saint_stevo Posted 16 November, 2008 Posted 16 November, 2008 http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/n/norwich/7730288.stm
VectisSaint Posted 16 November, 2008 Posted 16 November, 2008 http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/n/norwich/7730288.stm Unlike Saints, Norwich are probably more savvy than to loan out a plyer to a close rival.
Thorpe-le-Saint Posted 16 November, 2008 Posted 16 November, 2008 Don't think we really need a striker
southamptonfclegend Posted 16 November, 2008 Posted 16 November, 2008 at least it means he won't score against us
chivvy1664 Posted 16 November, 2008 Posted 16 November, 2008 Dont think he is the type of player that can play upfront on his own.
Plumstead_Saint Posted 16 November, 2008 Posted 16 November, 2008 Haven't we got enough loan players? Maybe some of them should actually play, or else return to their clubs first?
Amesbury Saint Posted 16 November, 2008 Posted 16 November, 2008 I dont want us to have any more loans. If we are building for the future, lets do it with our own players.
krissyboy31 Posted 16 November, 2008 Posted 16 November, 2008 I dont want us to have any more loans. If we are building for the future, lets do it with our own players. We've loaned them all out!!
fareham saint phil Posted 16 November, 2008 Posted 16 November, 2008 Cureton playing for us means the little **** wont score against us, where ever hes been he scores against us, bring the ****er here that should start him on a drout
Under Weststand Posted 16 November, 2008 Posted 16 November, 2008 Can he play at centre back or full back. That is were we need to strengthen first IMHO
saintjinksie Posted 16 November, 2008 Posted 16 November, 2008 Don't think we really need a striker no, mcgoldricks world class...
saint_stevo Posted 16 November, 2008 Author Posted 16 November, 2008 Don't think we really need a striker We dont score enough goals, and other than McGoldrick, our options up top are seriously limited (Pekhart sucks)
AndyNorthernSaints Posted 16 November, 2008 Posted 16 November, 2008 Proven goal scorer and too experienced for Saints.
team-saint Posted 16 November, 2008 Posted 16 November, 2008 could work well with McG upfront, and BWP off the bench after 70. just down to Rupert and Jan to make a decision - I think we can guess it will be no ...
Chez Posted 17 November, 2008 Posted 17 November, 2008 Cureton returns to his first club, now that would be nice. Not sure how he would fit in to our 1 up front formation though and to be honest McGoldrick is starting to play well there IMO.
slickmick Posted 17 November, 2008 Posted 17 November, 2008 No to Cureton, would much prefer Saganoski. I wish we had got Lita instead of Robertson and Pekart, with our style of football he would have been the ideal striker.
Chez Posted 17 November, 2008 Posted 17 November, 2008 No to Cureton, would much prefer Saganoski. I wish we had got Lita instead of Robertson and Pekart, with our style of football he would have been the ideal striker. Saga and Cureton are very similar indeed. Lita would have been excellent. At the Valley last season he scored the life out of me. Great pace , strength and a real threat. Sadly way out of our price range. Robertson and Pekart combined won't earn in a month what Lita is on in a week.
southamptonfclegend Posted 17 November, 2008 Posted 17 November, 2008 We dont score enough goals, and other than McGoldrick, our options up top are seriously limited (Pekhart sucks) McGoldrick is worse hes had the most shots in the league and got about 5? and one of them should have been lallana's
Chez Posted 18 November, 2008 Posted 18 November, 2008 McGoldrick is worse hes had the most shots in the league and got about 5? and one of them should have been lallana's he's got 7 and is playing well right now.
davefoggy Posted 18 November, 2008 Posted 18 November, 2008 anyone remember the good old days when we had our world famous "log jam of strikers...."
Chez Posted 18 November, 2008 Posted 18 November, 2008 why did we sign Saga and Stern John when we couldn't afford to pay Rasiak anyway?
Chez Posted 18 November, 2008 Posted 18 November, 2008 McGoldrick is worse hes had the most shots in the league and got about 5? and one of them should have been lallana's also that fact he getting shots in says someone is doing something right to create all these opportunities. Unless you hadn't noticed I like what I see with McGoldrick, or at least I haev over the last month. He has increased his workrate, is linking well with Lallana and Surman, and since he was moved back wghere he shoudl be (the middle) he has looked decent. Why JP plays him out wide or drops him deep is beyond me.
Chez Posted 18 November, 2008 Posted 18 November, 2008 how about we get rid of Smith, Pekhard and Robertson and try some new loans?
saint1977 Posted 18 November, 2008 Posted 18 November, 2008 Saga and Cureton are very similar indeed. Lita would have been excellent. At the Valley last season he scored the life out of me. Great pace , strength and a real threat. Sadly way out of our price range. Robertson and Pekart combined won't earn in a month what Lita is on in a week. Lita's wages are being paid by a local businessman in Norfolk who is a lifelong Norwich fan. Not that I'm lauding Leon Crouch in any way - he appointed Dodd and Gorman for a start - but Leon to the best of my knowledge is the only local businessman in the area that has backed the club signing a player or loan player? Pretty sad really when you look at the local backing that Hull and others (Stoke) have had as well without any overseas sugar daddies or borrowing through the roof. Another local businessman, Geoffrey Watling, stopped Norwich going kaput after their version of Guy Askham, Robert Chase, bled Norwich City from beating Bayern to within 24 hours of extinction in 4 years. I'd love to think that a Hampshire businessman or woman that has been a lifelong fan (no, not a LifeLong Saint..) will do the same next year but I doubt it.
saint1977 Posted 18 November, 2008 Posted 18 November, 2008 how about we get rid of Smith, Pekhard and Robertson and try some new loans? Totally agree, Smith is one of those players that couldn't even cut it at Millwall, Pekhart has done nowt since a good finish V Ipswich despite a seemingly excellent pedigree and ditto Robertson after his cracker V Norwich (although he has been injured for some of his loan to be fair). Not sure I'd opt for Cureton though, I think we need a bigger striker to give us a different option and to free space for McG and Lallana to run into.
SaintRichmond Posted 18 November, 2008 Posted 18 November, 2008 33 year old.... Too old for us!! Excellent !! ... he should blend in well with Lowe's Total Football Youth Policy .... and of course be a ready replacement for a Young Star sold off in Lowe's January Cull ............
Dicko Posted 18 November, 2008 Posted 18 November, 2008 Unlike Saints, Norwich are probably more savvy than to loan out a plyer to a close rival. You're right, most clubs with any brains won't loan a player to a rival Hold on a minute, remind me..........where's Rasiak again?????
SaintRichmond Posted 18 November, 2008 Posted 18 November, 2008 Haven't we got enough loan players? Maybe some of them should actually play, or else return to their clubs first? The next phase of Lowe's Master Plan now becomes clear ........ .... as from February 1st, our name changes to LOAN RANGERS:)
jam Posted 18 November, 2008 Posted 18 November, 2008 You're right, most clubs with any brains won't loan a player to a rival Hold on a minute, remind me..........where's Rasiak again????? Dare I say.. "whooosh"?
Chez Posted 18 November, 2008 Posted 18 November, 2008 You're right, most clubs with any brains won't loan a player to a rival Hold on a minute, remind me..........where's Rasiak again????? the simple question is will we go bust if he came back?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now