Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Yes, it was hugely unlikely they'd win it and a great achievement, but there was a huge amount of luck and poor finishing from opposition involved, the sort of thing that can only happen in cup football. Great achievement yes, but in the same way Di Matteo winning it was, and I'm not convinced he's a wonderful manager just yet. Odd things happen in cups, that's why we all love cup football, it's erratic and the best team doesn't always win. That's why I think it's best to judge managers on league performance mainly.

 

How have Liverpool fared since he's left? They've been on a downward spiral and he gave them their best period since the 80's. He's also won La Liga (twice I think) with Valencia, out muscling the likes of Real and Barca.

 

He signed the likes of Torres, Alonso and Reina who were fantastic for them. Anyone who think's he's not a great manager is quite simply an idiot.

Posted
Rafa was the start of their decline IMO, but he jumped ship before it was obvious to everyone else.

 

Hardly his fault. Everyone around them was getting Billionaire Arabs, they got some stingy Yanks - all the other teams around them kicked on and they fell behind as they couldn't match the spending power. I bet Liverpool fans wish now that Benitez had stayed on and the new board armed him with a £100m kitty, rather than King Kenny.

Posted
Hardly his fault. Everyone around them was getting Billionaire Arabs, they got some stingy Yanks - all the other teams around them kicked on and they fell behind as they couldn't match the spending power. I bet Liverpool fans wish now that Benitez had stayed on and the new board armed him with a £100m kitty, rather than King Kenny.

 

 

They do, my Liverpool supporting mate said something pretty similar to this to me recently, he said the whole board wrangling thing was the downfall of the club and Rafa left because of this and the lack of investment. Liverpool fans and and football fans in general are 'grass is greener' types and Rafa was quickly forgotten when 'King' Kenny came in. My mate said that there is no way Liverpool would have bought the likes of Carroll, Henderson and Downing whilst if he was still in charge.

Posted (edited)
Rafa was the start of their decline IMO, but he jumped ship before it was obvious to everyone else.

 

Was that after winning the European cup, other trophies and coming 2nd in the league?

 

Did he not also contribute to them buying a lot of crap. (Don't get me wrong I do think he's a good manager)

 

He won the Champions League, FA Cup, European Super Cup and came 2nd in the Premier League with Liverpool, I think if he did that for Saints we'd forgive him no matter how many "crap" signing he made... ;)

 

He also won the Spanish title twice and UEFA Cup with Valencia and the World Club Cup with Inter Milan.

Edited by Matthew Le God
Posted (edited)
Did he not also contribute to them buying a lot of crap. (Don't get me wrong I do think he's a good manager)

 

Hmmn he was hit and miss in transfers, he bought the likes of Torres, Reina, Alonso, Agger, Mascherano, Lucas Leiva, Dirk Kuyt, Skrtel,

 

Other were not so good like Arbeloa (although now world cup winner!) Morientes and Luis Garcia didn't quite hit it off but did ok. , he bought Crouch who did ok, Glen Johnson?

 

Out right flops - Robbie Kean, Ryan Babel, Andrea Dossena, Aquilani

 

£229 million in 5 years for 76 players. - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1221975/Rafa-Benitezs-229m-spending-spree-The-76-players-signed-Liverpool-managers-reign.html

Edited by tajjuk
oops
Posted
Hmmn he was hit and miss in transfers, he bought the likes of Torres, Reina, Alonso, Agger, Mascherano, Lucas Leiva, Dirk Kuyt, Skrtel,

 

Other were not so good like Arbeloa (although now world cup winner!) Morientes and Luis Garcia didn't quite hit it off but did ok. , he bought Crouch who did ok, Glen Johnson?

 

Out right flops - Robbie Kean, Ryan Babel, Andrea Dossena, Aquilani

 

£229 in 5 years for 76 players. - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1221975/Rafa-Benitezs-229m-spending-spree-The-76-players-signed-Liverpool-managers-reign.html

 

Looking through that list, it was impressive to begin with but then the last 3 years spent a lot of money on very average players.

