Jump to content

Drop lambert? Wake up


Roger

Recommended Posts

Was immense today. First half awesome, Merson just said he was only one showing any composure in the ball second half. Where's the9 and window cleaner today?? Scored first goal, made second, made third and also put jay rod through for potential fourth. 8 goals good return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mrs Lambert thinks our Rikeee is world class too.:):).....Sooooo do me and 25,000 other Saints fans:D

 

 

 

Come on Roger down to you and me.....and SRL.........on me ed son:rolleyes:

 

 

 

The Morgan luvvvies will be on here soon telling us that he had another great game.:p

Edited by ottery st mary
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I follow this forum fairly closely (as a form of sadomasochistic punishment) but I can't for the life of me remember many Saints fans calling for SRL to be dropped :?

 

So unless someone can tell me who they are, I'm going to assume they're just the figment of the OP's rather overexcited imagination ...

Go to the Fulham thread and you will see Wessex saint and Window cleaner being 2, that was with just a cursory glance

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you asked and I gave you some examples, you are an Arsenal fan so Idont see your concern anyway.

 

I'm glad to see that you now agree that a only a tiny proportion of Saints fans on here have called for Lambert to be dropped. Never mind, this thread must still have added some sort of value to the forum ... not quite sure what it is though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm glad to see that you now agree that a only a tiny proportion of Saints fans on here have called for Lambert to be dropped. Never mind, this thread must still have added some sort of value to the forum ... not quite sure what it is though.

Well considering you stated that they were a figment of the OP,s imagination and I found 2 without trying too hard , then it is fair to assume there are many more. There are many goons on here and they do not see the value of RL , thankfully they are in the minority, but they are there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well considering you stated that they were a figment of the OP,s imagination and I found 2 without trying too hard , then it is fair to assume there are many more.

 

Well, you've had plenty of time now and the count still only stands at 2 out of 2000.

 

So unless you can at least make it to double figures then the great 'Lambert Out' movement on here doesn't seem to amount to very much does it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, you've had plenty of time now and the count still only stands at 2 out of 2000.

 

So unless you can at least make it to double figures then the great 'Lambert Out' movement on here doesn't seem to amount to very much does it?

The Lambert out movement is a figment of your imagination, a bit like the Cult of Cortese. Doesn't get away from the fact that a number of people were seriously suggesting that Lambert was past it, too slow and should be dropped, especially for the Stoke game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Lambert out movement is a figment of your imagination, a bit like the Cult of Cortese. Doesn't get away from the fact that a number of people were seriously suggesting that Lambert was past it, too slow and should be dropped, especially for the Stoke game.

 

This number of people would appear to be two out of two thousand. But keep on riding that High Horse anyway ....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This number of people would appear to be two out of two thousand. But keep on riding that High Horse anyway ....

Unless you were one who said this, I don't know why you even care. Did you say this? Have you been back and edited your post to try to cover your embarrassment? Lighten up, its Christmas. Perhaps you get embarrassed about people wearing Santa costumes as well, or cringe when Sammy Saint does the Gangnam Style thing. Happy New Year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a lot of it wasnt necessarily dropping Lambert but playing to his strengths, we did today and look what happened ? The past few weeks saw us attempt to play with a very fluid front line, he isnt mobile enough for that IMO but get the ball to his feet or head, chuck it in the box and thats what happens.

 

J Rod will be a decent player though I think

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jay Rod playing with Lambert works so much better, Rodriguez does the running Lambert simply can't.

 

Worked very well today, not sure where this leaves Gaston though, don't think we can play Rickie, Jay and GR in the same side without one of JR or GR playing out left

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a lot of it wasnt necessarily dropping Lambert but playing to his strengths, we did today and look what happened ? The past few weeks saw us attempt to play with a very fluid front line, he isnt mobile enough for that IMO but get the ball to his feet or head, chuck it in the box and thats what happens.

