Jump to content

Clattenburg


Thedelldays
 Share

Recommended Posts

Anyone know what he's accused of saying?

 

Don't know about Mikel, but yesterday morning Twitter (I know, I know.) had him calling Mata a "Spanish tw*t".

 

I think Chelsea might end up in a spot of bother over this.

 

Allegedly, a group of Chelsea officials and players went in to the referee's room after the match and a shout of "I'm gonna break your f***ing legs" was heard. It appears that this made it into Clattenburg's match report.

 

A steward was injured and taken to hospital following a push from a section of the crowd that was throwing stuff at the Utd players who were celebrating a goal.

 

Add to that having two players sent off, which means they failed to control their players and I think Chelsea might face some action.

 

Clattenburg will be exonerated I'm sure despite having a nightmare of a game. Sending off Torres for simulation when there was contact was a mistake and Utd's third goal was offside.

 

I suspect he'll be tarnished by this though. He might also struggle to get a gig refereeing Man Utd. or Chelsea for a while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't know about Mikel, but yesterday morning Twitter (I know, I know.) had him calling Mata a "Spanish tw*t".

 

I think Chelsea might end up in a spot of bother over this.

 

Allegedly, a group of Chelsea officials and players went in to the referee's room after the match and a shout of "I'm gonna break your f***ing legs" was heard. It appears that this made it into Clattenburg's match report.

 

A steward was injured and taken to hospital following a push from a section of the crowd that was throwing stuff at the Utd players who were celebrating a goal.

 

Add to that having two players sent off, which means they failed to control their players and I think Chelsea might face some action.

 

Clattenburg will be exonerated I'm sure despite having a nightmare of a game. Sending off Torres for simulation when there was contact was a mistake and Utd's third goal was offside.

 

I suspect he'll be tarnished by this though. He might also struggle to get a gig refereeing Man Utd. or Chelsea for a while.

 

At the end of the day it's just more game changing dodgy decisions that went Utd's way. That's what the FA have to look at

really because they get far,far more than their fair share of those.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the end of the day it's just more game changing dodgy decisions that went Utd's way. That's what the FA have to look at

really because they get far,far more than their fair share of those.

 

I agree Window Cleaner. Although my brother-in-law, who is a Man Utd. fan (born in Leamington, but that's OK because he supported them when they were s**t), will tell you that statistically that's not the case.

 

I regularly tell him that he can stick his statistics up his arse because my gut-feel tells me otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't blame him for the offside goal but the rest was all down to him. The second booking for Torres was a ridiculous overreaction. We were always told that you had to be absolutely certain before issuing a caution for simulation. In the last couple of weeks all the refs seem to be given them out like pizza coupons. Perhaps it's because of all the media coverage about alleged diving? As for the suggested language, according to the Mail Mikel was having a rant at him along the lines of 'aren't we allowed to question your decisions?'. Well actually, no. I just think the pressure got too much for Clattenburg and his thought processes began to suffer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't blame him for the offside goal but the rest was all down to him. The second booking for Torres was a ridiculous overreaction. We were always told that you had to be absolutely certain before issuing a caution for simulation. In the last couple of weeks all the refs seem to be given them out like pizza coupons. Perhaps it's because of all the media coverage about alleged diving? As for the suggested language, according to the Mail Mikel was having a rant at him along the lines of 'aren't we allowed to question your decisions?'. Well actually, no. I just think the pressure got too much for Clattenburg and his thought processes began to suffer.

 

 

The Telegraph published a table last season for yellow cards issued for diving. Gareth Bale was the worst offender with 2 cards,

probably why Clyne was afraid to get too near him on Sunday, Bale goes down easy apparently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry to disagree Whitey but I don't think the second booking for Torres was "a ridiculous overreaction". It really hurts me to agree with anything Alex Ferguson says, but he was right that Torres chose to go down. Even if it wasn't simulation it definitely was exaggeration which is a yellow card offence. Unfortunately, the mindset of most players these days (and again I'm agreeing with Ferguson!!) is that they would rather get a yellow card for an opponent than try to score themselves.

 

It may sound a bit harsh, but if a couple of players getting undeserved yellow cards rids the game of diving then frankly I think that's a price worth paying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing I found interesting when they were talking about this on 5Live this morning. They seemed to be saying he used the N word, and that if it's true that should be the end of his career. So it's a 4 game ban for a player and a lifetime ban for a ref?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Telegraph published a table last season for yellow cards issued for diving. Gareth Bale was the worst offender with 2 cards,

probably why Clyne was afraid to get too near him on Sunday, Bale goes down easy apparently.

 

Mrs. Bale won't be complaining then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry to disagree Whitey but I don't think the second booking for Torres was "a ridiculous overreaction". It really hurts me to agree with anything Alex Ferguson says, but he was right that Torres chose to go down. Even if it wasn't simulation it definitely was exaggeration which is a yellow card offence. Unfortunately, the mindset of most players these days (and again I'm agreeing with Ferguson!!) is that they would rather get a yellow card for an opponent than try to score themselves.

