Jump to content

The January 2013 HCDAJFU thread...


Dibden Purlieu Saint

Recommended Posts

I reckon we'll go back in for Matt Phillips and Biyik (although QPR are reportedly interested - hopefully by the end of the month they'll be cut adrift at the bottom). If we could get those 2, plus either Friedel or Robinson, we'll be well set for the rest of the season.

 

Lallana and Puncheon are both doing really well at the moment, but we are very thin on the ground for quality cover in those positions. Phillips would provide the cover and competition they need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I reckon we'll go back in for Matt Phillips and Biyik (although QPR are reportedly interested - hopefully by the end of the month they'll be cut adrift at the bottom). If we could get those 2, plus either Friedel or Robinson, we'll be well set for the rest of the season.

 

Lallana and Puncheon are both doing really well at the moment, but we are very thin on the ground for quality cover in those positions. Phillips would provide the cover and competition they need.

 

Redknapp was at it again yesterday saying that QPR need to sign players but if they are too far adrift then he'll tell the owners not to waste their money as there'll be no point bringing anyone in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Redknapp was at it again yesterday saying that QPR need to sign players but if they are too far adrift then he'll tell the owners not to waste their money as there'll be no point bringing anyone in.

 

Spot on. Difficult to sell a club to a decent player if you're nailed on to go down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the paper keep suggesting defoe will go to QPR....why the hell would he...just plain ridiculous

 

the new one is darren Bent to QPR...but again, why would villa loan him to them and why would bent go there after the way arry dumped him out of spurs and slated him for missing a chance

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the paper keep suggesting defoe will go to QPR....why the hell would he...just plain ridiculous

 

the new one is darren Bent to QPR...but again, why would villa loan him to them and why would bent go there after the way arry dumped him out of spurs and slated him for missing a chance

 

I'm sure Bent would love to work with Redknapp again after their successful spell at Tottenham where he was a father figure to him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given

Clyne

Fonte

Kjaar

Tierney/shotton/naughton

Cork

Schneiderlin

Puncheon

Ramirez

Lallana

Lambert

 

Gazza

Shaw (left backs interchangeable)

Yoshida

Davis

Phillips

Rodriguez

Mayuka

 

Would perhaps be a good idea to get someone that can play left back and holding midfield two areas we have quality but not depth. Like a good perch or a fit Ryan Taylor HCDAJFU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given

Clyne

Fonte

Kjaar

Tierney/shotton/naughton

Gazza

Phillips

.

 

Given - where does this come from ? (Apart from Glasgow Saint)

Kjaar - ditto

Tierney/shotton/naughton - who ?/ who ? & who ?

 

Phillips - ? Presumably Matt Phillips, the perpetual link.

 

For CB I really hope we can sign more of a 'monster' for that postion. Another Jaidi, or younger Ken Monkou MKII fit the bill perfectly. Does such a beast exist within our price range though ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You just need a keeper and a centre back. Anything else I'd get on loan then buy in the summer. Keeper will be someone experienced on a 6 month deal paying hardly anything in a transfer fee. CB shouldn't be too expensive either as your first two arent that bad. I'd look for someone on loan ala Caulker last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have heard from my only inside info that a deal to sell lambert was agreed (for january) verbally...

 

but ADKINS has been leaned on to use him properly in HIS proper position more (im assuming afer this meeting recently where our results picked up)

 

I have also been told that NC decided against lambert going as he knew the uproar it would cause and that he is essential to us...believe it if you want but it was Adkins (apparently) who was keen on phasing lambert out....and like sharp in the NPC, J-rod is a player has has wanted for about a year...........

there you go...

