Jump to content

Gaston Ramirez - Signs 4 Year Deal


Clunge

Ramirez, will he sign Y/N  

572 members have voted

  1. 1. Ramirez, will he sign Y/N



Recommended Posts

I am confused over the whole guarantee business. If the Bank Bologna are getting their loan from require us to supply a guarantee for the final instalments of this deal, would that make us liable for that loan if Bologna 'do a pompey'? I would imagine if that is the case then there is absolutely no way NC will agree, and nor should he.

 

I asked this yesterday morning (probably about 20 pages ago) and didnt get a response.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by merrimd

I am confused over the whole guarantee business. If the Bank Bologna are getting their loan from require us to supply a guarantee for the final instalments of this deal, would that make us liable for that loan if Bologna 'do a pompey'? I would imagine if that is the case then there is absolutely no way NC will agree, and nor should he.

 

I asked this yesterday morning (probably about 20 pages ago) and didnt get a response.

 

I don't think so. If you took out a loan based on your earnings and then defaulted, you wouldn't expect your boss to be liable for it would you? Effectively, we are just guaranteeing their earnings, not the loan itself. If Bologna have money problems, they'll need to let Ramirez go before the end of the window. I think they are just hanging on to see if anyone else wil come in for him and if they can get an auction going. All the other talk is just a delaying tactic. As Friday gets closer, they may even come back to us and push for the deal to be done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by merrimd

I am confused over the whole guarantee business. If the Bank Bologna are getting their loan from require us to supply a guarantee for the final instalments of this deal, would that make us liable for that loan if Bologna 'do a pompey'? I would imagine if that is the case then there is absolutely no way NC will agree, and nor should he.

 

 

 

I don't think so. If you took out a loan based on your earnings and then defaulted, you wouldn't expect your boss to be liable for it would you? Effectively, we are just guaranteeing their earnings, not the loan itself. If Bologna have money problems, they'll need to let Ramirez go before the end of the window. I think they are just hanging on to see if anyone else wil come in for him and if they can get an auction going. All the other talk is just a delaying tactic. As Friday gets closer, they may even come back to us and push for the deal to be done.

 

 

It depends if we are being asked to provide proof of income (that we will pay the installments - which in it self will be the contract betweent he clubs) or act as guarantor. If it's the latter then we will be liable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apologies, poor choice of words. We can't give the guarantees that are required. The bottom line is that if we can't /wont pay in full then bologna need a loan. Our "proof" of ability to pay is seemingly not good enough as it doesn't prove that we will pay and does not give security.

 

 

None of this is our problem. Bologna are clearly skint - this puts us in a strong position. The absolute last thing we need to do is give them all the money. We're playing it right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

None of this is our problem. Bologna are clearly skint - this puts us in a strong position. The absolute last thing we need to do is give them all the money. We're playing it right.

 

...Is exactly right. People who say that all you do is slate the club completely ignore posts like these.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

None of this is our problem. Bologna are clearly skint - this puts us in a strong position. The absolute last thing we need to do is give them all the money. We're playing it right.

 

Is it though? It is our problem if they won't deal unless we put cash on the table. Save for the obvious impact on cashflow, what is wrong with paying the full fee? If we haven't got the cash that's our problem. If we had it that puts us in the strongest possible position.

 

I find the whole concept of the selling club needing to take out a loan to sell an asset more than a little strange.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...Is exactly right. People who say that all you do is slate the club completely ignore posts like these.

 

You've changed your tune......earlier in this thread you were saying there is nothing to negotiate as we just need to pay Bologna what they want.

 

But I guess CB Fry hadn't offered his opinion at the time so you couldn't have possbily know what to think all by yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You've changed your tune......earlier in this thread you were saying there is nothing to negotiate as we just need to pay Bologna what they want.

 

But I guess CB Fry hadn't offered his opinion at the time so you couldn't have possbily know what to think all by yourself.

 

Please post where I said we should pay all the money up front? I said either we agree with the valuation and pay it or we don't. That is still the case, it's simply a case of when this money is paid that is the sticking point. Paying all of it upfront would be silly.

Edited by hypochondriac
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You've changed your tune......earlier in this thread you were saying there is nothing to negotiate as we just need to pay Bologna what they want.

 

But I guess CB Fry hadn't offered his opinion at the time so you couldn't have possbily know what to think all by yourself.

