JackanorySFC Posted 19 December, 2012 Posted 19 December, 2012 Over the last few weeks I've noticed more in newspaper reports, radio show, MOTD and on Podcasts that people in the game are incredibly enthusiastic about Paul Lambert's Kids and their brave approach to football, how they've turned a corner and are offering "another way" in terms of approaching the Prem. Their average age is apparently 23.4. I was wondering if anyone with more time/ better access to our players profiles could tot up our average as I'm pretty sure we are of a similar average age, certainly play a more expansive game and only a few points behind Villa yet no one mentions us in this bracket, not even for comparison? Is so I'll send an "outraged" email to the Game, Guardian football weekly and the Football Ramble podcasts
Saint Garrett Posted 19 December, 2012 Posted 19 December, 2012 Yer think ours was younger a few weeks ago, however Kelv coming back into the squad will change that.
Tokyo-Saint Posted 19 December, 2012 Posted 19 December, 2012 I think MLG did it before and strangely it was exactly the same, 23.4.
KelvinsRightGlove Posted 19 December, 2012 Posted 19 December, 2012 Clearly depends what team. But Gazza - 20 Clyne - 21 Jose - 28 Yoshi - 24 Shaw - 17 Morgan - 23 Cork - 23 Punch - 26 Gaston - 22 Lallana -24 Rickie - 30 Total of 258 = avg. of 23.45454545
Matthew Le God Posted 19 December, 2012 Posted 19 December, 2012 I think MLG did it before and strangely it was exactly the same, 23.4. When I did it, Ramirez was 21 not 22 and Saints/Villa had the same average of 23.36
Tokyo-Saint Posted 19 December, 2012 Posted 19 December, 2012 When I did it, Ramirez was 21 not 22 and Saints/Villa had the same average of 23.36 Let's just say, we have a similar average squad age.
FloridaMarlin Posted 19 December, 2012 Posted 19 December, 2012 Rickie Lambert out! At 30, he drags the age of that squad upwards. Disgraceful.
JackanorySFC Posted 19 December, 2012 Author Posted 19 December, 2012 Interesting that despite being either the same or very similar in terms of age I'm yet to see us described as a young side? Maybe just missed it? Personally really like the emphasis on young, hungry players with something to prove and not too old to adapt to different systems/ styles of play etc. Hopefully means we can only get better, have to keep hold of gems like Lallana, Clyne, Shaw and Gaston though.
KelvinsRightGlove Posted 19 December, 2012 Posted 19 December, 2012 Interesting that despite being either the same or very similar in terms of age I'm yet to see us described as a young side? Maybe just missed it? Personally really like the emphasis on young, hungry players with something to prove and not too old to adapt to different systems/ styles of play etc. Hopefully means we can only get better, have to keep hold of gems like Lallana, Clyne, Shaw and Gaston though. Would take our recruitment policy over that of QPR/West Ham any day.
jayrivers Posted 19 December, 2012 Posted 19 December, 2012 A few weeks ago we fielded the youngest squad of the season (when Gazza was playing), but Villa beat that at the weekend. I can't image there would have been much in it!
KelvinsRightGlove Posted 19 December, 2012 Posted 19 December, 2012 Just a thought, if Rickie was suspended/injured/dropped and J-rod starts that would bring the avg age down to 22.81.
Window Cleaner Posted 19 December, 2012 Posted 19 December, 2012 Clearly depends what team. But Gazza - 20 Clyne - 21 Jose - 28 Yoshi - 24 Shaw - 17 Morgan - 23 Cork - 23 Punch - 26 Gaston - 22 Lallana -24 Rickie - 30 Total of 258 = avg. of 23.45454545 Swap JRod for Lambert and we'd be down to just above 23 I think, may be even less
fanimal Posted 19 December, 2012 Posted 19 December, 2012 I think the real point here is yet again the anti Saints bias of the BBC. Noticed it on MOTD.
KelvinsRightGlove Posted 19 December, 2012 Posted 19 December, 2012 Swap JRod for Lambert and we'd be down to just above 23 I think, may be even less Great minds, we were clearly thinking the same thing at the same time. (post #11)
KelvinsRightGlove Posted 19 December, 2012 Posted 19 December, 2012 I think the real point here is yet again the anti Saints bias of the BBC. Noticed it on MOTD. Crisp man out!
Jones91 Posted 19 December, 2012 Posted 19 December, 2012 And if Ben Reeves replaces Lallana.... wow omg
StInky Posted 19 December, 2012 Posted 19 December, 2012 [TABLE=width: 84] [TR] [TD]Shaw[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Clyne[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Ramirez[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Schneiderlin[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Cork[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Yoshida[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Lallana[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Puncheon[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Fonte[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Lambert[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Davis [/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] As at today’s date, the team above has an average age of 25yrs 141.4 days. Swap Gazzaniga for Kelvin and it becomes 23yrs 365.7 days. (I'm a sad bastard with time on my hands and a pitiful penchant for spreadsheets).
