Jump to content

Saints v Fulham Build Up


Cheese on Toast

Recommended Posts

I thought Richardson was very poor on Saturday, I'd rather have Fox back in there I think,

 

Me too. Fox is frustrating and has been poor this season defensively, but I think he has the ability to do ok if he wises up, and is a good passer usually.

 

Richardson is a decent Championship player but not good enough and never will be, at this level.

 

Would rather Clyne went back to the right and Fox or Shaw come in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do you rate Chaplow over JWP?? JWP is good on the ball, can pass it and move about the pitch in decent ways. Chaplow is just short and bald with poor positioning and an average touch. Don't really see why Chaplow would get a start on Sunday if JWP is fit

 

I don't really know, just every time I see JWP, he just looks out of his depth, he's getting better so I'm sure in not too long he'll be a guaranteed starter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At risk of being controversial, I want to see Chaplow start. Without Morgan, we need a battling, tough, dare I say 'dirty' midfielder who will run, chase and fight for the ball for 90-minutes. We have pretty players who can do attractive things, we have players who can do the simple things well, but we lack bite in midfield, we lack a physical presence who will charge at the opposition just to win the ball.

 

Usch ! (naughty words).......you mean tough and uncompromising ...... sorry... Jimmy Case retired years ago ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't really know, just every time I see JWP, he just looks out of his depth, he's getting better so I'm sure in not too long he'll be a guaranteed starter

 

He's only starting due to the lack of Cork and Schniderlin, he'll get better with game time, best way for him to get the confidence up. Sticking an average Chaplow in his place probably will do more harm than good in my view.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Usch ! (naughty words).......you mean tough and uncompromising ...... sorry... Jimmy Case retired years ago ...

 

But the OP has a point, foulwise Morgan is our hatchet man, think he's run up about 9 or 10 fouls in his 5 games this season,

none of them particularly nasty no doubt but he puts himself about, lets the opposition know he's there and not a featherweight pansy.

Davis must have committed just 2 or 3 fouls so far and I don't think JWP has any at all on the counter. The ability to foul well should not be underestimated, especially if you can do it with just 1 yellow in 5 games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we have such a huge chance at the weekend to put a couple of points between us and the bottom

 

QPR away to WBA

Norwich away to chelsea

Wigan home to everton

Villa away to Spurs

 

 

we have to win this

 

lost count of how many of your must win games we lost in our two promotion seasons! ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It appears that Nigel prefers Reeves to both Shaw and Fox
Well we really don't know that yet. I think Adkins would like Reeves to be a back-up option there, but I'm expecting Fox to be back there for the Fulham game. I've never been a huge fan of Fox since we signed him, however I think he is getting a bit of a raw deal this year. Were we all that better defensively without him against Everton? Think his big problem at the moment is he's lost confidence, not easy to get that back though.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well we really don't know that yet. I think Adkins would like Reeves to be a back-up option there, but I'm expecting Fox to be back there for the Fulham game. I've never been a huge fan of Fox since we signed him, however I think he is getting a bit of a raw deal this year. Were we all that better defensively without him against Everton? Think his big problem at the moment is he's lost confidence, not easy to get that back though.

 

Fox has the ability - he just needs to concentrate more defensively.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Fulham are the kind of team that will suit us at home, they don't travel that well, they aren't great defensively and like us are far more suited to attacking/passing football. They also don't have any powerhouses bar Hangeland, especially in midfield.

 

Not sure the answer to our lightweight midfield is Chaplow, what with him being 5 ft 9 in and skinny. He also didn't spend much time in central midfield even in the championship. IF he's going to play anywhere it's instead of Puncheon, he might not offer as much going forward but would be a lot more disciplined defensively, especially to help counter Riise going forward.

 

Would like to see Boruc come in, think he's the best keeper we have and his experience and leadership will help the back four.

 

Yoshida needs to keep playing CB, I think Fox will come in because he's the best we have for LB. Adkins just needs to give him strict instructions to defend more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Richardson was pretty woeful I thought. Too slow on the ball and often gave it away. Totally let Jelavic go for the third goal.

 

He isn't a prem player.

 

Crikey, Kelvin Davies really has fallen from grace in your eyes? I think he'll start at home on Saturday an no way will Chaps get the nod over JWP. He hasn't figured in six games so far so will not be match fit and at best will come on for 15 minutes towards the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Crikey, Kelvin Davies really has fallen from grace in your eyes? I think he'll start at home on Saturday an no way will Chaps get the nod over JWP. He hasn't figured in six games so far so will not be match fit and at best will come on for 15 minutes towards the end.
Well Chaplow should certainly be match fit, due to his involvement in the League Cup. But you're right, he won't start ahead of JWP, as he's not a very good CM.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I rate Reeves as a footballer, and I thought he didn't look out of place at all in his cameo on Saturday. Every time I have seen him play he has performed well (both offensively and defensively). I would be more than happy for him to play on Saturday at left back with Clyne returning to right back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is it harsh? Just a fact. Saying that 11 cards would tend to indicate a referee who has lost control somewhat.

 

Nope he did not lose control, players time wasting, kicking the ball away, taking off their shirt, gobbing off at the referee, pulling back an opponent and then there were the fouls. So no, Clattenburg did well I thought with a bunch of idiots purporting to be professional footballers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ken, is that your opinion or a fact known to you?

 

Its a ludicrous assumption based on one sub appearance.

 

In fact, Adkins likes him so much that he didn't train with the first team in pre season despite doing so last year for msot of the season.

 

Yesterday in the U21s Shaw played LB. If Reeves was going to come into the team on Sunday he would have played there.

 

If any young player is at LB it would be Shaw not Reeves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is it harsh? Just a fact. Saying that 11 cards would tend to indicate a referee who has lost control somewhat.

 

He didn't lose control, the players were committing tackles that were clear yellow cards and West Ham's players were also time wasting. He had little choice other than to book them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It appears that Nigel prefers Reeves to both Shaw and Fox

 

Ken, is that your opinion or a fact known to you?

 

Yesterday's under 21 game was Shaw's return to football after an illness in which hospitalised him. Reeves being picked over Shaw for the Everton game doesn't mean Adkins prefers Reeves to Shaw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yesterday's under 21 game was Shaw's return to football after an illness in which hospitalised him. Reeves being picked over Shaw for the Everton game doesn't mean Adkins prefers Reeves to Shaw.

 

 

Blimey! All I was doing was pointing out that Adkins had chosen to bring on Reeves as sub at Everton instead of using Fox or Shaw ..... Didn't realise I was going to start a major controversy !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yesterday's under 21 game was Shaw's return to football after an illness in which hospitalised him. Reeves being picked over Shaw for the Everton game doesn't mean Adkins prefers Reeves to Shaw.

 

True, but none of us know who NA prefers in that position. Everton certainly seemed like an audition for Reeves and I wouldn't be surprised to see him in the side on Sunday.

 

Does anyone know if Shaw played the full 90 for the ressies yesterday, and if not who else played there?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True, but none of us know who NA prefers in that position. Everton certainly seemed like an audition for Reeves and I wouldn't be surprised to see him in the side on Sunday.

 

Does anyone know if Shaw played the full 90 for the ressies yesterday?/QUOTE]

 

Yep...

 

@Luke_shaw3: Shame about the score today but at least I got 90 minutes under my belt!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He didn't lose control, the players were committing tackles that were clear yellow cards and West Ham's players were also time wasting. He had little choice other than to book them.

 

In other words then he was not in control. Agood ref would have clamped down on this early on. Still it really isn't too important, a light hearted remark taken out of context by the official rep of the referees union.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...