 

up to you if you believe it

Edited by Thedelldays
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have heard from my only inside info that a deal to sell lambert was agreed (for january) verbally...but ADKINS has been leaned on to use him properly in HIS proper position more (im assuming afer this meeting recently where our results picked up)I have also been told that NC decided against lambert going as he knew the uproar it would cause and that he is essential to usbelieve it if you want but it was Adkins (apparently) who was keen on phasing lambert out....and like sharp in the NPC, J-rod is a player has has wanted for about a yearthere you go...up to you if you believe it

 

Cheers. I don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have heard from my only inside info that a deal to sell lambert was agreed (for january) verbally...

 

but ADKINS has been leaned on to use him properly in HIS proper position more (im assuming afer this meeting recently where our results picked up)

 

I have also been told that NC decided against lambert going as he knew the uproar it would cause and that he is essential to us...believe it if you want but it was Adkins (apparently) who was keen on phasing lambert out....and like sharp in the NPC, J-rod is a player has has wanted for about a year...........

there you go...

 

up to you if you believe it

 

It was something that I certainly thought could be true after the start of this season. How people would know this, I don't know though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have heard from my only inside info that a deal to sell lambert was agreed (for january) verbally...

 

but ADKINS has been leaned on to use him properly in HIS proper position more (im assuming afer this meeting recently where our results picked up)

 

I have also been told that NC decided against lambert going as he knew the uproar it would cause and that he is essential to us...believe it if you want but it was Adkins (apparently) who was keen on phasing lambert out....and like sharp in the NPC, J-rod is a player has has wanted for about a year...........

there you go...

 

up to you if you believe it

 

Not saying I don't believe you but anyone who feels Lambert should be sold is a complete f*cking moron. imo. That includes Nigel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have heard from my only inside info that a deal to sell lambert was agreed (for january) verbally...

 

but ADKINS has been leaned on to use him properly in HIS proper position more (im assuming afer this meeting recently where our results picked up)

 

I have also been told that NC decided against lambert going as he knew the uproar it would cause and that he is essential to us...believe it if you want but it was Adkins (apparently) who was keen on phasing lambert out....and like sharp in the NPC, J-rod is a player has has wanted for about a year...........

there you go...

 

up to you if you believe it

 

Lambert certainly didnt miss any meals over the summer, that was a bigger issue then anything else. FWIW I hear Rickie has a massive drive to end his career at the top level, but his professionalism goes wandering at times, meaning he doesnt take it easy over the summer.

 

Sure I put it on here over the summer not to discount Rickie leaving, heard a strong rumour on that front. Fwiw I am glad he didnt. Might explain why Rickie looked a bit of a different player for a bit but from what I gather there is no real issue with the gaffer.

 

Also TDD there was no spectacular meeting everyone keeps talking about, Nige just put his principles to one side after a bit of advice thats all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still a better short term option than Gazza IMHO

 

Probably but would prefer Freidel, he was still making top class saves this season whilst Given hasn't made many appearances this year and I thnk Given is a bit injury prone.

 

How about Scott Sinclair? Only two appearances for Man City so far, might be able to get a loan with view to a permanent signing.

 

a few out of favour players at City Lecott, Rodwell, Javi Garcia, might be worth some cheeky loan bids?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably but would prefer Freidel, he was still making top class saves this season whilst Given hasn't made many appearances this year and I thnk Given is a bit injury prone.

 

How about Scott Sinclair? Only two appearances for Man City so far, might be able to get a loan with view to a permanent signing.

 

a few out of favour players at City Lecott, Rodwell, Javi Garcia, might be worth some cheeky loan bids?

 

Lescott will be available, already snapped up by Everton more than likely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good idea, no pre-season, played 1 match in the year 2012, and people moan about Boruc being off the pace and overweight...

 

Thanks for the sarcasm, appreciated ... I didn't state that I thought we should go for him (personally I'd stick with gazza unless niemi comes out of retirement in the same shape as friedel or an equivalent keeper of that class turns up) I just thought it was worth noting that he was still available and had been talked about as a potential signing over the summer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was a top class keeper but worrying that a team in a similar position are letting him go?

