Jump to content

Rickie on the bench? **** it, I've had enough, Adkins out.


Recommended Posts

Posted
Possibly, I am yet to decide. I will be ressurected though.

 

Just bumped another couple of threads so you get it all out the way now, can repent and start afresh soon.

 

Might be worth using the Forum Protection Scheme and coming back with a different user name.

Posted
Just bumped another couple of threads so you get it all out the way now, can repent and start afresh soon.

 

Might be worth using the Forum Protection Scheme and coming back with a different user name.

 

I'm not going to do that...no need. I am happy to continue as I am.

 

Let him without sin cast the first stone.

Posted
I'm not going to do that...no need. I am happy to continue as I am.

 

Let him without sin cast the first stone.

 

Admire the bullish approach Sir. Don't think I can find anymore good threads, are you aware of any that haven't been bumped that you wish to reveal, repent and be humbled for?

Posted
Admire the bullish approach Sir. Don't think I can find anymore good threads, are you aware of any that haven't been bumped that you wish to reveal, repent and be humbled for?

 

Can't think of any. There was that list of players who I said we should try and sign and you said were full of ****. That'd be a good one.

Posted
Can't think of any. There was that list of players who I said we should try and sign and you said were full of ****. That'd be a good one.

 

That's in the middle of a long tedious thread. We are looking for ones with stupid titles and a mongy first post that shows you up, any like that apart from what's floating around?

Posted
We controlled the first half with nothing to show for it. Why was this? I would venture because our best striker and debatably our best player was on the bench.

 

I also assume you're not reading it in context with the other threads?

 

Because we were away from home and West Ham defended fairly solidly whilst offering little in attack?

 

Had the same situation continued in the second half then it would have been a 0-0 draw or we might have won. We didn't loose the game because Lambert wasn't on the pitch, we lost it because the defence and gk f*cked up.

 

I was responding to this particular thread, it was a massive overreaction.

Posted
Because we were away from home and West Ham defended fairly solidly whilst offering little in attack?

 

Had the same situation continued in the second half then it would have been a 0-0 draw or we might have won. We didn't loose the game because Lambert wasn't on the pitch, we lost it because the defence and gk f*cked up.

 

I was responding to this particular thread, it was a massive overreaction.

 

Yes, in isolation of course this thread is an over-reaction. However, this was the straw that broke the camels back for me. I had seen week on week of strange decisions (imo) by Adkins, and this was the one where I thought "he's just not learning from his mistakes'.

 

They defended solidly because they didn't have any threat from JRod. If Lambert was playing I believe it would have been different but of course there is no way to prove this. However, we have more chance of scoring with our best player on the field, and the player who's game we base ourselves around.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...