Saint in Paradise Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 Will I get my head removed for treason after posting this link? You have to wait until sometime Friday for them to appear and I have no idea about the quality of the photos as I haven't seen them yet either. http://www.closermag.fr/content/71952/seulement-dans-closer-kate-et-william-leurs-vacances-tres-hot-en-provence?show=0 . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintbletch Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 Personally, I think it'll be nice to see the Royal couple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pap Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 Personally, I think it'll be nice to see the Royal couple. One could argue that with the jubilee, the Royals are already over-exposed. But then, one could argue that Kate's jubblies are under-exposed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scotty Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 Lets hope Pippa was along for the ride. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tokyo-Saint Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 A love a nice royal unveiling.* *prepares bunting and small flag. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Upwind Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 So were are the photo's.......... Any links? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ampersound Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 A love a nice royal unveiling.* *prepares bunting and small flag. *prepares tissues or a sock! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintbletch Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 So were are the photo's.......... Any links? Very much this. But I only want to look so that I can then be outraged. I won't enjoy it. I therefore wanted to remind Saint in Paradise about Rule 1, but I remembered that the bear posted TMS Diktat #872.b in another thread stating that certain uses of Rule 1 were illegal in TMS - with consequences. I think it could be that if I remind Saint in Paradise about Rule 1, then he must post pictures of himself topless or it might be that I then have to then post pictures of myself topless or some combination thereof. What was the new TMS rule about rule 1 Bearsy/Tokyo-Saint? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Upwind Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 http://www.jeanmarcmorandini.com/sites/jeanmarcmorandini.com/files/corps/closer_ne.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintbletch Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 http://www.jeanmarcmorandini.com/sites/jeanmarcmorandini.com/files/corps/closer_ne.jpg I am outraged! Back in a minuite... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suhari Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 Well I fully intend on cracking one out to the future Queen. Don't think she's that special, but it's something to tell the kids about in a few years. Now, if someone can post a link..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The9 Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 Gosh, they look like a pair of breasts, who'd have thought it. If it's not Pippa's ar5e, I'm not interested. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tokyo-Saint Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 People go on about the great summer of sport we have had but what a great summer for naked royals as well. Who would have thought it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wiggles31 Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 http://egotastic.com/photos/kate-middleton-topless-in-closer-magazine/kate-middleton-topless-closer-06/ Pretty terrible pictures but I can get around that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scotty Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 http://egotastic.com/photos/kate-middleton-topless-in-closer-magazine/kate-middleton-topless-closer-06/ Pretty terrible pictures but I can get around that. Judging by the earlier pics on Closer's own site, somebody has already been busy with the photoshop sharpening tool.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The9 Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 Would it be better or worse if she'd been photographed in one of these ? : http://www.ebay.co.uk/sch/iwayellow/m.html?hash=item3cca9843ca&item=261097014218&pt=LH_DefaultDomain_3&rt=nc&_trksid=p4340.l2562 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bpsaint Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 As disappointing as I thought they'd be. Shame. Would still love spot of ménage a trios with her and Pippa though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 Why are they allowed to get away with publishing photos of people topless? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scotty Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 As disappointing as I thought they'd be. Shame. That was my reaction initially, but look again, theyre sexier than you think. Theres even one of her rubbing oil into her c*nt! ...or, as she calls him, "Wills". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pap Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 Why are they allowed to get away with publishing photos of people topless? Girls boobs really not a big deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tokyo-Saint Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 Why are they allowed to get away with publishing photos of people topless? Guess it is fine under French law as I think it is here. It will be in the Sun for you to see on Monday (if not Sunday). