CB Fry Posted 21 November, 2012 Share Posted 21 November, 2012 So who is the realistic one? The person who doesn't accept everything he reads without knowing both sides of it, or the one who is prepared to blindly accept what he reads without question or analysis? And in case it had not occurred to you, this is an internet forum where by definition people come and express their opinions. You can conclude that I am arguing for the sake of it and call it trolling if you wish. But isn't it easy to dismiss anybody who disagrees with you as being a troll? Regarding payment of bills, I would imagine that there was some reason the club had for withholding that last installment. Nobody on here knows the ins and outs of it, but some are quite happy to draw their own conclusions that the club must have acted on a whim. . All of this is directed at the judge in the case, yes? Just so we are clear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wes Tender Posted 21 November, 2012 Share Posted 21 November, 2012 All of this is directed at the judge in the case, yes? Just so we are clear. No. As usual you make 5 out of two plus two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CB Fry Posted 21 November, 2012 Share Posted 21 November, 2012 No. As usual you make 5 out of two plus two. So you accept the judgement as handed down? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wes Tender Posted 21 November, 2012 Share Posted 21 November, 2012 So you accept the judgement as handed down? Have I ever said that I didn't? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now