Jump to content

Please vote in the Lowe Out Poll

Mole

By Mole
in The Saints

 Share

Recommended Posts

Mole

Mole

Posted
  • Author
Posted
I vote Stanley OUT

 

I dare say it won't be long before i'm banned. DSM has already sent me a threatening warning for posting something he disagreed with.:rolleyes:

Roman

Roman

Posted
Posted
I did vote, but really it's just proving the blindingly obvious.

 

Might be more interesting to have a poll on here to figure out the exact proportions of pro to anti Lowes, and shades in between.

Mole

Mole

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Might be more interesting to have a poll on here to figure out the exact proportions of pro to anti Lowes, and shades in between.

 

Polls on here are worthless as only the elite £5 posters can vote so the potential sample is too small.

Roman

Roman

Posted
Posted
Polls on here are worthless as only the elite £5 posters can vote so the potential sample is too small.

 

Really? I thought only full members could start them. Sure you're right though. What a funny 'privilege' to remove.

NickG

NickG

Posted
Posted

its like the Burley out votes -which got some reasonable support, but if the vote were more accurately Burley out to be replaced by Dodd -think it would have been very different!

 

So your vote is only half of a question

Roman

Roman

Posted
Posted
its like the Burley out votes -which got some reasonable support, but if the vote were more accurately Burley out to be replaced by Dodd -think it would have been very different!

 

So your vote is only half of a question

 

Well, hence the 'shades in between', if it was designed cleverly enough. But if it's full members only, it would be pretty pointless.

NickG

NickG

Posted
Posted

for example, personally if it was just for Lowe to walk with no obvious replacement beforehand leaving Crouch and Wilde to argue again -I would say stay and keep the continuity..

If it was for a uniting respected figure head with backing of all shareholders (or buying out) e.g Salz I think it could be a good thing.

Very simplistic I know but not as bad as Lowe out and place an add in job centre!

Mole

Mole

Posted
  • Author
Posted
I am sure when Rupert sees the results of the vote on your website he will fall on his sword.

 

You would think so. Afterall Lowe stood for the Referendum Party. It's funny how ones principles can change to suit though isn't it?

NickG

NickG

Posted
Posted
You would think so. Afterall Lowe stood for the Referendum Party. It's funny how ones principles can change to suit though isn't it?

 

currently at 47 to go, 12 to stay!

 

he will find that hard to argue with;)

Nexstar

Nexstar

Posted
Posted

Now down to 77%, and i've become the 14th person to say no.

 

I think Lowe may now be shocked at the vast number of fans that want him out that he'll just leave forever.

Bald Headed Jesus

Bald Headed Jesus

Posted
Posted
You would think so. Afterall Lowe stood for the Referendum Party. It's funny how ones principles can change to suit though isn't it?

 

Yes, a couple of hundred votes on a website hardly anyone has heard of will make all the difference.

 

I am no great fan of Lowe but there is no alternative at the moment. IF we were voting to get someone else specific in that would make more sense.

Nexstar

Nexstar

Posted
Posted
Yes, a couple of hundred votes on a website hardly anyone has heard of will make all the difference.

 

I am no great fan of Lowe but there is no alternative at the moment. IF we were voting to get someone else specific in that would make more sense.

 

This.

 

The exact thing that this club does not need right now is unrest.

Delmary

Delmary

Posted
Posted
Yes, a couple of hundred votes on a website hardly anyone has heard of will make all the difference.

 

I am no great fan of Lowe but there is no alternative at the moment. IF we were voting to get someone else specific in that would make more sense.

There are loads of options. There are plenty of good people out there who could run this club equally or better than Rupert Lowe. By the way he only works 2 days a week at SFC.
Mole

Mole

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Now down to 77%, and i've become the 14th person to say no.

 

I think Lowe may now be shocked at the vast number of fans that want him out that he'll just leave forever.

 

Call me Peter Snow, but the trend is consistent with Polls run a few years ago on S4E. The last Poll conducted on there (with a far higher sample than my poll is likely to get) resulted in 79% wanting Lowe out.

Mole

Mole

Posted
  • Author
Posted
And no murmured protestations of "I'm not a racist" ?

 

Sounds like you're proud of it!

 

And you are a football hooligan. Are you proud of it?

Mole

Mole

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Is that a threat Nazi boy?

 

No, but i see you at most Northern away games so i can buy you a beer and we can chat about it. I'm sure that away from the innernet we'd get on.

EastleighSoulBoy

EastleighSoulBoy

Posted
Posted
And you are a football hooligan. Are you proud of it?

 

That is the second time that you have made that assertion. Using the present tense as well.

 

So please bring on the proof that I currently indulge in Football hooliganism, or have done since back in the early to mid mid 70's.

 

As to proud of it? Not really, it's an era in my past which I have no pride in. Unlike your continuing pride in still being racist.

Mole

Mole

Posted
  • Author
Posted
That is the second time that you have made that assertion. Using the present tense as well.

 

So please bring on the proof that I currently indulge in Football hooliganism, or have done since back in the early to mid mid 70's.

 

As to proud of it? Not really, it's an era in my past which I have no pride in. Unlike your continuing pride in still being racist.

 

And i'll make the assertion again. You seem to think you can throw **** at me and not get it thrown back.

EastleighSoulBoy

EastleighSoulBoy

Posted
Posted
And i'll make the assertion again. You seem to think you can throw **** at me and not get it thrown back.