 

That's just Paul Lambert showing what a tit he is. Guzan is also a good keeper but ignoring Given like this "to put pressure on his performances" is madness when they are in such a position...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's just Paul Lambert showing what a tit he is. Guzan is also a good keeper but ignoring Given like this "to put pressure on his performances" is madness when they are in such a position...

 

I don't particularly rate Guzan, and it seems odd after Given retired from international football.

 

Given or Friedel, either would improve the team in the short term. I'm just leaning towards Friedel though because he was immense for Spurs at the start of the season.

 

 

Doesn't seem very us to go for a 31 year old, also wouldn't we loose him for a month anyway in January?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't particularly rate Guzan, and it seems odd after Given retired from international football.

 

Given or Friedel, either would improve the team in the short term. I'm just leaning towards Friedel though because he was immense for Spurs at the start of the season.

 

 

 

Doesn't seem very us to go for a 31 year old, also wouldn't we loose him for a month anyway in January?

 

Strange things can happen when there's a chance you could miss out on the Premier League pot of gold at the end of the rainbow...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is sharp coming back in January or the end of the season

 

.......another good question !

 

He has scored a few goals but perhaps not as many as some people might have hoped /wished for. IMO he will stay at Forest for the rest of the season ..and then make a decision about his future.

He is well suited to Champiobship level and will continue to score goals, but I just don't see him as a Prem.regular.

 

The Lambert question is a real challenge. Whenever he eventually goes, lots of fans will be upset/angry/disappointed, but he admitted himself (in interview) that the pace of the Prem. is far greater than many (in the team) had anticipated. Except for the very best players, the average shelf life of the ordinary striker is 3-5 years. Ricky has already done that and more...

We, who recall the legend that was Ron Davies will never forget his first few seasons in the Div.1 (Prem.) in the late 1960's. He got a lot of "attention " from tough defenders and not a lot of protection from referees. He never regained his fantastic form in the later years, and everyone was wishing him back to his best.... but it never happened.

 

We have (almost certainly) seen the best of Ricky, and although I 'd love to see him go on a year or two more, in reality he has one more big " pay-day" and would be able to go out at the top.

 

It's a tough call....I seem to think that RL's finding it tough now, but Jay Rod was bought as his eventual replacement...and shouldn't be held back too long if he's to develop as he should.

 

One of those tough footballing decisions. Should RL go or stay?. In the end : You're dam*ed if you do.. .and dam*ed if you don't .

Edited by david in sweden
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't seem very us to go for a 31 year old, also wouldn't we loose him for a month anyway in January?

 

Both our present CB's are in that same generation. Fonte will be 29 at Christmas, and Hooiveld is already 29 (will be 30 in April 2013).

 

Nothing "wrong " with that but with an average age of 23+ in the present side, we need some real experience at the back ......and in that....I include the goalie, too.

Edited by david in sweden
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't particularly rate Guzan, and it seems odd after Given retired from international football.

 

Given or Friedel, either would improve the team in the short term. I'm just leaning towards Friedel though because he was immense for Spurs at the start of the season.

 

Yeah its very odd, Guzan in no way should be first choice ahead of Given, especially when Given has retired internationally for the first choice spot.

 

I'd take Friedel in a heart beat, the man is a machine in his early 40's and has at least 18 good footballing months ahead of him. Paul Robinson on a free would also be a blinder, he's got plenty of time at the top of his game, then Given who has had a few injuries recently (which makes me worry) but still is a class act. Cudicini 4th choice if that order of keepers doesn't come off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both our present CB's are in that same generation. Fonte will be 29 at Christmas, and Hooiveld is already 29 (will be 30 in April 2013).

 

Nothing "wrong " with that but with an average age of 23+ in the present side, we need some real experience at the back ......and in that....I include the goalie, too.

 

 

Bought when they were a bit younger though, I mean Fonte was 26 when we bought him and defenders usually peak later than strikers, isn't Michael Owen only 32?

