Jump to content

Training Ground Development - "temporarily suspended"


Saint-Armstrong

Recommended Posts

Could be as a result of 100 different things. Building contractors are typically a nightmare to deal with. Possibly a Health and Safety lapse on their behalf?

 

Oi, I'm a building contractor! I know one of the subbies working on the job so have put a call out to him to see if he know whats going on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These stupid builders they are so unreliable. Well done to the club for not taking any nonsense and being decisive,

 

Well done for making a sweeping assumption towards the builders being at fault without any facts on the matter or knowing who is at fault. It could easily have been unreasonable demands from the club bearing in mind we have a CEO not renown for his empathy. Maybe you should wait for the facts first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone know what Staplewood was used for prior to it being our training ground? Was it just farmland?

 

Staplewood used to be the football ground of Road-sea (really nice facilities at the time - in the 80s/90s). A relatively young club that did really well, winning all sorts. I remember the son of the owner (Rob Price) used to go to school with my bro until his Dad divorced (I think) and his financial backing went and the club seemed to nose dive after that period. Shame really. The club sold the facilities in Marchwood to Southampton and the club use it for training and development, reserve team games, etc. and academy facilities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Home of RS Southampton FC I think

 

Staplewood used to be the football ground of Road-sea (really nice facilities at the time - in the 80s/90s). A relatively young club that did really well, winning all sorts. I remember the son of the owner (Rob Price) used to go to school with my bro until his Dad divorced (I think) and his financial backing went and the club seemed to nose dive after that period. Shame really. The club sold the facilities in Marchwood to Southampton and the club use it for training and development, reserve team games, etc. and academy facilities.
Cheers. But the site we're using, currently working on must be a fair bit bigger than the original RS ground?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Staplewood used to be the football ground of Road-sea (really nice facilities at the time - in the 80s/90s). A relatively young club that did really well, winning all sorts. I remember the son of the owner (Rob Price) used to go to school with my bro until his Dad divorced (I think) and his financial backing went and the club seemed to nose dive after that period. Shame really. The club sold the facilities in Marchwood to Southampton and the club use it for training and development, reserve team games, etc. and academy facilities.

 

I played for Road Sea a couple of times,towards the start of their ascendancy, went up like a bonfire night rocket and just sort of fizzled out at the top. I'd moved to Brussels by then so I never did quite understand what happened. We were f*cking good though even in the infancy of the side when I was in it..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is quiet rare that costruction work is suspended, other than for newts, artifacts, bombs or dead bodies. It will be interesting to know the reason.
All those, plus a fair few others, asbestos etc and potential contrator f**k ups on Health and Safety or quality of workmanship. Anyone know whhich company we are using to Project Manage the work on our behalf?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All those, plus a fair few others, asbestos etc and potential contrator f**k ups on Health and Safety or quality of workmanship. Anyone know whhich company we are using to Project Manage the work on our behalf?

 

Isn't someone on this board part of that set up, probably explains a lot really. Then again may be it's someone's brother, can't remember the details.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know someone who works for leadbitter in a managerial role and he mentioned a while ago that Cortese wasn't happy with the architect and was looking to replace him.

 

Also Cortese kept delaying signing the paperwork but a couple of weeks ago finally put pen to paper.

 

It should only be a minor blip I would have thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Suspending a principal contractor is normally a costly measure and as such used as an almost last resort. Once suspended more often than not termination follows but not always.

 

The club should have a project management consultancy practice advising them and managing the contract. Assuming this is the case I would have thought they would have made or at least be on board with the decision, assuming the decision was made by the club and not the contractor themselves which without knowing the facts could also be the case. If the termination worse case scenario follows and a new contractor needs to be sourced this would delay completion by anywhere up to 6 months plus and at considerably increased costs.

 

a point of note being who is the common denominator in all these disputes with contractors and newspapers etc? Cortese may well be in the right though and just not taking any carp, without knowing the background reasons we can only speculate. On balance though he seems to have done remarkably well since coming on board so without knowing the facts, it's probably unfair to lay the blame at his door as no doubt some people will automatically default to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know a great deal about the construction industry, but surely the architect's job is done once the plans have been submitted? Those plans were submitted months ago, so unless Cortese's suddenly decided he doesn't like something about the design (not beyond the realms of possibility), surely there's no need for an architect to be involved at this stage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know a great deal about the construction industry, but surely the architect's job is done once the plans have been submitted? Those plans were submitted months ago, so unless Cortese's suddenly decided he doesn't like something about the design (not beyond the realms of possibility), surely there's no need for an architect to be involved at this stage.

 

It entirely depends upon the job (and the architect of course) but I've been involved in quite a few large scale construction projects whereby the principal architect was involved throughout the duration of the project.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bet this goes like most rumours from the club..

 

Fitzhugh, hypo and Turkish all of a sudden say they have "heard about this"...we will go on to about 300 posts once MLG comes in.....then when the truth comes out, everyone will be way off the mark....

 

This ^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well done for making a sweeping assumption towards the builders being at fault without any facts on the matter or knowing who is at fault. It could easily have been unreasonable demands from the club bearing in mind we have a CEO not renown for his empathy. Maybe you should wait for the facts first.

 

Big lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bet this goes like most rumours from the club..

 

Fitzhugh, hypo and Turkish all of a sudden say they have "heard about this"...we will go on to about 300 posts once MLG comes in.....then when the truth comes out, everyone will be way off the mark....

 

:lol: bang on the mark.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know a great deal about the construction industry, but surely the architect's job is done once the plans have been submitted? Those plans were submitted months ago, so unless Cortese's suddenly decided he doesn't like something about the design (not beyond the realms of possibility), surely there's no need for an architect to be involved at this stage.

 

It entirely depends upon the job (and the architect of course) but I've been involved in quite a few large scale construction projects whereby the principal architect was involved throughout the duration of the project.

 

In large scale construction projects the architect is involved and required through to project completion. The bulk of the architect's work is done in drawing up the initial DA and subsequent construction drawing plans yes, but the design can and does change for a number of different reasons throughout a project and the architect is required to design these changes as and when they happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know a great deal about the construction industry, but surely the architect's job is done once the plans have been submitted? Those plans were submitted months ago, so unless Cortese's suddenly decided he doesn't like something about the design (not beyond the realms of possibility), surely there's no need for an architect to be involved at this stage.
Construction specifications always end up being full of grey areas that aren't always spotted at the time of tender, but do come to light when it comes to doing the physical work. As mentioned above, typically an employer will employ a Project Management firm to manage the Contractor on their behalf, but that role used to be carried out by the architect and that could well be the case in this instance.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bet this goes like most rumours from the club..

 

Fitzhugh, hypo and Turkish all of a sudden say they have "heard about this"...we will go on to about 300 posts once MLG comes in.....then when the truth comes out, everyone will be way off the mark....

I have heard nothing but that doesn't mean to say I can't say I am not surprised.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...