Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Thing is, we've not really been in this posistion before have we?

 

I can't wait to see what we can play like when there really is little pressure, just a game plan.

Posted
This idea that Adkins will chuck in a load of young players and see how we get on... not a snowball's chance in hell.

 

You will see a team that understand's Citeh's strengths and plays to ours. Unless you believe that after two seasons of near-perfect tactical analysis, he is now reverting to Burley player scrabble, picking them out of the green bag at random...

 

 

the answer lies in the squad numbers really. Typical first team today I think.

 

 

1,2,13,5,6,4,8,20,7,9,42 or whatever number Guly is now.

Posted
the answer lies in the squad numbers really. Typical first team today I think.

 

 

1,2,13,5,6,4,8,20,7,9,42 or whatever number Guly is now.

 

Two key questions in our squad numbers unless I'm being really thick...

 

Who will be our new numbers 3 and 10? New left/right back and new winger/frontman?

Posted
Two key questions in our squad numbers unless I'm being really thick...

 

Who will be our new numbers 3 and 10? New left/right back and new winger/frontman?

 

Well Gaston came out and said we've given him the number 10 shirt, so him..!

 

I think we're after 2 players that will be real starters, top quality, and 2 players that can add cover.

Posted
I don't think anyone is suggesting that' date=' well I'm certainly not. I took it as presumed that any player that Adkins 'threw in' would be done so because he believed they fit best into the system we need to play against City.[/quote']

 

On that we agree. But people have talked about risk taking. I just don't see Adkins taking risks. He's not that sort of guy. The two words I would use for him are measured and positive.

Posted
Well Gaston came out and said we've given him the number 10 shirt, so him..!

 

I think we're after 2 players that will be real starters, top quality, and 2 players that can add cover.

 

Ah, ok! Didn't see that. So a new number 3 then...

Posted
Two key questions in our squad numbers unless I'm being really thick...

 

Who will be our new numbers 3 and 10? New left/right back and new winger/frontman?

 

 

Buttner and Ramirez if you believe all the rumours. You have to allow for personal choices though in the case of Lallana,Puncheon and Fox. 10 is number to which all continental attacking midfielders aspire, in our actual case it should be Lallana but as he's got a fixation on 20 it will go to Ramirez if he signs.

Posted (edited)

My personal selection today....

 

Davis

 

Clyne Fonte Jos Fox

Morgan

 

Punch Davis Lallana

 

Rikeeee Jay Rod

 

Subs.. Gazza, Seaborne, Shaw or Chappers/De Ridder(fitness ?) Sharpe, JWP and Guly.

 

 

We might see...Shaw LM and SD at RM..with Punch on bench...with Adam in middle of Shaw and Davis...

Edited by ottery st mary
Posted
My personal selection today....

 

Davis

 

Clyne Fonte Jos Fox

Morgan

 

Punch Davis Lallana

 

Rikeeee Jay Rod

 

Subs.. Gazza, Seaborne, Shaw or Chappers/De Ridder(fitness ?) Sharpe, JWP and Guly.

 

 

We might see...Shaw LM and SD at RM..with Punch on bench...with Adam in middle of Shaw and Davis...

 

We're more likely to play the formation we have been using in the friendlies...

 

4-5-1.gif

 

Lallana and Davis in central midfield, Schneiderlin as the holding midfielder with Rodriguez on the left and Guly or Puncheon on the right.

Posted
We're more likely to play the formation we have been using in the friendlies...

 

4-5-1.gif

 

Lallana and Davis in central midfield, Schneiderlin as the holding midfielder with Rodriguez on the left and Guly or Puncheon on the right.

 

OK Coach......;)

 

I am stuck in the past with 442 and 443....maybe even 351...:D

Posted
My personal selection today....

 

Davis

 

Clyne Fonte Jos Fox

Morgan

 

Punch Davis Lallana

 

Rikeeee Jay Rod

 

Subs.. Gazza, Seaborne, Shaw or Chappers/De Ridder(fitness ?) Sharpe, JWP and Guly.

 

 

We might see...Shaw LM and SD at RM..with Punch on bench...with Adam in middle of Shaw and Davis...

 

No Lee?

Posted
OK Coach......;)

 

I am stuck in the past with 442 and 443....maybe even 351...:D

 

Think you could be onto something there Ottery.

 

That innovative 4=4=3 should keep the scoreline down to single figures

Posted
No Lee?

 

Let him go to Bournemouth for match fitness...:p

 

Was not sure about our Tadanari......match fit?