 

I would also question a guy who went to Qatar, screams 'football mercenary' to me and might not be the right sort of character to have around a relegation battle, sounds much more like a QPR type signing to me.

 

Would much prefer us investing in an Ince or Phillips etc who have potential, than a free 31 year old who will probably only get worse.

 

Experience though at the back I agree with (along with quality) and in particular goalie, one of Given, Robinson or Freidel surely have to be looked at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah its very odd, Guzan in no way should be first choice ahead of Given, especially when Given has retired internationally for the first choice spot.

 

I'd take Friedel in a heart beat, the man is a machine in his early 40's and has at least 18 good footballing months ahead of him. Paul Robinson on a free would also be a blinder, he's got plenty of time at the top of his game, then Given who has had a few injuries recently (which makes me worry) but still is a class act. Cudicini 4th choice if that order of keepers doesn't come off.

 

Not a bad shortlist there is it. Hope one of them comes off.

 

A couple of years ago I'd have put Cudicini higher up that list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah its very odd, Guzan in no way should be first choice ahead of Given, especially when Given has retired internationally for the first choice spot.

 

I'd take Friedel in a heart beat, the man is a machine in his early 40's and has at least 18 good footballing months ahead of him. Paul Robinson on a free would also be a blinder, he's got plenty of time at the top of his game, then Given who has had a few injuries recently (which makes me worry) but still is a class act. Cudicini 4th choice if that order of keepers doesn't come off.

 

fridel would be a great signing. Still a quality keeper and the experience we need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.......another good question !

 

He has scored a few goals but perhaps not as many as some people might have hoped /wished for. IMO he will stay at Forest for the rest of the season ..and then make a decision about his future.

He is well suited to Champiobship level and will continue to score goals, but I just don't see him as a Prem.regular.

 

The Lambert question is a real challenge. Whenever he eventually goes, lots of fans will be upset/angry/disappointed, but he admitted himself (in interview) that the pace of the Prem. is far greater than many (in the team) had anticipated. Except for the very best players, the average shelf life of the ordinary striker is 3-5 years. Ricky has already done that and more...

We, who recall the legend that was Ron Davies will never forget his first few seasons in the Div.1 (Prem.) in the late 1960's. He got a lot of "attention " from tough defenders and not a lot of protection from referees. He never regained his fantastic form in the later years, and everyone was wishing him back to his best.... but it never happened.

 

We have (almost certainly) seen the best of Ricky, and although I 'd love to see him go on a year or two more, in reality he has one more big " pay-day" and would be able to go out at the top.

 

It's a tough call....I seem to think that RL's finding it tough now, but Jay Rod was bought as his eventual replacement...and shouldn't be held back too long if he's to develop as he should.

 

One of those tough footballing decisions. Should RL go or stay?. In the end : You're dam*ed if you do.. .and dam*ed if you don't .

 

Lambert will probably last longer than the average striker because his game is not centred around pace. He is working ever so hard at the moment, and is covering a lot of ground, particularly in wide areas. I would prefer him to concentrate his game more in and around the penalty area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lambert will probably last longer than the average striker because his game is not centred around pace.

He is working ever so hard at the moment, and is covering a lot of ground, particularly in wide areas. I would prefer him to concentrate his game more in and around the penalty area.

 

I don't think pace is the key question, but I watched him in both the Newcastle and Norwich games and he did seem to be struggling a bit.

I don't disagree with your other comment but he doesn't lack attention from opposing defenders and there isn't anyone else for them to bother about as Puncheon seems to plays out wide so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll throw this name out there: Dmytro Chygrynskiy. Who? Centre back playing in his second spell for Shakhtar who doesn't make their first team but was bought by Barcelona from Shakhtar a couple of years ago before being sold back. Think it was a pretty healthy sum, possibly around £20M, but has gone off the radar a bit. 26 years old, could be a good little signing for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...