Jump to content

Fee plus wages, which player has represented the biggest waste of money!


Nadia Sllim

Recommended Posts

Delgado pushed hard by Mark Draper.

 

I'd count Draper as pretty good value for money when compared to say Stuart Ripley.

 

He's a sports lawyer now you know, Stuart Ripley I mean.

 

Anyway with the Tinman costing us well north of 5 million £ for absolutely f all return all the rest are pretty academic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Marcelo Tajera

 

When we had no money, good old 'arry wasted 100,000 on a player he would never pick, and was available on a free transfer (Mcmenemy's son was the agent).

 

Harry is a Saint

 

A major South American club has admitted to The Independent that it received £100,000 from Southampton for a player who was actually available for nothing, in a transfer that has been reported to the Premier League's ongoing "bungs" inquiry as "suspicious".

 

So ****ing dodgy and wasteful, at a time we had so little.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We didn't pay anything for Kanchelskis. He came orginally just to train with us. Then Strachan gave him a 1 year contract at the start of 2012/13. But he left in the January transfer window. So in the scale of waste we are talking here he hardly registers. And we did win the one game he played in.

 

For me its Mark Hughes. What I hated most is that when he signed his agent said 'Southampton have never had a player like Mark Hughes' - because of course we never had a player who was voted European Footballer of the Year two years in a row. Because Hughes couldn't hack it as the striker he was signed as he had to drop back into midfield where he was useless. I always suspected that he had a 'must play' cause in his contract. His pathetic goalscoring was due to the fact that when chances came he always went for the spectacular 'look at me' volley rather than an easy tap-in. To be fair though, he did score the greatest goal that never was in our history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We didn't pay anything for Kanchelskis. He came orginally just to train with us. Then Strachan gave him a 1 year contract at the start of 2012/13. But he left in the January transfer window. So in the scale of waste we are talking here he hardly registers. And we did win the one game he played in.

 

For me its Mark Hughes. What I hated most is that when he signed his agent said 'Southampton have never had a player like Mark Hughes' - because of course we never had a player who was voted European Footballer of the Year two years in a row. Because Hughes couldn't hack it as the striker he was signed as he had to drop back into midfield where he was useless. I always suspected that he had a 'must play' cause in his contract. His pathetic goalscoring was due to the fact that when chances came he always went for the spectacular 'look at me' volley rather than an easy tap-in. To be fair though, he did score the greatest goal that never was in our history.

 

Little edit required?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kevin Phillips

He didn't want to come to us in the first place, saw the pound signs.

He even said after that he should not have signed for us.

How ironic he ended up with Brett Ormerod at Blackpool!!

 

We paid £3.25 million for Phillips and got £1 million when we sold him to Villa. £2.25 million for 22 league goals in 2 seasons is not fantastic value but way better than many of the names in this thread. In defence of Phillips, the job was not exactly as advertised. He was signed by Strachan who was gone within the season and he ended up playing for four managers including Arry who clearly took against him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

David hurst

 

actually .......it was David Hirst, and he played quite well the season prior to his injury.

A really freak training accident destroyed his knee joint and he never got back to any standard of fitness afterwards ----not his fault and not a waste of money, either.

 

I always felt that Charlie George was a big waste of money......£400K was A LOT of money ...in 1979. He was injured when we bought him and never got fit enough to perform on a regular basis.

 

(He was another sort of Delgado deal). Delgado felt he was fit enough to play, but Strachan never wanted to pick him, but it didn't stop him playing in the 2002 World Cup... .and scoring !

 

However, the biggest rip-off was Blackburn "unloading Speedie AND Dixon on us in the Shearer deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pahars - Latvian sicknote trading on past glories.

 

 

Bleidilis was a bigger waste, in fact I might put him down as runner up to Tinman.

 

looks like at least 2 members of the commission got it right then

 

 

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199900/cmselect/cmeduemp/218/0021628.htm

Edited by Window Cleaner
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd count Draper as pretty good value for money when compared to say Stuart Ripley.

 

£1.25m (sizeable at the time) and a hefty wage and we got just 23 appearances out if him over three long years. Ripley was slightly more expensive, but we at least got 53 games from him. Both were major wastes of money

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, he also got a 200k 'loyalty bonus' every year he was here as well.

 

I think Euell would certainly make the top 5. People like Hirst or Venison who signed then were finished by injury is just bad luck. And Delgado looked like he had all the attributes, but injury and not settling did for him. (And you can't count the likes of Bleidelis & Chala as they were there to hepl Pahars - which made him well worth it, or Delgado - which didn't!) Poor old Jason looked punch-drunk from day one - scared of the ball, mentally 'gone' & off the pace - if we'd taken him on a pay-as-you-play basis you might have accepted it, but as one of our highest ever earners it was tragic.

All of those Redknapp relegation signings - his son, Bernard etc certainly merit a mention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...