 

Bless ya Dig Dig. Hypo doesn't have a strong opinion that isn't designed to wind someone else up ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please post where I said we should pay all the money up front? I said either we agree with the valuation and pay it or we don't. That is still the case, it's simply a case of when this money is paid that is the sticking point. Paying all of it upfront would be silly.

 

Why silly to pay all upfront, especially if that secures the deal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only time you ever started replying to any of my posts were when I objected to you using violence against your children.

 

Yeah alright, mate. So erm what about last year's meltdown because someone closed the big HCDAJFU thread? Or all the times we've agreed on the euro? Or when you've been chastised for bullying teenagers.

 

That last point alone puts your moral high ground on spanking well underground.

 

Still, gotta have something to do in your bedsit, eh mush? x

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why silly to pay all upfront, especially if that secures the deal?

 

because....there is a budget for transfers - even if Cortese is controlling it - and we still have to buy " one or two CB's - Nigel Adkins' comment " . They won't necessarily come FREE, plus we have to pay salaries to them after they've signed. A player getting £20K /week (not a large wage in the Prem.) will earn £1 million a year ..if 40K /week = £2 million. etc....

 

If the reported fee for Ramirez is £12 million, and the reported salary - did I hear 80K /week?...then by the end of a 4 year contract ......he will have cost Saints, around £28 million !....and he's only ONE player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

because....there is a budget for transfers - even if Cortese is controlling it - and we still have to buy " one or two CB's - Nigel Adkins' comment " . They won't necessarily come FREE, plus we have to pay salaries to them after they've signed. A player getting £20K /week (not a large wage in the Prem.) will earn £1 million a year ..if 40K /week = £2 million. etc....

 

If the reported fee for Ramirez is £12 million, and the reported salary - did I hear 80K /week?...then by the end of a 4 year contract ......he will have cost Saints, around £28 million !....and he's only ONE player.

 

This

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I appreciate the cash flow point but none of us know what our income or budget is. My point, simply, is this seems to be a put up or shut up deal. If we want the player and cashflow/budget allows us to then we get the job done. The statement from others that it would be silly to pay the full fee (as a matter of principle) is silly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

€80k/week......LOL!!!!!!! No. It worked out about €38k net, so if all liabilities are the same as everyone else (which im sure they're not given the fact there are ways of getting around tax issues) he'd be on less than €60k.

Probably right but the point is still valid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

tancredipalmeri: Gaston Ramirez threatens Bologna not to train anymore if they won't release him to Southampton. Deal in stand-by, Tottenham might get in

 

Spurs have left this too late, in fact any club have left it too late really. They've got a lot of catching up to do in around a week, and they'll have to offer him more than we have - which going by their first offer, they weren't able to do.

 

It's all boiling down to a final day switch. Bolonga are playing this to their advantage, but the gamble could leave them skint with an unhappy player who doesn't want to play for them (And then his value will most likely drop).

 

No brainer. Wake up bolonga.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We'll get him. Spurs don't even want him.

 

Plus he does not want Spurs. One of the reasons he stated he wanted to come to us was that we have basically promised him he would play every week and we will build a team around him. He would not get that at Spuds even if they offered the same wages.

 

I am beginning to believe he will come to us, but it will be the end of next week before he signs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Plus he does not want Spurs. One of the reasons he stated he wanted to come to us was that we have basically promised him he would play every week and we will build a team around him. He would not get that at Spuds even if they offered the same wages.

 

I am beginning to believe he will come to us, but it will be the end of next week before he signs.

 

I think he said that before he was linked with us as well. He didn't want to be ''another'' player, he wants to be a ''leader'' in the team.

 

Although if Spurs sell RdV then there is a first team opening for him, but time is running out for them. We've already done the hard work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I appreciate the cash flow point but none of us know what our income or budget is. My point, simply, is this seems to be a put up or shut up deal. If we want the player and cashflow/budget allows us to then we get the job done. The statement from others that it would be silly to pay the full fee (as a matter of principle) is silly.

 

 

 

We have remained "shut up" throughout.

 

Paying a skint club all the money up front is bonkers. No club would do it, except maybe QPR who are equally mental.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, it can't run for much longer. There's only a week left for this to run.

 

Lots and lots will happen next week IMO. Quite exciting I guess, I always like deadline business.

 

Yeah but what I mean is it won't be finishing today most likely. Will probably happen end of next week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...