The9 Posted 17 August, 2012 Share Posted 17 August, 2012 3 may be free because Fox might like his number 13 form last season. Adkins stated he was happy with Fox and Shaw as left backs in the press conference. Plus Clyne can also play on the left if needed. 3 is free because we're signing a left back, just like 15 is free because we're signing a centre back and 10 is free because we're signing Ramirez. Big drops for Richardson, Chaplow and Guly, Butterfield may be glad he's even got a number, as Barnard, Dickson and Reeves don't have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The9 Posted 17 August, 2012 Share Posted 17 August, 2012 New CB could be 3. 15 is free, which meets our numbering system nicely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Le God Posted 17 August, 2012 Share Posted 17 August, 2012 Jason Puncheon is clearly a big Douglas Adams fan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The9 Posted 17 August, 2012 Share Posted 17 August, 2012 just gor the record, lee was confirmed as 19 when the home kit came out Nobody was confirmed as anything when the kit came out, but the shop sold a few shirts pre-printed "at your own risk" for Lambert, Lallana, and Lee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThreeSixty Posted 17 August, 2012 Share Posted 17 August, 2012 Glad i didn't already get my Guly shirt printed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teacher Posted 17 August, 2012 Share Posted 17 August, 2012 17 also missing! Guly moving to 21 might be because of new signing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The9 Posted 17 August, 2012 Share Posted 17 August, 2012 (edited) I realise no-one gives a toss, but here's my guesswork from the end of June, just goes to prove how much can change... we've signed Clyne, Steven Davis, Ward-Prowse has impressed, Forte has gone on loan, Seaborne has come back better than anticipated, Barnard and Dickson are out of the squad altogether and Hooiveld has got #5 despite preferring 26 on twitter. 1 Davis 2 Richardson Clyne in 3 Fox Fox has kept #13 4 Schneiderlin 5 ? is now Hooiveld 6 Fonte 7 Lambert 8 Cork Davis in 9 Rodriguez 10 Sharp kept for Ramirez 11 Guly Sharp keeps #11 - as requested on twitter 12 Butterfield taken by Gazzaniga in a twist on our numbering system 13 Shaw bumped down for Fox and empty #3 14 Hammond 15 ? still free 16 ? Ward-Prowse 17 De Ridder free as Forte is on loan 18 ? Cork as bumped by Davis 19 Lee 20 Lallana 21 ? Guly as bumped by Ramirez/Sharp 22 J Stephens turns out he's a CB now so has 26 23 Harding sold, Shaw has number as 3rd choice LB 24 ? Dunno how I knew this would stay vacant 25 ? Seaborne recovery better than imagined 26 Hooiveld now Stephens 27 Chambers has 28, so close. 28 Chaplow has 27, dammit 29 Barnard no squad number even though 29 is free... 30 Ward-Prowse has done better than expected and is 16 31 ? free 32 ? is Butterfield as Gazzaniga has changed the "use" of 12 33 Dickson gone, De Ridder has kept the number 35 Seaborne has 25 due to decent recovery 37 Forte loaned out 41 Forecast loaned out 42 Puncheon Despite having the basics of position and number spot on, nearly all of them are wrong due to the new signings and a couple of better ratings of kids. Unlucky with Chambers and Chaplow though ! Edited 17 August, 2012 by The9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The9 Posted 17 August, 2012 Share Posted 17 August, 2012 (edited) The new numbering system (or v1.11 if you like) 1, 12, (31) GKs 2, 22, 32 RBs (3), 13, 23 LBs 4, 8, 10, 14, 16, 18, 20, 27, 28, 29, (30), 33, 42 MIDs 5, 6, (15), 16, 25, 26 CBs 7, 9, 11, (17), 19, 21, 24 LW/RW/STs Plus 34-40 and 43 upwards which could be pretty much anyone youth/late. (35, 36 both dev strikers) Old numbering system: (v1.0) 1, 21, 31 GKs 2, 12, (22) RBs 3, 13, 23 LBs 4, 8, 10, 14, 18, 20 MIDs 5, 6, 15, 16, 25, 26 CBs 7, 9, 11, 17, 19 LW/RW/STs 27, 28, 29, 30, 32 upwards : Youth/late signings Edited 30 August, 2012 by The9 Added 29, 35, 36 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The9 Posted 17 August, 2012 Share Posted 17 August, 2012 17 also missing! Guly moving to 21 might be because of new signing? "Might be?" as long as we sign him that's what he's getting, it's already been reported. 