Posted
Looking through that list, it was impressive to begin with but then the last 3 years spent a lot of money on very average players.

 

Most are just squad players though, his big errors were letting Alonso go and getting Aquilani to replace him and spending £20 million on Robbie Keane, apparently though rumours are that this was part of some sort of tit for tat between him and the boardroom.

Posted
Most are just squad players though, his big errors were letting Alonso go and getting Aquilani to replace him and spending £20 million on Robbie Keane, apparently though rumours are that this was part of some sort of tit for tat between him and the boardroom.

 

I don't think I will ever believe it was Rafa's choice to sell Xabi Alonso.

Posted
Guillem Balague ‏@GuillemBalague

 

Nothing at all in the link of Rafa Benitez and Southampton

 

This, plus what Adam Blackmore said should make threads like this pointless. Hopefully we get some points on the board at the weekend so next week we won't get this of trash.

Posted

I really do wonder at some of our posters and their grip on reality. They seem to package up opinion as fact.

 

Benitez is in a different league than Nigel Adkins. I hope Nigel grows the club and is with us in 10 years time, but come his retirement from the game, if he's achieved half of what Benitez has he'll be the most sucsessful English manager for a generation. I can understand people saying Benitez is not for us my , but you cant knock what he's a achieved in the game. If NC is looking to replace Nigel, then the players will be impressed if a man with Benitez's CV walks through the door to replace him.

 

For those saying it's unfair to judge NA on 4 games. 4 games is a lot more than Nigel judged Deano and Billy Sharp on. Football is ruthless..........

Posted
I really do wonder at some of our posters and their grip on reality. They seem to package up opinion as fact.

 

Benitez is in a different league than Nigel Adkins. I hope Nigel grows the club and is with us in 10 years time, but come his retirement from the game, if he's achieved half of what Benitez has he'll be the most sucsessful English manager for a generation. I can understand people saying Benitez is not for us my , but you cant knock what he's a achieved in the game. If NC is looking to replace Nigel, then the players will be impressed if a man with Benitez's CV walks through the door to replace him.

 

For those saying it's unfair to judge NA on 4 games. 4 games is a lot more than Nigel judged Deano and Billy Sharp on. Football is ruthless..........

 

NA judged them in every match and training session they played in for Saints.

 

Do any fans think that Hammond or Sharp will ever be a good Premier League player? Pretty sure we were all in agreement that they won't, certainly in Hammond's case.

 

Adkins however, has us playing some great football and could well be a success in the Prem - in the four games so far we have showed promise, and its pretty clear to most sensible people that we should judge once he has been able to embed his signings and has been able to play some of the type of teams we have a genuine chance of getting points from.

Posted
NA judged them in every match and training session they played in for Saints.

 

Do any fans think that Hammond or Sharp will ever be a good Premier League player? Pretty sure we were all in agreement that they won't, certainly in Hammond's case.

 

 

And NC has been judging Nigel since he set foot in the door.

 

I dont believe Sharp or Hammond were good enough and fully support ditching them. My point is that maybe NC feels the same about Nigel. Nigel is paid to make judgement calls like that and NC is also in a position that requires him to do the same. I'm not saying he should get rid of NA, merely pointing out that if he does he's just making a judgement call on NA ability in the top flight. Nigel didn't give Deano or Billy Sharpe 12 games to prove themselves he went with his gut feeling and from what he's seen in the past. NC will be doing the same.

Posted
And NC has been judging Nigel since he set foot in the door.

 

I dont believe Sharp or Hammond were good enough and fully support ditching them. My point is that maybe NC feels the same about Nigel. Nigel is paid to make judgement calls like that and NC is also in a position that requires him to do the same. I'm not saying he should get rid of NA, merely pointing out that if he does he's just making a judgement call on NA ability in the top flight. Nigel didn't give Deano or Billy Sharpe 12 games to prove themselves he went with his gut feeling and from what he's seen in the past. NC will be doing the same.

 

 

Of course NC makes a judgement call on Adkins. But he also knows we had a very tough start and Im sure wouldn't have expected a whole lot more than we got (probably as we all know, 3 points would have been very good).

