Jump to content

Fontes' injury


Glasgow_Saint

Recommended Posts

Why should we hear about a key player's injury? Nah, no reason. That's not the type of information that clubs share with the fans. Ever.

 

Is there a reason? You're right, clubs often do speak openly about this, other clubs don't, doesn't mean we should or have to hear about it. All that matters is Fonte is OK and recovers ASAP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What exactly do the club gain from their media black-out on player injuries anyhow?

 

The same as their blackout on talking about team selection prior to each game. Give the opposition nothing to go on, rather than give them a head start on countering or attacking your tactics and lineup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The same as their blackout on talking about team selection prior to each game. Give the opposition nothing to go on, rather than give them a head start on countering or attacking your tactics and lineup.

 

Seems a pretty tedious policy. If the player is not available through injury then he cant have any impact on the the opposition or the match, full stop. It doesnt make the blindest bit of difference, just annoys and misinforms the supporters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What exactly do the club gain from their media black-out on player injuries anyhow?

 

Quite simple. You don't let the opposition know which players you're going to pick...and keep them guessing. .....alternatively, tell everyone in advance and let them use Plan B:

 

If you were an opposing manager....wouldn't you like to know in advance if....for example.. RL was injured ?.....of course you would ...and you'd pick your team accordingly.

Edited by david in sweden
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does that make it the right thing to do?

 

It can't make it a bad thing to do given the success of, say, Manchester United who are pretty much a role model club for playing football to earn your fortune. It's worked out just fine for them under all of Fergusons reign.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems a pretty tedious policy. If the player is not available through injury then he cant have any impact on the the opposition or the match, full stop. It doesnt make the blindest bit of difference, just annoys and misinforms the supporters.

 

But if the opposition doesn't know he isn't available, they don't know who will be in the starting 11. If they know Fonte isn't available, they know it'll be Jos and know how to attack him. If we keep it quiet, it could be either of them and the opposition won't be able to be specific in their preparation. For all we know he'll be back for Villa... or could be out for the season, Villa don't need to know either way.

 

As a fan is f'ing annoying I agree, I want to know what's-what. But it does make sense from a tactical perspective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems a pretty tedious policy. If the player is not available through injury then he cant have any impact on the the opposition or the match, full stop. It doesnt make the blindest bit of difference, just annoys and misinforms the supporters.

 

Do you really believe this is true?

 

Of course I do. Why would anyone think otherwise?

 

Opposition managers will often base their team selection on that of the expected line up of the opposition, they also do set piece drills in the days leading upto a game. If the opposition don't know if a certain player is playing or not it makes it harder to do.

 

It doesn't matter at all if the fans aren't kept informed. I'd far rather Saints gain whatever edge they can over the opposition by not allowing them to fully prepare to face us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course I do. Why would anyone think otherwise?

 

Opposition managers will often base their team selection on that of the expected line up of the opposition, they also do set piece drills in the days leading upto a game. If the opposition don't know if a certain player is playing or not it makes it harder to do.

 

It doesn't matter at all if the fans aren't kept informed. I'd far rather Saints gain whatever edge they can over the opposition by not allowing them to fully prepare to face us.

 

So you think because they aren't sure if a player of ours is injured or not they would have no idea at all how to defend against us? How to set themselves up to defend set pieces. Is this what you really think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you think because they aren't sure if a player of ours is injured or not they would have no idea at all how to defend against us. Is this what you really think?

 

Would you line your defenders up tactically and physically (team selection) exactly the same for Lambert starting and for Mayuka starting? They offer different strengths and weaknesses and our selection of them gives a huge clue as to our likely tactics and style for that game.

 

Same for players all over the pitch.

 

As we showed against Arsenal and Stoke, we don't just play one way. We vary our approach and style depending on the opposition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you think because they aren't sure if a player of ours is injured or not they would have no idea at all how to defend against us. Is this what you really think?

 

What do you think happens in training in the build up to a game in modern professional football?

 

They have analysed the opposition and prepare to defend and attack against the lineup they expect to play. If they don't know who will play and how they will play it makes preparation very difficult. It makes perfect sense not to give the opposition injury news.

 

If you were Chelsea manager and you knew Mayuka was going to play today would you prepare for the game in the same way as if Lambert was going to play instead?

 

Do you think the Allies should have told the Germans they were invading Normandy and for him not to bother defending other areas? Of course not, they kept them guessing where, how and when they would attack to keep them guessing and give them the best chance of victory. As Tesco's say... every little helps!

 

Remember Adkins has been reading this...

