Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Did they?

 

They believe they did. Ignoring the fact that Manchester United had as many guys in the England squad that year as they did.

Posted
It's not been. Modern citizens retelling the genesis of this nation is not distorting it, regardless of whether their relatives may have been here at the time, its the nation they now call home and they are celebrating it.

 

It's PC b/llocks that is what it is.

Posted
It's PC b/llocks that is what it is.

 

So, to clarify. Are you saying that Black britains cannot publicly celebrate their nationality and the history involved?

Posted
No, the history still exists, it just hasn't been used to cause offence. Trivialising oppresion is a far bigger sin then discretion.

 

No, it's been distorted so it's not technicaly 'true'.

Posted (edited)
No, it's been distorted so it's not technicaly 'true'.

 

No it hasn't. Please, again, for the sake of clarity, explain why people of different ethnicity to the indigenous populace who have become naturalised residents and part of our society celebrating the nation's history has distorted it....

 

I wasn't aware that someone of Caribbean/African extraction from a (possibly...) third generation Afro-British family doing a dance interpretation of the Industrial revolution, a key event in his nation's history, has distorted it...

Edited by Colinjb
Posted
Danny Boyle is a ****in genius, I'm proud to be British

 

Your idea of genius is far removed from mine.....each to their own though eh!.

Posted
It has been absolutely fantastic. Brilliant. Better than the Beijing ceremony.

 

Did you enjoy the ceebeebies olympic challenge?

Posted
So, to clarify. Are you saying that Black britains cannot publicly celebrate their nationality and the history involved?

 

Of course they can, but what i'm saying is that the representation of 19th century Britain was farcical.

Posted
Of course they can, but what i'm saying is that the representation of 19th century Britain was farcical.

 

Only if you let it bother you.

 

It's hardly a farce that modern british performers, regardless of ethnicity, celebrate part of their nation's history.

 

Should all the Greeks in 2004 have gone home because their bloodlines had been contaminated by the Turkish Ottoman invaders?

Posted
So, to clarify. Are you saying that Black britains cannot publicly celebrate their nationality and the history involved?
But they’re not "celebrating" it. They're actors/performers, paid to take part in a show, which is supposedly an historical representation of a particular period of British history, but is instead distorted to fit in with ridiculous PC pressure. It's not like the "multi-cultural" make-up of this country hasn't been well represented throughout the rest of the show.
Posted
But they’re not "celebrating" it. They're actors/performers, paid to take part in a show, which is supposedly an historical representation of a particular period of British history, but is instead distorted to fit in with ridiculous PC pressure. It's not like the "multi-cultural" make-up of this country hasn't been well represented throughout the rest of the show.

 

Yes, it's just like reading a history book.

Posted
No it hasn't. Please, again, for the sake of clarity, explain why people of different ethnicity to the indigenous populace who have become naturalised residents and part of our society celebrating the nation's history has distorted it....

 

I wasn't aware that someone of Caribbean/African extraction from a (possibly...) third generation Afro-British family doing a dance interpretation of the Industrial revolution, a key event in his nation's history, has distorted it...

 

Ooooo you snuck that one in quick ;)........did you realize that i was looking back at your posts to see where I was trying to pick you up on?

 

It doesn't really matter because we're probaby miles apart on our personal view points....i do respect yours though Colinjb.

Posted
But they’re not "celebrating" it. They're actors/performers, paid to take part in a show, which is supposedly an historical representation of a particular period of British history, but is instead distorted to fit in with ridiculous PC pressure. It's not like the "multi-cultural" make-up of this country hasn't been well represented throughout the rest of the show.

 

So again, should we have bared performers a chance to be employed based on race?

 

It's not PC ****** if the performing companies have a diverse membership. And we have no method to prove otherwise, especially considering that locals will more then likely have been employed for this purpose.

Posted
Well I enjoyed it' date=' this bits gonna be boring though[/quote']

 

And the cauldron lighting isn't for another 1hr 20

Posted
is instead distorted to fit in with ridiculous PC pressure. It's not like the "multi-cultural" make-up of this country hasn't been well represented throughout the rest of the show.

 

The perfomers are probably a representative ethnic makeup of young Londoners. If the games ever get held in the Scilly Isles no doubt the show will look different.

Posted
So again, should we have bared performers a chance to be employed based on race?

 

It's not PC ****** if the performing companies have a diverse membership. And we have no method to prove otherwise, especially considering that locals will more then likely have been employed for this purpose.

Because they look nothing like the people from the period of time they're supposedly re-creating. I believe it is the reason that acting is one of the few industries you can legally 'discriminate' on the basis of race for that very obvious, practical reason.
Posted

So let's have a show of hands of those who are loving it. So far we've got BTF, SaintAndy666, Colinjb and thedelldays. Anyone else?

Posted
Because they look nothing like the people from the period of time they're supposedly re-creating. I believe it is the reason that acting is one of the few industries you can legally 'discriminate' on the basis of race for that very obvious, practical reason.

 

It would be seriously bloody pettit though.

 

Where is the practical benefit in descriminating at an Olympic Opening ceremony? An event which will be abstract and celebratory of the nation as a whole rather then aiming for painstaking historic accuracy. Not to mention the whole ethos/spirit of the games in the first place.....

Posted
So let's have a show of hands of those who are loving it. So far we've got BTF, SaintAndy666, Colinjb and thedelldays. Anyone else?

 

It has been great overall. Some awful early moments but I got into it. It was a lot fresher and original and much less hackneyed retro than I feared

Posted

Amazing how a global celebration of all humans around the world has got the racists riled up on this forum. As well as the sexists, homophobes and other types of bigot.

 

:lol:

Posted
Bloody hell, look at the size of the Cuban flag bearer

 

Nobody is watching it now. It needs wogan doing the commentary to liven it up.

Posted
The crowd, have they been briefed to ge certain colours at a specific time? Or are they wearing something reflective?

 

Apparently they've all got handsets that are computer generated (so the commentators said). Something like 40 days to wire up the stadium.

Posted
The crowd, have they been briefed to ge certain colours at a specific time? Or are they wearing something reflective?

 

They got some sort of screen they're holding which are all atched to a central control system. Very clever and innovative.

Posted
The crowd, have they been briefed to ge certain colours at a specific time? Or are they wearing something reflective?

 

The have this led gizmo which can be controlled wirelessly to change the colour. Actually very cool IMO.

Posted
Apparently they've all got handsets that are computer generated (so the commentators said). Something like 40 days to wire up the stadium.

 

A mass electrocution is on the cards then. I might just watch some more.

Posted
It would be seriously bloody pettit though.

 

Where is the practical benefit in descriminating at an Olympic Opening ceremony? An event which will be abstract and celebratory of the nation as a whole rather then aiming for painstaking historic accuracy. Not to mention the whole ethos/spirit of the games in the first place.....

Becuase it isn't discrimination. You wouldn't expect a white person to play Nelson Mandela in a story of his life would you?
Posted
But they’re not "celebrating" it. They're actors/performers, paid to take part in a show, which is supposedly an historical representation of a particular period of British history, but is instead distorted to fit in with ridiculous PC pressure. It's not like the "multi-cultural" make-up of this country hasn't been well represented throughout the rest of the show.

 

They'll be letting blacks compete in the games next! Tut.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...