aim it at NC and just support the manager and the team 100%

 

COYR 101%

 

yes respect obviously comes high on your agenda judging by your avatar

Minsk

Minsk

Posted
Posted
Calling the new manager Pinnochio is very dis-respectful, he is the manager of our club, if you want to have a go aim it at NC and just support the manager and the team 100%

 

COYR 101%

 

Well, personally, I've tried a few variations but will simply call him Conyo until he earns my respect. I really don't give a toss whether you agree with that sentiment or not either.

Ohio Saint

Ohio Saint

Posted
Posted

So, this thread begs the question:

 

Would you rather be bottom raped by a saggy faced old liar or a handsome young latin dude.

 

I don't even need to be gay to know the answer to this one.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...