trousers Posted 30 November, 2012 Posted 30 November, 2012 (edited) @RobHarris: Table of Premier League clubs' payments to agents http://t.co/7wjnW2w7 Edited 30 November, 2012 by trousers
trousers Posted 30 November, 2012 Author Posted 30 November, 2012 (edited) @RobHarris: Table of Premier League clubs' payments to agents http://t.co/7wjnW2w7 Edited 30 November, 2012 by trousers
Golden Balls Posted 30 November, 2012 Posted 30 November, 2012 Maybe that's why we're so "hard to deal with".
Golden Balls Posted 30 November, 2012 Posted 30 November, 2012 Maybe that's why we're so "hard to deal with".
LGTL Posted 30 November, 2012 Posted 30 November, 2012 Pretty much at least half less then all the others.
LGTL Posted 30 November, 2012 Posted 30 November, 2012 Pretty much at least half less then all the others.
Graffito Posted 30 November, 2012 Posted 30 November, 2012 For what period? Who or what is the source of this info (don't mean @robharris)?
Graffito Posted 30 November, 2012 Posted 30 November, 2012 For what period? Who or what is the source of this info (don't mean @robharris)?
Turkish Posted 30 November, 2012 Posted 30 November, 2012 For what period? Who or what is the source of this info (don't mean @robharris)? Exactly. WIthout more information this cannot be declared as good or bad news.
Turkish Posted 30 November, 2012 Posted 30 November, 2012 For what period? Who or what is the source of this info (don't mean @robharris)? Exactly. WIthout more information this cannot be declared as good or bad news.
Glasgow_Saint Posted 30 November, 2012 Posted 30 November, 2012 http://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/scotsol/homepage/sport/football/4674952/Agents-fees-shock.html
Glasgow_Saint Posted 30 November, 2012 Posted 30 November, 2012 http://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/scotsol/homepage/sport/football/4674952/Agents-fees-shock.html
trousers Posted 30 November, 2012 Author Posted 30 November, 2012 For what period? Who or what is the source of this info (don't mean @robharris)? Oct 2011 - Sept 2012
trousers Posted 30 November, 2012 Author Posted 30 November, 2012 For what period? Who or what is the source of this info (don't mean @robharris)? Oct 2011 - Sept 2012
Saint Garrett Posted 30 November, 2012 Posted 30 November, 2012 Says we barely spent anything as we spent that time in the NPC.... Look at West Ham!! 7th most in the current prem!
Saint Garrett Posted 30 November, 2012 Posted 30 November, 2012 Says we barely spent anything as we spent that time in the NPC.... Look at West Ham!! 7th most in the current prem!
corsacar saint Posted 30 November, 2012 Posted 30 November, 2012 Totaally with NC on this one,all football agents are parasites allegedly.
corsacar saint Posted 30 November, 2012 Posted 30 November, 2012 Totaally with NC on this one,all football agents are parasites allegedly.
buctootim Posted 30 November, 2012 Posted 30 November, 2012 West Ham haven't messed around. West Ham are £100m in debt.
buctootim Posted 30 November, 2012 Posted 30 November, 2012 West Ham haven't messed around. West Ham are £100m in debt.
Turkish Posted 30 November, 2012 Posted 30 November, 2012 Totaally with NC on this one,all football agents are parasites allegedly. That they are but unfortunately they are there and dealt with and players listen to them.
Turkish Posted 30 November, 2012 Posted 30 November, 2012 Totaally with NC on this one,all football agents are parasites allegedly. That they are but unfortunately they are there and dealt with and players listen to them.
Colinjb Posted 30 November, 2012 Posted 30 November, 2012 So that includes the last window. Interesting.
Colinjb Posted 30 November, 2012 Posted 30 November, 2012 So that includes the last window. Interesting.
The Kraken Posted 30 November, 2012 Posted 30 November, 2012 So, 7th highest spending in Europe but the lowest in the Premier League for agents' fees. Either NC is a fugging genius or there's another answer. Until I see evidence that this is true i don't think anyone should develop an opinion either way.