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Charming Man Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 Laaaaavly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buctootim Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 Girls boobs really not a big deal. People making millions from invading other peoples privacy not a big deal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tokyo-Saint Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 People making millions from invading other peoples privacy not a big deal? Not unless we change the law. Don't see why she is any different than Kate Moss, Lily Allen, Jennifer Aniston etc who all got snapped with their baps out on holiday. She must have known there was a reasonable chance this would happen. If not he MUST have known, having a whole life of it. Not saying it is right, just saying that until the law is changed, there is a good chance that this will happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatch Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 Why did she have them out in the first place, all the bodyguards and staff would all been hiding in the bushes knocking one out as well. Must have been a hell of a crowd in those bushes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lighthouse Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 She should have just done a topless photoshoot for Maxim when she got engaged to Will, then nobody would give a sh*t about this kind of stuff. She gets more privacy whilst the rest of us get some HD pictures to bash one off over. Everyone a winner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 Girls boobs really not a big deal. Probably a big deal to her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 Not unless we change the law. Don't see why she is any different than Kate Moss, Lily Allen, Jennifer Aniston etc who all got snapped with their baps out on holiday. She must have known there was a reasonable chance this would happen. If not he MUST have known, having a whole life of it. Not saying it is right, just saying that until the law is changed, there is a good chance that this will happen. Seems a messed up law to me. It shouldn't be allowed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tokyo-Saint Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 If it was ever going to be changed, it would have been during the phone hacking thing, invasion of privacy etc. It wasn't so can't see it happening any time soon. Not a big vote winner, people like to see celeb baps (we all clicked on it after all!) so not party will put it in their manifesto as something they will do when in power. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scotty Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 I think that Pippa should moon the paparazzi in retaliation. Family honour is at stake here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearsy Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 NDon't see why she is any different than Kate Moss, Lily Allen, Jennifer Aniston etc who all got snapped with their baps out on holiday. Dunno bout that Tokyos. I don't like to disagree with you in general but them birds what make a living out of people wanting to look at their nawks like Jennifer Anistons i reckon are fair game but them other birds like Kate Middletons what is making her living out of marrying princes i reckon her nawks are private. While I will be looking at these pictures I am gonna take a moral stand and not crack one off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buctootim Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 (edited) Seems a messed up law to me. It shouldn't be allowed. Not sure about the law but the code of conduct agreed with Press Complaints Commission is that anybody in a public place (like a beach) is fair game but that newspapers shouldn't intrude into private places like houses. Magazines routinely ignore the agreement because the profits outweigh any fines and pay people to scramble through bushes taking peeping tom pictures. I like to see a pair of norks as much as anyone but public demand doesnt make behaviour like this right - anymore than public demand for porn makes rape okay. Consent is everything. Yeah I know its the muppet show and dont expect anyone to agree with me, but that my view. Edited 14 September, 2012 by buctootim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 Not sure about the law but the code of conduct agreed with Press Complaints Commission is that anybody in a public place (like a beach) is fair game but that newspapers shouldn't intrude into private places like houses. Magazines routinely ignore the agreement because the profits outweigh any fines and pay people to scramble through bushes taking peeping tom pictures. I like to see a pair of norks as much as anyone but behaviour like this isnt right - anymore than liking sex makes rape okay. Yeah I know its the muppet show and dont expect anyone to agree with me, but that my view. This is basically my view, if your in public than how can you complain about being caught in the nuddy ? But the difference comes when you believe you are in private. I wouldnt want anyone taking a picture of me poking stuff up my bum in private, but if I did it on a public beach how can I argue ? Just so we are clear is your garden a public or private place ?.... Ill put the lego away otherwise Nb I may or may not poke stuff up My bum Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearsy Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 Not sure about the law but the code of conduct agreed with Press Complaints Commission is that anybody in a public place (like a beach) is fair game but that newspapers shouldn't intrude into private places like houses. Magazines routinely ignore the agreement because the profits outweigh any fines and pay people to scramble through bushes taking peeping tom pictures. I like to see a pair of norks as much as anyone but public demand doesnt make behaviour like this right - anymore than public demand for porn makes rape okay. Consent is everything. Yeah I know its the muppet show and dont expect anyone to agree with me, but that my view. thats very interesting tim you've raised a very important point there bout whether the correct spelling is norks or nawks Where's bletch? he's always got the dictionary handy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tokyo-Saint Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 This is basically my view, if your in public than how can you complain about being caught in the nuddy ? But the difference comes when you believe you are in private. I agree 100% with this. Like the prince getting stitched up by those crack ***** whores in Vegas. It must have crossed his mind to say "look, Sliver, Crystal and Sandy, If I do not my royal chopper out and play the plate game, you have to promise to turn your iphones off. Deal?" To then take photos of him in his room is a stitch up. If he had run through the lobby afterwards singing "I'm gonna be king" while flashing, he would have been fair game in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buctootim Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 (edited) thats very interesting tim you've raised a very important point there bout whether the correct spelling is norks or nawks Where's bletch? he's always got the dictionary handy! I think I can answer your earnest philogical inquiry. Edited 14 September, 2012 by buctootim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tokyo-Saint Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 Dunno bout that Tokyos. I don't like to disagree with you in general but them birds what make a living out of people wanting to look at their nawks like Jennifer Anistons i reckon are fair game but them other birds like Kate Middletons what is making her living out of marrying princes i reckon her nawks are private. While I will be looking at these pictures I am gonna take a moral stand and not crack one off. Are you seriously trying to make us believe you won't have a royal w'ank over this? What If I were to send you the full action video, would that change your stance? