trousers Posted 24 October, 2012 Posted 24 October, 2012 Apologies if already posted (couldn't see it anywhere) http://sfcplayerstats.wordpress.com/2012/10/23/why-arent-we-picking-up-points/
Window Cleaner Posted 24 October, 2012 Posted 24 October, 2012 Apologies if already posted (couldn't see it anywhere) http://sfcplayerstats.wordpress.com/2012/10/23/why-arent-we-picking-up-points/ couldn't make much sense of that actually. Is he saying Danny Fox is nearly as good as Vidic because he has the same tackle and aerial duels won percentages.
Saint Garrett Posted 24 October, 2012 Posted 24 October, 2012 It's a pretty crap article. Any saints fan will tell you that we've not played particularly badly but mistakes are costing us.
supersonic Posted 25 October, 2012 Posted 25 October, 2012 That whole article could have been summed up in one sentence: Because we can't defend
Mowgli Posted 25 October, 2012 Posted 25 October, 2012 It's a pretty crap article. Any saints fan will tell you that we've not played particularly badly but mistakes are costing us. Not really. Most are blaming lack of defensive signings, formations, positions, substitutions and instructions from NC. I think there are two good points that come from this article that make it worth a read. The implication that the players we have are good enough and that you cannot play Rickie for 90 minutes every game without risking him.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now