 

J Rod will be a decent player though I think

 

Exactly this. And where was Lambert to score the goal? Lurking at the back post. A typical goal for him and well taken, however it doesn't remove the fact that he isn't mobile enough or skillful enough with the ball at his feet on the run to be ultimately the level of striker we will need to push on. For that reason alone, we will need to upgrade at some stage (not 'drop him' as suggested above).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly this. And where was Lambert to score the goal? Lurking at the back post. A typical goal for him and well taken, however it doesn't remove the fact that he isn't mobile enough or skillful enough with the ball at his feet on the run to be ultimately the level of striker we will need to push on. For that reason alone, we will need to upgrade at some stage (not 'drop him' as suggested above).

 

Not skillful enough? Wind ur neck in mate!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well considering you stated that they were a figment of the OP,s imagination and I found 2 without trying too hard , then it is fair to assume there are many more. There are many gooners on here and they do not see the value of RL , thankfully they are in the minority, but they are there.

 

You were talking about Chapel End Charlie I presume :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless you were one who said this, I don't know why you even care. Did you say this? Have you been back and edited your post to try to cover your embarrassment? Lighten up, its Christmas. Perhaps you get embarrassed about people wearing Santa costumes as well, or cringe when Sammy Saint does the Gangnam Style thing. Happy New Year.

 

And a happy new year to you too.

 

Oh I don't really care that much, but it is a bit silly is it not starting a thread on grounds quite this slight? If I was to start a new thread every time I saw two posts on here I didn't happen agree with ... well let's just say I'd be quite busy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And a happy new year to you too.

 

Oh I don't really care that much, but it is a bit silly is it not starting a thread on grounds quite this slight? If I was to start a new thread every time I saw two posts on here I didn't happen agree with ... well let's just say I'd be quite busy.

Well if you did your research I didn't start the thread, I just went and looked at 1 page on the Fulham game and found 2 instantly.I did not need to find or wish to underline another of your mistakes as you had said the OP was a figment of imagination. An apology would be correct

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well if you did your research I didn't start the thread, I just went and looked at 1 page on the Fulham game and found 2 instantly.I did not need to find or wish to underline another of your mistakes as you had said the OP was a figment of imagination. An apology would be correct

 

Well I have read the above post most carefully, and I'm still mystified as to what it is exactly you feel I need apologise for. Do try and assembled your thoughts into some sort of cogent argument in future.

 

The current state of play seems to be that (almost) 24 hours on and you have still only produced a mere two of the supposed Lambert doubters this thread is aimed at. So I will repeat myself then - that seems to me a pretty slight basis for anybody to form a argument on.

 

For that matter the whole thing would appear to be your archetypal 'storm in a teapot' :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Worked very well today, not sure where this leaves Gaston though, don't think we can play Rickie, Jay and GR in the same side without one of JR or GR playing out left

 

I'd happily sell Ramirez in the January window if it funded the purchase of Brad Friedel and two proper solid centre-backs. Lambert is by an absolute mile the most important player at the club, far more so than Ramirez.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm guilty of wanting him dropped. I wanted more pace and movement up front, and JR given a proper chance. After yesterday I'm persuaded that JR and RL should play together.

 

But, when GR plays in the hole we have the problem of playing RL and having no pace up top.

 

We can overcome that by sticking GR out wide but compromising his talents.

 

If we play GR and RL we have to compromise somewhere. Do we sacrifice pace and movement up top, or GR talents? It's tough but there will be times that RL will have to be sacrificed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I have read the above post most carefully, and I'm still mystified as to what it is exactly you feel I need apologise for. Do try and assembled your thoughts into some sort of cogent argument in future.

 

The current state of play seems to be that (almost) 24 hours on and you have still only produced a mere two of the supposed Lambert doubters this thread is aimed at. So I will repeat myself then - that seems to me a pretty slight basis for anybody to form a argument on.

 

For that matter the whole thing would appear to be your archetypal 'storm in a teapot' :rolleyes:

it takes a big man to apologise/ admit you were wrong, we know what you won't of course.

 

You said the thread was a figment of the posters imagination, i immediately found 2 who were saying just the same thing. The point was made and proved, it was not a figment of imagination by the original poster. Go to the Fulham thread and there are more doubters but I need not trouble myself anymore as I have proved you wrong.

You had also made it seem i had started the thread which I did not, another mistake by you.

As for 'assembled your thoughts in future' I suspect you may have to look in the mirror Charlie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...