Jump to content

what's the real difference.....


david in sweden
 Share

Recommended Posts

So we have those on the forum who think that the team that lost 6-1 to Arsenal and 4-1 to West Ham, and lest we forget 2-0 to Wigan at home would have faired better than the one with Cork and Shaw in it.

 

....care in the community is all well and good but there is a lot to be said for a old Victorian solid brick built asylum where you can't hear the screams.:scared:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So we have those on the forum who think that the team that lost 6-1 to Arsenal and 4-1 to West Ham, and lest we forget 2-0 to Wigan at home would have fared better than the one with Cork and Shaw in it.

 

....care in the community is all well and good but there is a lot to be said for a old Victorian solid brick built asylum where you can't hear the screams.:scared:

 

Do we ? I haven't actually seen anyone say that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

by and large I think I agree with you, but can you explain the difference between the `traditional sense of a 4-4-2' and what we do?

 

I mean a formation where there are two banks of four (defence and midfield) who are set up in straight lines across the pitch and two strikers playing off each other. We set up like this sometimes last season as did many of the teams we played against as did Newcastle when we played them a few weeks back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...