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearsy Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 yeah send me the video tokyos and i'll let you know. Level with me tho, I mean they ain't very sexy pictures though is they? I mean is anyone actually gonna give them the treatment? I know it sounds gay, but sometimes I think boobs look more sexy when they is still in the clothes/bras. Like I'd more easily crack one off to that video bletch just posted than them pictures of Middletons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tokyo-Saint Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 yeah send me the video tokyos and i'll let you know. Level with me tho, I mean they ain't very sexy pictures though is they? I mean is anyone actually gonna give them the treatment? I know it sounds gay, but sometimes I think boobs look more sexy when they is still in the clothes/bras. Like I'd more easily crack one off to that video bletch just posted than them pictures of Middletons. What? Where? I may have missed it as I thought it was a repeat of count down or something. Where is it? *off to search Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearsy Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 Oops when I said bletch i meant tims! I mean, bletch probably just has done a sex video too but i ain't allowed to see them after last time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tokyo-Saint Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 Oops when I said bletch i meant tims! I mean, bletch probably just has done a sex video too but i ain't allowed to see them after last time I heard that you and him doubled up on Carol Vorderman after a guest appearance on count down. You don't have to confirm or deny this bear, just know that I was hurt not being invited, that's all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearsy Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 next time we're doing countdown i'll let you know. I'm doing Riley, bletch is having the milf in dictionary corner. You can have Jeff Stelling. Edit: scratch that, i don't think he's in it no more. How'd you feel bout the old grey from the Apprentice? Edit2: Why is the paps not getting no good info on Rachel Riley? Seems a bit of an oversight, IMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tokyo-Saint Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 Stelling? Should I join or not? It's a conundrum that's for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearsy Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 You should do tokyos. I hear he's filfth. When we're doing the countdown birds me and bletch like to have the countdown music playing in the background and we try and finish just as the da-da da-da da da da dum! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tokyo-Saint Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 You should do tokyos. I hear he's filfth. When we're doing the countdown birds me and bletch like to have the countdown music playing in the background and we try and finish just as the da-da da-da da da da dum! Seems like a long time to keep doing it for to me. How do you keep you keep going for so long? A quick glance at Stelling titz? That is well known for giving you an extra 5 secs but that's it. I admire your stamina. I bet bletchy talking about words and stuff helps you keep your mind of the job for a bit though? It is pretty difficult to be fair, especially as that music gets faster and faster and builds to the big ending. Whatever happened to 15-1? I always preferred that. Although I often wondered why the obviously intelligent people on there went on that program, battled some other intelligent people, answering difficult questions to just get a kind of frosted glass ornament at the end. Why didn't they go on like going for gold with Henry Kelly or something and clean up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintbletch Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 You should do tokyos. I hear he's filfth. When we're doing the countdown birds me and bletch like to have the countdown music playing in the background and we try and finish just as the da-da da-da da da da dum! And if I recall correctly you haven't once yet made it to the final 'dum' before your spumante moment. 30 seconds? How can you get from flaccid to sticky in 30 seconds bear? Anyway, Rachel Riley doesn't find your jokes funny - continually asking her if you can have 'one from the bottom'. It's not right. A couple of points of order. 1) nobody comes in my 'dictionary corner'. Ever. 2) Regarding 'norks' buctootim is right IF he was stating that he liked female mammalian chest appendages (presumably human), but if he was saying that he liked to see two (a pair of) unpopular, teenage computer users (geeks, dorks, nerds) then there is a silent G in 'gnorks'. Which was it buctootim? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tokyo-Saint Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 With all those long words bletch, you've really put yourself into a Honorificabilitudinitatibus position. Well done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonnyboy Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 Probably a big deal to her. F*ck off, she was wearing a see through top and a thong on a cat walk when she seduced William at uni. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scotty Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 I wonder whether Linley copped anything for letting the paparazzi roam around his property? He always struck me as well shifty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Window Cleaner Posted 14 September, 2012 Share Posted 14 September, 2012 it's what comes from royalty marrying commoners I guess, wouldn't catch a real princess with her norks out in the garden, well other than the late Princess Margaret that is, then again she had a taste for commoners as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now