 

Hence, he will give NA at least the next few matches to show he can do it at this level - and no reason to doubt that based largely on a thrashing by a very good Arsenal team.

Posted

As much as having Benitez would be quite cool (Even though losing Adkins would be a bit of a bummer), I think people should take into account that Benitez and his people have been whoring him around for any and every half decent job going since he got sacked by Inter. Constantly putting himself in the media around the same time his name gets linked to a job is not a coincidence. I have a mate who did some work for the Guardian for a few months and he told me that Benitez's representatives were constantly telling the Guardian and other media outlets that he was interested or being considered for jobs.

 

Clever but a bit annoying and should make people take links like this with a pinch of salt.

Posted
I really do wonder at some of our posters and their grip on reality. They seem to package up opinion as fact.

 

Benitez is in a different league than Nigel Adkins. I hope Nigel grows the club and is with us in 10 years time, but come his retirement from the game, if he's achieved half of what Benitez has he'll be the most sucsessful English manager for a generation. I can understand people saying Benitez is not for us my , but you cant knock what he's a achieved in the game. If NC is looking to replace Nigel, then the players will be impressed if a man with Benitez's CV walks through the door to replace him.

 

For those saying it's unfair to judge NA on 4 games. 4 games is a lot more than Nigel judged Deano and Billy Sharp on. Football is ruthless..........

 

Quite. Incredible that some are saying Benitez isn't good enough for us and wouldn't want him, truely incredible.

Posted

NA is a young manager and had no experience at this level. He has made mistakes, and will make more. But he's a good intelligent manager, and will learn quickly from these mistakes, as he has done in the past.

 

It's sad to hear all this talk of who his replacement is going be, after 4 games at this level.

Posted
Quite. Incredible that some are saying Benitez isn't good enough for us and wouldn't want him, truely incredible.

 

Anyone saying Benitez isnt good enough is a fool, but equally saying that it would be pointless sacking NA now is a fair opinion.

Posted
Anyone saying Benitez isnt good enough is a fool, but equally saying that it would be pointless sacking NA now is a fair opinion.

 

 

what pointless like sacking AP or loaning out Billy Sharp you mean? You never can tell at SFC these days.

Posted
what pointless like sacking AP or loaning out Billy Sharp you mean? You never can tell at SFC these days.

 

Sacking AP was a good decision, worked out best for both parties and loaning out Sharp is very logicial - he wouldnt have got many games.

Posted
Yes, it was hugely unlikely they'd win it and a great achievement, but there was a huge amount of luck and poor finishing from opposition involved, the sort of thing that can only happen in cup football. Great achievement yes, but in the same way Di Matteo winning it was, and I'm not convinced he's a wonderful manager just yet. Odd things happen in cups, that's why we all love cup football, it's erratic and the best team doesn't always win. That's why I think it's best to judge managers on league performance mainly.

 

Huge luck, as was getting to the again 2 years later. Just like making Valencia la Liga champions twice, the only club to have won La Liga other than Barcelona or Real since 2000. All just because of a huge amount of luck.

Posted
Spot on???? Lordswoodsaints admits that the entire post was based purely on his speculation and you dress it up as fact, presumably on the grounds that your thoughts echo his?

 

So pray tell us the background reasons why the pre-transfer window signings didn't materialise? We know that there were widely reported reasons for failing to sign Buttner, but it isn't even clear to anybody posting on here exactly what the fly in the ointment was, just speculation again. So what was the situation regarding the others? Chapter and verse please regarding who we were after and the reasons why they didn't sign. And you'd bet the shirt off your back that the signings we did make weren't the ones that Adkins wanted too? Based on what, exactly?

 

Others on here have posted their opinion as fact that Cortese is ruthless, that opinion being based on the sacking of Pardew for reasons that have never been made clear in the public domain. He might well be single-minded, focussed, ambitious, quite possibly he is ruthless, but I am yet to see anything that he has done which endorses that epithet being attached to him. If he were to sack Adkins at this early stage, then he could be deemed to be ruthless. But there is no evidence that that is his intention, so unless somebody can come up with a reasonable explanation for why they consider him ruthless, can we please stop making things up?