17 is missing because we just loaned Forte out, though he wasn't getting a number anyway. Reeves, Dickson and Barnard also don't have numbers. I don't think "you're not wanted any more" is said better than by not giving players numbers when there are plenty relating to their position free. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The9 Posted 17 August, 2012 Share Posted 17 August, 2012 I'm also wondering if Cork got bumped due to being with Team GB when they had the conversation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpine_saint Posted 30 August, 2012 Share Posted 30 August, 2012 Reckon 3 for Yoshida, 10 being kept for Ramirez, 15 first available number for Mayuka ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S-Clarke Posted 30 August, 2012 Share Posted 30 August, 2012 Reckon 3 for Yoshida, 10 being kept for Ramirez, 15 first available number for Mayuka ? I think he's got 17, may be wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Appy Posted 30 August, 2012 Share Posted 30 August, 2012 Thought Mayuka was 24? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Garrett Posted 30 August, 2012 Share Posted 30 August, 2012 Think Mayuka was 24 at his old club. Guess we'll find out when they'll all properly announced. i.e pic with shirt/video on saintsplayer etc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The9 Posted 30 August, 2012 Share Posted 30 August, 2012 Think Mayuka was 24 at his old club. Guess we'll find out when they'll all properly announced. i.e pic with shirt/video on saintsplayer etc Mayuka has been given 24, it's on the OS in his "signed" article. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Garrett Posted 30 August, 2012 Share Posted 30 August, 2012 Ah....fair doos. I cannot be bothered with the OS it's so bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The9 Posted 30 August, 2012 Share Posted 30 August, 2012 (edited) Also, from Tuesday : 29 Reeves 34 Moore 35 Hoskins 36 Sinclair None of those were announced in the initial squad list. Amusingly, the OS report of the Stevenage match "report" button here : http://www.saintsfc.co.uk/fixtures-results/match-report/ correctly notes that Hoskins came on for Sharp, whilst the Press Association release claims it was "Cobey" Moore (34 not the person with "HOSKINS 35" on his shirt, and not called Cobey) This is also repeated on the OS on the "lineup" button - the one right next to the "report". So it's inconsistent on the OS across two tabs next to each other... Edited 30 August, 2012 by The9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The9 Posted 30 August, 2012 Share Posted 30 August, 2012 Ah....fair doos. I cannot be bothered with the OS it's so bad. http://www.saintsfc.co.uk/news/article/saints-make-mayuka-move-339701.aspx Wait for it to load, click at the bottom to read the last paragraph of the article, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krissyboy31 Posted 31 August, 2012 Share Posted 31 August, 2012 So how does this look now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sidney Fudpucker the 3rd Posted 31 August, 2012 Share Posted 31 August, 2012 10. Ramirez. That's all that matters as we're a one man team. ;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Charlie Posted 31 August, 2012 Share Posted 31 August, 2012 Yoshida probably 3 which now means 11, 14, 15, 17 are free Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krissyboy31 Posted 31 August, 2012 Share Posted 31 August, 2012 Cropper will get a number as #3 keeper, probably 31 going on the above format. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The9 Posted 1 September, 2012 Share Posted 1 September, 2012 Yoshida probably 3 which now means 11, 14, 15, 17 are free Would be surprised if Yoshida wasn't 15, though we are being a little less analysis with the numbering this season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now