The Kraken Posted 30 November, 2012 Posted 30 November, 2012 So, 7th highest spending in Europe but the lowest in the Premier League for agents' fees. Either NC is a fugging genius or there's another answer. Until I see evidence that this is true i don't think anyone should develop an opinion either way.
aintforever Posted 30 November, 2012 Posted 30 November, 2012 It's great that we are not paying much to agents. Not so great if we get relegated because we couldn't land the defenders/keeper we needed because agents don't like dealing with us (if that is the case).
aintforever Posted 30 November, 2012 Posted 30 November, 2012 It's great that we are not paying much to agents. Not so great if we get relegated because we couldn't land the defenders/keeper we needed because agents don't like dealing with us (if that is the case).
JackanorySFC Posted 30 November, 2012 Posted 30 November, 2012 I have to say this is very interesting and if accurate, which we have to assume it is as Agent's fees are now transparent, it shows a refreshing approach to transfer deals. To sign the players we did paying that little in fees is nothing short of spectacular stuff from the finance, legal and exec decision makers at SFC, Also explains the reason the Buttner deal fell through and possibly a centre half. As a misty eyed romantic that yearns for the days before agents took huge sums from our game I'd even say it was worth a deal or two falling through for the sake of cementing our stance on this. Also, I do believe last season we again were one of the lowest payers in the Championship?
JackanorySFC Posted 30 November, 2012 Posted 30 November, 2012 I have to say this is very interesting and if accurate, which we have to assume it is as Agent's fees are now transparent, it shows a refreshing approach to transfer deals. To sign the players we did paying that little in fees is nothing short of spectacular stuff from the finance, legal and exec decision makers at SFC, Also explains the reason the Buttner deal fell through and possibly a centre half. As a misty eyed romantic that yearns for the days before agents took huge sums from our game I'd even say it was worth a deal or two falling through for the sake of cementing our stance on this. Also, I do believe last season we again were one of the lowest payers in the Championship?
Miltonaggro Posted 30 November, 2012 Posted 30 November, 2012 So, 7th highest spending in Europe but the lowest in the Premier League for agents' fees. Either NC is a fugging genius or there's another answer. Until I see evidence that this is true i don't think anyone should develop an opinion either way. This...
Miltonaggro Posted 30 November, 2012 Posted 30 November, 2012 So, 7th highest spending in Europe but the lowest in the Premier League for agents' fees. Either NC is a fugging genius or there's another answer. Until I see evidence that this is true i don't think anyone should develop an opinion either way. This...
Saint_clark Posted 30 November, 2012 Posted 30 November, 2012 So, 7th highest spending in Europe but the lowest in the Premier League for agents' fees. Either NC is a fugging genius or there's another answer. Until I see evidence that this is true i don't think anyone should develop an opinion either way. It's on the Premier Leagues website, what more evidence do you want? http://www.premierleague.com/en-gb/news/news/premier-league-release-agents-fees-nov-2012.html
Saint_clark Posted 30 November, 2012 Posted 30 November, 2012 So, 7th highest spending in Europe but the lowest in the Premier League for agents' fees. Either NC is a fugging genius or there's another answer. Until I see evidence that this is true i don't think anyone should develop an opinion either way. It's on the Premier Leagues website, what more evidence do you want? http://www.premierleague.com/en-gb/news/news/premier-league-release-agents-fees-nov-2012.html
JackanorySFC Posted 30 November, 2012 Posted 30 November, 2012 So, 7th highest spending in Europe but the lowest in the Premier League for agents' fees. Either NC is a fugging genius or there's another answer. Until I see evidence that this is true i don't think anyone should develop an opinion either way. Just wondering what you mean, unless I've missed something obvious new legislation means all agents fees have to be declared by law. Both clubs have to agree on every transfer what the fees are, I've checked this with an Agent I know (no prem players but a few in lower leagues where rules are the same) and that is 100% the case?
JackanorySFC Posted 30 November, 2012 Posted 30 November, 2012 So, 7th highest spending in Europe but the lowest in the Premier League for agents' fees. Either NC is a fugging genius or there's another answer. Until I see evidence that this is true i don't think anyone should develop an opinion either way. Just wondering what you mean, unless I've missed something obvious new legislation means all agents fees have to be declared by law. Both clubs have to agree on every transfer what the fees are, I've checked this with an Agent I know (no prem players but a few in lower leagues where rules are the same) and that is 100% the case?