 

I have a contact who worked closely with him, was treated really well but gave up in the end. 'He was hard to work for'. As for the Bristol Rovers episode, I know what happened and NC had no choice. The same outcome in any company in the land. I think he doesn't take any prisoners.

Posted
Sacking AP was a good decision, worked out best for both parties and loaning out Sharp is very logicial - he wouldnt have got many games.

 

Nobody was to know that. We took a big gamble sacking him and Newcastle took an even bigger gamble hiring him.

 

If we sack Adkins now, get a manager in who actually addresses our areas of weakness in January and guides us to a mid-table finish, then sacking NA would also be a good decision. Who knows, Adkins could well keep us up but is NC willing to take that gamble, or will he gamble on a more experienced manager doing the business?

Posted
I have a contact who worked closely with him, was treated really well but gave up in the end. 'He was hard to work for'. As for the Bristol Rovers episode, I know what happened and NC had no choice. The same outcome in any company in the land. I think he doesn't take any prisoners.

 

Well if you know what happened then why not say? It's not like it will matter now.

Posted
Spot on???? Lordswoodsaints admits that the entire post was based purely on his speculation and you dress it up as fact, presumably on the grounds that your thoughts echo his?

 

So pray tell us the background reasons why the pre-transfer window signings didn't materialise? We know that there were widely reported reasons for failing to sign B, but it isn't even clear to anybody posting on here exactly what the fly in the ointment was, just speculation again. So what was the situation regarding the others? Chapter and verse please regarding who we were after and the reasons why they didn't sign. And you'd bet the shirt off your back that the signings we did make weren't the ones that Adkins wanted too? Based on what, exactly?

 

Others on here have posted their opinion as fact that Cortese is ruthless, that opinion being based on the sacking of Pardew for reasons that have never been made clear in the public domain. He might well be single-minded, focussed, ambitious, quite possibly he is ruthless, but I am yet to see anything that he has done which endorses that epithet being attached to him. If he were to sack Adkins at this early stage, then he could be deemed to be ruthless. But there is no evidence that that is his intention, so unless somebody can come up with a reasonable explanation for why they consider him ruthless, can we please stop making things up?

 

No point Les, they'd just be a rag tag collection of mercaneries you'd never heard of.

Posted
I don't rate Benitez. Apart from fluking the CL his teams were garbage.

 

Whatabout getting to the final again 2 years later?

 

Of his Valencia team which won La Liga twice?

 

All just luck? All garbage teams?

Posted
Whatabout getting to the final again 2 years later?

 

Of his Valencia team which won La Liga twice?

 

All just luck? All garbage teams?

 

I just think his Liverpool sides were generally sh!te. Brought some dire players.

Posted (edited)
I just think his Liverpool sides were generally sh!te. Brought some dire players.

 

Apart from the one which won the champions league and got to the final two years later. And the one that one the FA Cup and trhe one which finished second in the league and finished in the top 4 every season he was there, apart from the last, you mean?

Edited by Turkish
Posted
Apart from the one which won the champions league and got to the final two years later. And the one that one the FA Cup and trhe one which finished second in the league you mean?

 

I just don't think a past it old manager like Benitez is what we need. I don't want Redknapp either but think he would get more out our players.

Posted
Apart from the one which won the champions league and got to the final two years later. And the one that one the FA Cup and trhe one which finished second in the league you mean?

 

:lol::lol:

 

Its "Kelvin for England" all over again!

Posted
Who the f*ck thinks Kelvin should be in the England team!

 

Oh aintforever, you must have missed the end of last season's high jinx on here. Kelvin for the England squad for the Euros was the mantra being trotted out by more than a few lone nutters!

Posted
Well if you know what happened then why not say? It's not like it will matter now.

 

Must be element of wrong doing on Pardews part. If he felt it was unjust, why hasn't he ever come out and say?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...