 

Could well be in the mix:)

 

To be honest he is one of my favourites and a big surprise packet for the rest of the Premier..:)

 

Be more than happy if in side or squad...:D

Posted
Think you could be onto something there Ottery.

 

That innovative 4=4=3 should keep the scoreline down to single figures

 

Only a top coach like you Phil;) noticed that...

 

MLG ..You are sacked:blush:

Posted
Just praying it is a respectable scoreline

 

Well, I'm not prostrating myself before a deity, but we feel the same things.

 

I am bricking it, just want the match over but at the same time, am amazingly excited. The return to the Premiership has been a long time coming and shocking big teams in games like these has always been a highlight of being a Saints fan.

 

That all said, yep, let's keep it respectable.

Posted

I think we'll see JWP running himself into the ground first half and Davis coming in to tighten things up in second half and hold on to that 1-0 lead :)

Posted
I think we'll see JWP running himself into the ground first half and Davis coming in to tighten things up in second half and hold on to that 1-0 lead :)

 

I'll take a pint of whatever you're on, as soon as I hit the pub in 45 mins

Posted
My personal selection today....

 

Davis

 

Clyne Fonte Jos Fox

Morgan

 

Punch Davis Lallana

 

Rikeeee Jay Rod

 

Subs.. Gazza, Seaborne, Shaw or Chappers/De Ridder(fitness ?) Sharpe, JWP and Guly.

 

 

We might see...Shaw LM and SD at RM..with Punch on bench...with Adam in middle of Shaw and Davis...

 

What the absolute ****?

 

-----------------Davis

Clyne-----Fonte-----Hooiveld-----Fox

---------Morgan-----Davis

----------------Lallana

Puncheon------------------Rodriguez

---------------Lambert

 

Basically what we've been practising. City's fullbacks aren't world beaters, and if we do get anything, chances are it will come from us getting in the gaps between centre back and full back. City's middle is formidable and we're unlikely to get any change out of Toure, De Jong, Kompany etc. If it doesn't work, it's nonetheless practice playing like that, which we'll need to do a lot this season.

Posted
Good that Maloney just limped off for Wigan...thigh injury.

 

Yeah. Turned out to be one of their key players at end of last season. Hopefully puts him out of next week!

Posted

Right, as far as I was told, unless anything has changed since 10am this morning, Lambert is on the bench and Jay is the lone striker. I dont know who is on the wings but we have gone for pace so could be anyone from Puncheon, Guly, De Ridder, Lee etc.

 

If its wrong then i apologise but in a way I hope I'm wrong!

Posted
Could be AL left and JWP in midfield with Davis and Morgan. Punch right.

 

Possibly although I see Lallana as a key CM for us. He needs to break from the 3 and push up and support the striker at every opportunity. I'm expecting Puncheon on the right and Guly on the left. That's how I'd personally play it. Guly gets stick but he does get back and support the defence.

Posted

Can't help but feel disappointed for Lambert if it's true he isn't starting. Horses for courses and all that, but this guy deserves to start in our first game back.

Posted
Can't help but feel disappointed for Lambert if it's true he isn't starting. Horses for courses and all that, but this guy deserves to start in our first game back.

 

See the point but the aim is to get the best result possible and I can kind of see NA thinking if he is left out. He isn't mobile and we won't have a lot of the ball.

Posted
Can't help but feel disappointed for Lambert if it's true he isn't starting. Horses for courses and all that, but this guy deserves to start in our first game back.

 

There is no room for sentiment in this league. You play the best available for the job at any given time

Posted
Right, as far as I was told, unless anything has changed since 10am this morning, Lambert is on the bench and Jay is the lone striker. I dont know who is on the wings but we have gone for pace so could be anyone from Puncheon, Guly, De Ridder, Lee etc.

 

If its wrong then i apologise but in a way I hope I'm wrong!

 

wont be him then ;)

Posted
There is no room for sentiment in this league. You play the best available for the job at any given time

 

Is that right? Guess works same way for Adkins if cortese gets rid of him.

Posted

I think the aim is for Jay to chase down everything and use his bit of pace in behind when we have the chance. It's a great option to have Lambert come off the bench though at some point if we need to start being more direct!

Posted
There is no room for sentiment in this league. You play the best available for the job at any given time

 

I would say presently, Lambert is better than J-Rod... but can see the thinking behind the decision if true.

Posted
Very pleased that jay is going to be used as the main striker. That's his position.

 

agree but I would still play Lambert in the hole and push Lallana out wide

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...