Saint_clark Posted 30 November, 2012 Posted 30 November, 2012 It's great that we are not paying much to agents. Not so great if we get relegated because we couldn't land the defenders/keeper we needed because agents don't like dealing with us (if that is the case). I think it's a safe assumption that agents don't like us because they get f*ck all money from us, not because we are "difficult to deal with" as was always widely accepted.
Saint_clark Posted 30 November, 2012 Posted 30 November, 2012 It's great that we are not paying much to agents. Not so great if we get relegated because we couldn't land the defenders/keeper we needed because agents don't like dealing with us (if that is the case). I think it's a safe assumption that agents don't like us because they get f*ck all money from us, not because we are "difficult to deal with" as was always widely accepted.
jawillwill Posted 30 November, 2012 Posted 30 November, 2012 So, 7th highest spending in Europe but the lowest in the Premier League for agents' fees. Either NC is a fugging genius or there's another answer. Until I see evidence that this is true i don't think anyone should develop an opinion either way. I'm sure you'd hold the exact same opinion if we paid them the most...
jawillwill Posted 30 November, 2012 Posted 30 November, 2012 So, 7th highest spending in Europe but the lowest in the Premier League for agents' fees. Either NC is a fugging genius or there's another answer. Until I see evidence that this is true i don't think anyone should develop an opinion either way. I'm sure you'd hold the exact same opinion if we paid them the most...
The Kraken Posted 30 November, 2012 Posted 30 November, 2012 I have to say this is very interesting and if accurate, which we have to assume it is as Agent's fees are now transparent, it shows a refreshing approach to transfer deals. To sign the players we did paying that little in fees is nothing short of spectacular stuff from the finance, legal and exec decision makers at SFC, Also explains the reason the Buttner deal fell through and possibly a centre half. As a misty eyed romantic that yearns for the days before agents took huge sums from our game I'd even say it was worth a deal or two falling through for the sake of cementing our stance on this. Also, I do believe last season we again were one of the lowest payers in the Championship? Its all very well taking a moral stand against exorbitant agents fees. In a way I kind of applaud the notion. However, and very unfortunately, it is simply a way of life in football these days. Having various contacts in the game myself through some close friends, Ive heard some awful tales about agents, manager and bungs that make you despair for the game. One of my friends worked for a football agent for 4 or 5 years but left as he was disgusted with that whole side of the game. He now works for a football club, but he also knows that agents aren't going anywhere, if anything they'll only get stronger. And (most) football chairmen these days will look at the total cost of the deal, rather than scrutinise the add-ons. They don't really care if 25% goes to the agent as long as it means securing the right player. Unfortunately chasing a moral crusade and trying to change the game from within will simply put us at a disadvantage; there will, most of the time, be other clubs willing to pay agents fees that we aren't. Hats off for the effort, but I fear it will be futile unless there is much, much, much more scrutiny put on football and all of its hangers on.
The Kraken Posted 30 November, 2012 Posted 30 November, 2012 I have to say this is very interesting and if accurate, which we have to assume it is as Agent's fees are now transparent, it shows a refreshing approach to transfer deals. To sign the players we did paying that little in fees is nothing short of spectacular stuff from the finance, legal and exec decision makers at SFC, Also explains the reason the Buttner deal fell through and possibly a centre half. As a misty eyed romantic that yearns for the days before agents took huge sums from our game I'd even say it was worth a deal or two falling through for the sake of cementing our stance on this. Also, I do believe last season we again were one of the lowest payers in the Championship? Its all very well taking a moral stand against exorbitant agents fees. In a way I kind of applaud the notion. However, and very unfortunately, it is simply a way of life in football these days. Having various contacts in the game myself through some close friends, Ive heard some awful tales about agents, manager and bungs that make you despair for the game. One of my friends worked for a football agent for 4 or 5 years but left as he was disgusted with that whole side of the game. He now works for a football club, but he also knows that agents aren't going anywhere, if anything they'll only get stronger. And (most) football chairmen these days will look at the total cost of the deal, rather than scrutinise the add-ons. They don't really care if 25% goes to the agent as long as it means securing the right player. Unfortunately chasing a moral crusade and trying to change the game from within will simply put us at a disadvantage; there will, most of the time, be other clubs willing to pay agents fees that we aren't. Hats off for the effort, but I fear it will be futile unless there is much, much, much more scrutiny put on football and all of its hangers on.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now