 

I have stated that I have not been involved in any hooligan activities since the early to mis 70's. Unlike your admission, in a PM to me, that you are a 'bit' racist!

Mole

Mole

Posted
  • Author
Posted
I have stated that I have not been involved in any hooligan activities since the early to mis 70's. Unlike your admission, in a PM to me, that you are a 'bit' racist!

 

I agree with Enoch Powell, but i don't agree with genocide etc, but i don't want to respond to you further on here.

Mole

Mole

Posted
  • Author
Posted
That's no problem, you're well and truly out in the open now anyway.

 

Goodbye.

 

So what. I've told one of the mods you are trying to bait me and i'll just ignore you in future - if they ban me based on your work then so be it even though i can't see any grounds for such action. You posted up "part" of a PM that i sent you to try and sort out this tit for tat ******** out. Cheers for that Eastleigh.

EastleighSoulBoy

EastleighSoulBoy

Posted
Posted
So what. I've told one of the mods you are trying to bait me and i'll just ignore you in future - if they ban me based on your work then so be it even though i can't see any grounds for such action. You posted up "part" of a PM that i sent you to try and sort out this tit for tat ******** out. Cheers for that Eastleigh.

 

They already have all the content of our PMs, take a look next time you PM someone. There's a BCC function which means Blind Carbon Copy.

 

Bait you? You swallowed you own hook mate, with little encouragement from me. All my questions were polite and logical as the BCC shows.

Mole

Mole

Posted
  • Author
Posted
They already have all the content of our PMs, take a look next time you PM someone. There's a BCC function which means Blind Carbon Copy.

 

Bait you? You swallowed you own hook mate, with little encouragement from me. All my questions were polite and logical as the BCC shows.

 

These PM's:

 

 

Originally Posted by Stanley

Sorry i can't comment on the subject on here.

 

Originally Posted by EastleighSoulBoy

It surprised me that you did not defend your position which can only lead, maybe wrongly, to one assumption?

 

I would have thought that you would be able to say that you are not a racist, if you aren't, despite what may be going on behind the scenes?

 

Originally Posted by Stanley

It's irrelevent if i am a bit racist or not, so long as i don't break the rules on here surely i'm allowed freedom of thought?

 

Originally Posted by EastleighSoulBoy

Everyone is entitled to their thoughts. Expressing them thoughts in the open can leave you liable to being labelled racist and can be viewed as an inflammatory action.

 

Their is no such thing, by the way, as being a 'bit' racist! In this society it also has a relevance.

 

Of special relevance to you is the fact that you may well lose your membership of the forum.

 

Originally Posted by Stanley

Exactly and don't want to get banned, but take me agreeing with Enoch Powell, that's not racist. It's common sense.

 

You started all this tit for tat ****.

 

Originally Posted by EastleighSoulBoy

You really need to get a grip on things young man. I asked you politely why you had not defended yourself, it's patently clear now why you didn't.

 

You are biting on your own baited hook!

 

Please note that first contact by PM was initiated by you.

 

Originally Posted by Stanley

And i was wrong to trust you.

 

Originally Posted by EastleighSoulBoy

It may be prudent to learn to trust yourself before you try to trust others when you don't know or understand their outlook on life.

 

Originally Posted by EastleighSoulBoy

Yeah i'll learn from this, but you've really let yourself down.

Mr saint

Mr saint

Posted
Posted
These PM's:

 

 

Originally Posted by Stanley

Sorry i can't comment on the subject on here.

 

Originally Posted by EastleighSoulBoy

It surprised me that you did not defend your position which can only lead, maybe wrongly, to one assumption?

 

I would have thought that you would be able to say that you are not a racist, if you aren't, despite what may be going on behind the scenes?

 

Originally Posted by Stanley

It's irrelevent if i am a bit racist or not, so long as i don't break the rules on here surely i'm allowed freedom of thought?

 

Originally Posted by EastleighSoulBoy

Everyone is entitled to their thoughts. Expressing them thoughts in the open can leave you liable to being labelled racist and can be viewed as an inflammatory action.

 

Their is no such thing, by the way, as being a 'bit' racist! In this society it also has a relevance.

 

Of special relevance to you is the fact that you may well lose your membership of the forum.

 

Originally Posted by Stanley

Exactly and don't want to get banned, but take me agreeing with Enoch Powell, that's not racist. It's common sense.

 

You started all this tit for tat ****.

 

Originally Posted by EastleighSoulBoy

You really need to get a grip on things young man. I asked you politely why you had not defended yourself, it's patently clear now why you didn't.

 

You are biting on your own baited hook!

 

Please note that first contact by PM was initiated by you.

 

Originally Posted by Stanley

And i was wrong to trust you.

 

Originally Posted by EastleighSoulBoy

It may be prudent to learn to trust yourself before you try to trust others when you don't know or understand their outlook on life.

 

Originally Posted by EastleighSoulBoy

Yeah i'll learn from this, but you've really let yourself down.

 

Jeeeez, get a room you 2!

Mole

Mole

Posted
  • Author
Posted
i,ve got more respect and i expect most of this forum for eastleigh then the likes of you.

 

Hardly suprising, you can't can't stand me and i can't stand you. The majority may well have far more respect for Eastleigh, i can live with that as i'm not looking for approval.

 

That said this little episode where i said, in a PRIVATE MESSAGE - "It's irrelevent if i am a bit racist or not" that i've done nothing wrong at all.

 

The only one who comes out of this looking bad, imho (maybe not in the majorities) is Eastleigh for being a devious grass.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...