 

books?id=F_txMAEACAAJ&printsec=frontcover&img=1&zoom=1&imgtk=AFLRE70flp4M4BztBAqt1MgAr7YLoQOd-l3wb990oTPE3PptAvvxLxGguE59kAbozQL1tZggTir3_pdIRKWl9CdndoFANSRaKm0pD68T_vwI6qlZEKiH_80tLgIj-EQT26sJkpF15WDs

Edited by Matthew Le God
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do you think happens in training in the build up to a game in modern professional football?

 

They have analysed the opposition and prepare to defend and attack against the lineup they expect to play. If they don't know who will play and how they will play it makes preparation very difficult. It makes perfect sense not to give the opposition injury news.

 

If you were Chelsea manager and you knew Mayuka was going to play today would you prepare for the game in the same way as if Lambert was going to play instead?

 

Do you think the Allies should have told the Germans they were invading Normandy and for him not to bother defending other areas?

 

Remember Adkins has been reading this...

 

books?id=F_txMAEACAAJ&printsec=frontcover&img=1&zoom=1&imgtk=AFLRE70flp4M4BztBAqt1MgAr7YLoQOd-l3wb990oTPE3PptAvvxLxGguE59kAbozQL1tZggTir3_pdIRKWl9CdndoFANSRaKm0pD68T_vwI6qlZEKiH_80tLgIj-EQT26sJkpF15WDs

 

As he often reminds us, though he hasn't spoken much about it this season, perhaps he's finally finished reading it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ahh of Course. You're both right. Its only possible to prepare for one scenario, for one likely line up and for one set of tactics and players. During the game or even when the teams are announced an hour before kick off it is completely impossible to adapt your tactics and strategies to fit any unexpected changes. I'm stunned mangers haven't worked this out yet. Make one unexpected change every week to completely fool the opposition as they won't be tactically aware, prepared or able to adapt their tactics whatsoever. It is a guaranteed way to win every week. It worked so well for us when Mayuka ran riot against Sunderland, based on previous team selection they'd have had no idea he was playing or how to deal with him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you think because they aren't sure if a player of ours is injured or not they would have no idea at all how to defend against us? How to set themselves up to defend set pieces. Is this what you really think?

 

Forget about how we set up on the pitch. Surely it matters in the transfer window? If a selling club knew Fonte was out for a while and we were short at the back, it would be doing its upmost to exploit this vulnerability. This kind of knowledge means a massive shift in bargaining power.

Edited by shurlock
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Forget about how we set up on the pitch. Surely it matters in the transfer window? If a selling club knew Fonte was out for a while and we were short at the abck, it would be doing its upmost to exploit this vulnerability.

 

I don't necessarily have a problem with hiding bits of news if you can. But while it kind of makes sense in theory, in actuality its fairly irrelevant. The football scouting network is so interwoven throughout the game that pretty much all injuries and such like are an open secret. I've seen some of the dossiers that a PL/Championship club put together (a good friend of mine organises them for the club he works for); I've seen a couple they've done about Saints. And you simply wouldn't believe the amount of information in them, often which isn't in the public domain and a lot of the time i find out information that isn't even touched upon on the forums. The amount of research that goes into it is quite amazing, typically by a team of people who have contacts all over the world of football that will find that information.

 

Not blabbing the finer details of injury news is one thing, but trying to keep such a tiight lid on it is pointless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't necessarily have a problem with hiding bits of news if you can. But while it kind of makes sense in theory, in actuality its fairly irrelevant. The football scouting network is so interwoven throughout the game that pretty much all injuries and such like are an open secret. I've seen some of the dossiers that a PL/Championship club put together (a good friend of mine organises them for the club he works for); I've seen a couple they've done about Saints. And you simply wouldn't believe the amount of information in them, most of which isn't in the public domain and a lot of the time i find out information that isn't even touched upon on the forums. The amount of research that goes into it is quite amazing, typically by a team of people who have contacts all over the world of football that will find that information.

 

Not blabbing the finer details of injury news is one thing, but trying to keep such a tiight lid on it is pointless.

 

Quite. I find it hilarious that people like MLG think it's brilliant because it means they won't know how to prepare for us. A mate of mine used to play at Saints in the 90s and even back then they'd have dossiers full of info on every player in the squad. To use the reasoning that they won't known how to defend against us or prepare for us if they don't know who is playing is pathetic. They'll know everything about everyone of our players. Do people seriously think Premier league managers and coaches only prepare for one set of players and tactics in the run up to a game, are completely unable to change them and know absolutely nothing about anyone else other than are likely starting XI?

Edited by Turkish
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...