Dibden Purlieu Saint Posted 26 November, 2012 Author Share Posted 26 November, 2012 I reckon you will rise again as an Adkins happy clappy. Possibly, I am yet to decide. I will be ressurected though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Charlie Posted 26 November, 2012 Share Posted 26 November, 2012 Possibly, I am yet to decide. I will be ressurected though. Just bumped another couple of threads so you get it all out the way now, can repent and start afresh soon. Might be worth using the Forum Protection Scheme and coming back with a different user name. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dibden Purlieu Saint Posted 26 November, 2012 Author Share Posted 26 November, 2012 Just bumped another couple of threads so you get it all out the way now, can repent and start afresh soon. Might be worth using the Forum Protection Scheme and coming back with a different user name. I'm not going to do that...no need. I am happy to continue as I am. Let him without sin cast the first stone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Charlie Posted 26 November, 2012 Share Posted 26 November, 2012 I'm not going to do that...no need. I am happy to continue as I am. Let him without sin cast the first stone. Admire the bullish approach Sir. Don't think I can find anymore good threads, are you aware of any that haven't been bumped that you wish to reveal, repent and be humbled for? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buctootim Posted 26 November, 2012 Share Posted 26 November, 2012 I'm not going to do that...no need. I am happy to continue as I am. Let him without sin cast the first stone. Its a tempting offer. I'll think about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dibden Purlieu Saint Posted 26 November, 2012 Author Share Posted 26 November, 2012 Admire the bullish approach Sir. Don't think I can find anymore good threads, are you aware of any that haven't been bumped that you wish to reveal, repent and be humbled for? Can't think of any. There was that list of players who I said we should try and sign and you said were full of ****. That'd be a good one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Charlie Posted 26 November, 2012 Share Posted 26 November, 2012 Can't think of any. There was that list of players who I said we should try and sign and you said were full of ****. That'd be a good one. That's in the middle of a long tedious thread. We are looking for ones with stupid titles and a mongy first post that shows you up, any like that apart from what's floating around? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dibden Purlieu Saint Posted 26 November, 2012 Author Share Posted 26 November, 2012 That's in the middle of a long tedious thread. We are looking for ones with stupid titles and a mongy first post that shows you up, any like that apart from what's floating around? Only cos you know that one will make you look stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dig Dig Posted 26 November, 2012 Share Posted 26 November, 2012 Only cos you know that one will make you look stupid. Hmmm, wasn't Dean Whitehead on your list? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dibden Purlieu Saint Posted 27 November, 2012 Author Share Posted 27 November, 2012 Hmmm, wasn't Dean Whitehead on your list? No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tpbury Posted 27 November, 2012 Share Posted 27 November, 2012 Look, on any bw hysterical thread, my point of view is "It'll be reet". And I stand by this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tajjuk Posted 27 November, 2012 Share Posted 27 November, 2012 We controlled the first half with nothing to show for it. Why was this? I would venture because our best striker and debatably our best player was on the bench. I also assume you're not reading it in context with the other threads? Because we were away from home and West Ham defended fairly solidly whilst offering little in attack? Had the same situation continued in the second half then it would have been a 0-0 draw or we might have won. We didn't loose the game because Lambert wasn't on the pitch, we lost it because the defence and gk f*cked up. I was responding to this particular thread, it was a massive overreaction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dibden Purlieu Saint Posted 27 November, 2012 Author Share Posted 27 November, 2012 Because we were away from home and West Ham defended fairly solidly whilst offering little in attack? Had the same situation continued in the second half then it would have been a 0-0 draw or we might have won. We didn't loose the game because Lambert wasn't on the pitch, we lost it because the defence and gk f*cked up. I was responding to this particular thread, it was a massive overreaction. Yes, in isolation of course this thread is an over-reaction. However, this was the straw that broke the camels back for me. I had seen week on week of strange decisions (imo) by Adkins, and this was the one where I thought "he's just not learning from his mistakes'. They defended solidly because they didn't have any threat from JRod. If Lambert was playing I believe it would have been different but of course there is no way to prove this. However, we have more chance of scoring with our best player on the field, and the player who's game we base ourselves around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now