Tokyo-Saint Posted 19 December, 2012 Posted 19 December, 2012 Just a thought, if Rickie was suspended/injured/dropped and J-rod starts that would bring the avg age down to 22.81. Only if Gazza wins his place back from Kelvin.
trousers Posted 19 December, 2012 Posted 19 December, 2012 Over the last few weeks I've noticed more in newspaper reports, radio show, MOTD and on Podcasts that people in the game are incredibly enthusiastic about Paul Lambert's Kids and their brave approach to football, how they've turned a corner and are offering "another way" in terms of approaching the Prem. Their average age is apparently 23.4. I was wondering if anyone with more time/ better access to our players profiles could tot up our average as I'm pretty sure we are of a similar average age, certainly play a more expansive game and only a few points behind Villa yet no one mentions us in this bracket, not even for comparison? Is so I'll send an "outraged" email to the Game, Guardian football weekly and the Football Ramble podcasts Maybe it's a backhanded compliment to us in that the media are used to a progressive club such as Saints playing a low average aged side whereas for an established Premier League club of the likes of Villa it's a departure from how they usually go about maintaining their Premier League status. The fact that we go under the radar is a sign that we've been doing things right for longer than Villa.
StInky Posted 19 December, 2012 Posted 19 December, 2012 Reeves for Lallana brings it down to 23yrs 248.4 days (told you I was sad).
Glasgow_Saint Posted 19 December, 2012 Posted 19 December, 2012 Replace Guly with any of the 11 and the average age goes from 23.4321 to 25.CRAP! Lol
studentsaint Posted 19 December, 2012 Posted 19 December, 2012 I think it is more obvious with the villa, as there is a sudden emergence of academy players never before noticed. The only player we have in that regard is Shaw. Clyne was known at palace, Ramirez is obviously an international and wasn't undiscovered. Schneiderlin and cork have been playing for a while. Whereas villas Stevens, baker, Westlake is it? Etc are unknown quantities. Plus their entire back four is something like under 21 where it is usually in need of some experience.
david in sweden Posted 19 December, 2012 Posted 19 December, 2012 Rickie Lambert out! At 30, he drags the age of that squad upwards. Disgraceful. .....and 31 ...in February, too
chocco boxo Posted 19 December, 2012 Posted 19 December, 2012 Press seem to love Paul Lambert for some reason, another Stev Bruce waitingto happen IMO.
Lets B Avenue Posted 19 December, 2012 Posted 19 December, 2012 Swap Gazzaniga for Kelvin and it becomes 23yrs 365.7 days. Isn't that 24 years 0.7 days? I dont think it matters that we are currently in a leap year. Yours pedantically.
Appy Posted 19 December, 2012 Posted 19 December, 2012 I think it is more obvious with the villa, as there is a sudden emergence of academy players never before noticed. The only player we have in that regard is Shaw. Clyne was known at palace, Ramirez is obviously an international and wasn't undiscovered. Schneiderlin and cork have been playing for a while. Whereas villas Stevens, baker, Westlake is it? Etc are unknown quantities. Plus their entire back four is something like under 21 where it is usually in need of some experience. The vast majority of their players aren't through the youth system. Westwood,Lowton, Bennett, Holman and Benteke were all signed in the summer.
StInky Posted 19 December, 2012 Posted 19 December, 2012 Isn't that 24 years 0.7 days? I dont think it matters that we are currently in a leap year. Yours pedantically. I didn't say I was any good with spreadsheets!
The9 Posted 19 December, 2012 Posted 19 December, 2012 Rickie Lambert out! At 30, he drags the age of that squad upwards. Disgraceful. That is the gist of my argument, to be fair. I readily admit to being a year or so ahead of the sheep on this one though.
Black Sea Saint Posted 19 December, 2012 Posted 19 December, 2012 I think the real point here is yet again the anti Saints bias of the BBC. Noticed it on MOTD. I'm not sure it's anti-Saints, it just appears that Villa have a better PR person, as highlighted on this week's Guardian Football Weekly podcast when one of the panel was talking about smoozing with the Villa press officer at the weekend. That stuff pays dividends when it comes to the press reporting positivity about a team.
sammysaint Posted 20 December, 2012 Posted 20 December, 2012 I would rather us slowly build a squad with less media coverage, lets be honest media hype can make things worse and make players look better/worse then what they are. If we win saturday i bet all the press and MOTD will focus on how well were doing and were still be top 5 in the form table.
labibs Posted 20 December, 2012 Posted 20 December, 2012 Probably worth mentioning that at the very least Vlaar and possibly Dunne would be in that team were it not for injuries. Petrov would likely play as well were he not still receiving treatment for his illness. That's not really their strongest team, but a side brought out through circumstances.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now