Jump to content

Fee plus wages, which player has represented the biggest waste of money!


Nadia Sllim

Recommended Posts

We didn t really pay a fee for forecast plus he didn't really come with expectations

 

I believe he was given to us in exchange for certain rights on Gareth Bale (Writing off sell on fees, future payment's etc in exhange for a lump sum and him.)

 

Along with his insane wages and absolute lack of ability he is the most stupid and ill judged transfer in our history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe he was given to us in exchange for certain rights on Gareth Bale (Writing off sell on fees, future payment's etc in exhange for a lump sum and him.)

Wrong.

 

We were desperate for cash, so we went begging to Spurs to settle the "conditional" parts of the Bale transfer (the original fee was £5m + add-ons up to another £5m). We settled for around £2.5m of that £5m and they threw Forecast into the mix as well for whatever reason. I suspect Forecast's agent was quite clever here, essentially blackmailing the club into giving him a 5-year deal (we never gave ANY player a 5-year deal, let alone one with no first-team experience) with the suggestion that if we didn't agree to it, the deal providing life-saving cash to the club would fall through.

 

There never was a sell-on clause in the Bale or Walcott deals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wrong.

 

We were desperate for cash, so we went begging to Spurs to settle the "conditional" parts of the Bale transfer (the original fee was £5m + add-ons up to another £5m). We settled for around £2.5m of that £5m and they threw Forecast into the mix as well for whatever reason. I suspect Forecast's agent was quite clever here, essentially blackmailing the club into giving him a 5-year deal (we never gave ANY player a 5-year deal, let alone one with no first-team experience) with the suggestion that if we didn't agree to it, the deal providing life-saving cash to the club would fall through.

 

There never was a sell-on clause in the Bale or Walcott deals.

 

Thankyou Steve.

 

I stand corrected, but still by my original judgement. The length of contract and wages compared to the talent acquired was insane nontheless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely, but it was a no-brainer of a deal for the club given the situation at the time.

 

Such a perverse favour by Spurs. Here's some money we don't need to give to you yet in exchange for settling a few appearance clauses and a 'promising' keeper......

 

All from the goodness of our hearts. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no debate to be had, Agustin Delgado is the single handed biggest waste of money. maybe even in premier league history. apparently he was on nearly 20k a week. add that to the fee of atleast £3,000,000.outrageous.

 

I'm sure Winston Bogarde would have something to say about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To answer the original question, Mark Hughes.

 

£850k transfer fee (quite a lot for us back then), £20k a week wages, two goals and about 500 needless yellow cards.

 

That's what I was going to say. He was unprofessional and ****e. And bloody expensive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously?? No chance.

 

He arrived with big expectations at the time, had an ok ish 1st season. Then got injured in the second and did not play after that. Maybe not the worse buy in history but we did smash our transfer record at the time and i was expecting big things for him. Had a good attitude but got a bad injury at the time which forced him to retire not long after.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rory delap

 

delay easily made his money back, his overhead scissor kick got us three points against spurs.

 

and we sold him on.

 

I can see the argument with forecast but he was signed as a 3rd gk on a free, and never git beyond 3rd gk. does anyone even know what he is/was on? surely with a youth gk the money only starts rolling after u make a first team start.

 

apart from van damme and Delgado it's a bit if a struggle, Delgado was always going to be a risk though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To name but a few Barry Venison, Luis Boa Morte, Agustin Delgado, Jelle VanDamme, Tommy Forecast, Jonathan Forte

 

Not sure you really understood the question.....

 

...Tommy Forecast must be the one for me. Others mentioned at least made a few appearances / goals for us. Tommy beats my other thought of Charlie George hands down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It probably is Mark Hughes although he did score a crucial goal in the 3-3 draw with Blackburn when we were 3-1 down and heading for relegation in '99 which could be said to have been worth all the money we spent on him!

 

Whenever I see Hughes I never think of him as an ex-Saint. Maybe it was his clear 'don't give a sh.it about being here attitude' which precludes me from registering his time with us with any lingering fondness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought Neil McCann was alright for us. Although tbf I rated Jermaine Wright at RB too.

 

McCann was gash apart from one game at Arsenal when he put 2 crosses onto Delap's head. (The one when Van Persie equalised in the 127th minute of stoppage time)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How much did we pay for Andrei Kanchelskis? I seem to remember seeing his only game for us instead of this pacy skillfull winger, I'd remembered him being, this fat bloke in an ill fitting saints shirt ambeled onto the pitch and did the square root of ****all and never played for us again.

Edited by doddisalegend
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...