 

It may sound a bit harsh, but if a couple of players getting undeserved yellow cards rids the game of diving then frankly I think that's a price worth paying.

 

That goes beyond the instructions to referees which are that you have to be absolutely certain that no foul was committed. Don't forget that 'attempt to trip' is also a foul. Torres was actually kicked on the upper shin and although it might have looked much I have known a broken leg to happen from such a challenge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That goes beyond the instructions to referees which are that you have to be absolutely certain that no foul was committed. Don't forget that 'attempt to trip' is also a foul. Torres was actually kicked on the upper shin and although it might have looked much I have known a broken leg to happen from such a challenge.

 

Nope, it was a dive. This accepted wisdom that if there's contact of any kind it's ok to fall over is a complete joke. The sooner refs clamp down on people falling to the ground because somebodys bootlace brushed their leg the better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the players are such delicate little flowers they can't take a bit of bad language then make it zero tolerance. If the referee hears anyone swear it's a bookable offence, twice and they're off. And if the players don't like it, let them complain to their clubs and teammates for being such divs in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope, it was a dive. This accepted wisdom that if there's contact of any kind it's ok to fall over is a complete joke. The sooner refs clamp down on people falling to the ground because somebodys bootlace brushed their leg the better.

 

Whilst I applaud this view, there is also the opposite problem that refs often don't give free-kicks unless they have the "evidence" of a player falling over. Got to fix both of those at the same time. Also the idea that "contact" is what makes a foul a foul, and not (for example) forcing a player to hurdle a challenge to get out the way of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope, it was a dive. This accepted wisdom that if there's contact of any kind it's ok to fall over is a complete joke. The sooner refs clamp down on people falling to the ground because somebodys bootlace brushed their leg the better.

 

But your interpretation is not in the laws or guidance to referees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do we have playing in the Premier League a bunch of nancy boys since when has being called a spanish T.W.A.T. a racist slur, insult maybe, but racist no way. if calling the t word is racism, I have been racially abused quite a few times in my life. Grow up and be men you blinking nancy boys, Football is a mans game, next we will be having the game as a non contact sport.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see one allegation has been dropped by chelsea...but they have made a formal complaint to the FA about "inappropriate language" used by Clattenburg....

 

They are saying he called John Obi mikel a Monkey. I would be amazed if this was true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't forget that Chelsea have got some previous when it comes to lying in public about what a referee said or did. The top Swedish ref had to retire to protect his family from the morons who threatened him after Mourinho claimed in a press conference that he had seen the ref invite the Barca manager into his dressing room at half time. He later admitted that he hadn't really seen it but had been told about it by someone else on the Chelsea staff, but by then it was too late.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
I see now the other managers, with fergie leading are coming out and backing Clattenburg...I read someone this afty that there could be a possibility that chelsea players may have misunderstood him due to his Geordie accent

 

Yep, could have called him "nipper" for example. All sorts of possibilities but I agree with Ferguson that it's unlikely that there's been racism.

 

I think that this is nothing more than a misunderstanding that will blight the career of a decent ref.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, could have called him "nipper" for example. All sorts of possibilities but I agree with Ferguson that it's unlikely that there's been racism.

 

I think that this is nothing more than a misunderstanding that will blight the career of a decent ref.

 

There was a bloke on radio claimed that he said "I dont give a monkeys what you think" and the Brazillian guy thought he heard "I dont care what a monkey thinks".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
No charges to be brought against Clattenburg.

 

Chelsea are ****ing mugs.

 

actually having just listened to a report on this you cant blame Chelsea and i actually have some sympathy for them as they were in an impossible positon. They had to act on what one of their employees told them. It would have looked 100 times worse if Mikel had claimed he had been racially abused and they'd not reported it, especially in view of everything else that has gone one recently with them. I'm no fan of Chelsea but i dont see what else they could have done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

actually having just listened to a report on this you cant blame Chelsea and i actually have some sympathy for them as they were in an impossible positon. They had to act on what one of their employees told them. It would have looked 100 times worse if Mikel had claimed he had been racially abused and they'd not reported it, especially in view of everything else that has gone one recently with them. I'm no fan of Chelsea but i dont see what else they could have done.

 

As I understand it mikel did not hear it, it was Ramires who thought he heard something, checked with players closer to the action who heard nothing and still proceeded with the complaint.

 

from guardian:

 

Ramires claimed that he had heard Clattenburg call Mikel a "monkey", but neither Clattenburg nor the three other match officials, who could hear everything being said in their earpieces, heard the comment. The FA said that neither Mikel, who was much closer to the referee than Ramires, heard what it is suggested was said to him. Nor was there anything in the video evidence to support the allegation and nor did two other players, whose first language is English, hear anything untoward.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...