Jump to content

Dune banned


Turkish

Recommended Posts

WTF?!! I see the mods have got their finger over the lock and infraction keys again. Lots of threads being locked on the main board for no real reason with the Pompey v gib thread locked and moved to the takeover thread despite it having fick all to do with the takeover. Not all of us want to read thorough pages and pages of business bollix and we just want to take the p*ssoutof Pompey being dicked by a country smaller than the capacity of SMS. Dune seems to be part of this current crackdown. Ridiculous, no dissenting voices on here. FFS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as I know it's a 24 hour ban only for having a mini melt down and posting threads containing infraction messages etc.

There were a couple of deleted threads as well (not just locked ones).

 

Also, despite you thinking we do nothing except wait on here to lock a thread or hand out an infraction, one of the reasons Dune was given this ban was so that the mods didn't have to clear away the toys he threw out of his pram over a friday night/saturday afternoon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chalet gave me an infraction for copying and pasting from another website (even though the copy and paste was his infraction message from here) so he then reversed it and gave an infraction for starting a locked thread complaining about the pettyness of locking a perfectly reasonable thread. He'll probably infract this too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as I know it's a 24 hour ban only for having a mini melt down and posting threads containing infraction messages etc.

There were a couple of deleted threads as well (not just locked ones).

 

Also, despite you thinking we do nothing except wait on here to lock a thread or hand out an infraction, one of the reasons Dune was given this ban was so that the mods didn't have to clear away the toys he threw out of his pram over a friday night/saturday afternoon.

 

What are you on about Jeff?

 

The threads were deleted because I made a valid point and Chalet simply could not have that. This followed the pathetic decision to lock the thread about the sun article simply because the mod who locked it didn't want it to be discussed. Can you explain why the discussion of that thread wasn't allowed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chalet gave me an infraction for copying and pasting from another website (even though the copy and paste was his infraction message from here) so he then reversed it and gave an infraction for starting a locked thread complaining about the pettyness of locking a perfectly reasonable thread. He'll probably infract this too.

 

You received an infraction for re-opening a thread that had been closed, and got an infraction.

 

You then moaned about said infraction, by opening a new thread, second infraction.

 

Apologies for getting the class of infraction wrong, I reversed and corrected as noted.

 

I see no reason to infraction you for the post above.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You received an infraction for re-opening a thread that had been closed, and got an infraction.

 

You then moaned about said infraction, by opening a new thread, second infraction.

 

Apologies for getting the class of infraction wrong, I reversed and corrected as noted.

 

I see no reason to infraction you for the post above.

 

So explain why you locked The Sun article thread.

 

http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/showthread.php?39064-more-disrespect-from-the-mods!

 

There was no explanation here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You received an infraction for re-opening a thread that had been closed, and got an infraction.

 

You then moaned about said infraction, by opening a new thread, second infraction.

 

Apologies for getting the class of infraction wrong, I reversed and corrected as noted.

 

I see no reason to infraction you for the post above.

 

What's wrong with opening a thread about infractions? The problem with you mods is that when you're dishing out infractions they are unchallengeable. I've sent PMs in the past challenging infractions on got either no reply or an obtuse one. For example one Jimmy D gave me a few weeks ago because he took a personal dislike to a comment I'd made which no other board user would have any idea whait was about. If you decided on a whim to start giving them out then as PAYING users or customers we surely have every right to challenge them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's wrong with opening a thread about infractions? The problem with you mods is that when you're dishing out infractions they are unchallengeable. I've sent PMs in the past challenging infractions on got either no reply or an obtuse. For example one Jimmy D gave me a few weeks ago because he took a personal dislike to a comment I'd made which no other board user would have any idea whait was about. If you decided on a whim to start giving them out then as PAYING users or customers we surely have every right to challenge them.

 

I don't think he liked everyone seeing how absurd the original infraction was. Like you say not everyone is interested in the long winded pompey takeover thread (renamed by Chalet I might add because the original title wasn't deemed suitable despite it being perfectly fine) and the said takeover thread wasn't even appropriate for the discussion of the game anyway. Of course there's the heinous crime of posting a pfc thread in the saints sub forum tut tut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't lock it, so not fair of me to speculate.

 

 

who did (is it top secret - i notice whoever did deliberately didn't close it with usual last word on the subject) and why can't you speculate? Aren't you allowed an opinion?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think he liked everyone seeing how absurd the original infraction was. Like you say not everyone is interested in the long winded pompey takeover thread (renamed by Chalet I might add because the original title wasn't deemed suitable despite it being perfectly fine) and the said takeover thread wasn't even appropriate for the discussion of the game anyway. Of course there's the heinous crime of posting a pfc thread in the saints sub forum tut tut.

 

Errm, wasnt me who renamed the Skate thread either, but don't let the facts get in the way of a good old rant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

who did (is it top secret - i notice whoever did deliberately didn't close it with usual last word on the subject) and why can't you speculate? Aren't you allowed an opinion?

 

a I don't know

b and therefore it would be difficult to have an opinion (I appreciate this may be a concept lost on you)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Errm, wasnt me who renamed the Skate thread either, but don't let the facts get in the way of a good old rant.

 

Apologies for that then. I will always apologise when I am wrong.

 

So why won't you say who locked The Sun thread? Closing ranks eh?

 

(posted before i saw the above post)

 

Perhaps Jeff can shed some light and/or give an opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The mods on here have way too much power!

 

Thats why i want/need to be a mod!

 

I think this is why Baj stated they would only be given 12 before new mods were installed. This was about 24 months ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The mods on here have way too much power!

 

Thats why i want/need to be a mod!

 

If you do become a mod will you share your ITK list? Maybe put a gold star next to the posters who get things right on signing etc. Also, will you investigate the disappearance of Dog? It seems he vanished in the night, taken by the secret police.

 

If you do the above, you get my vote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you do become a mod will you share your ITK list? Maybe put a gold star next to the posters who get things right on signing etc. Also, will you investigate the disappearance of Dog? It seems he vanished in the night, taken by the secret police.

 

If you do the above, you get my vote.

 

Once appointed i will go power crazy and ban people i dont like just for larfs.

 

Where the hell is Dog will be my 1st question for the SWF owners

 

Who does own SWF?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once appointed i will go power crazy and ban people i dont like just for larfs.

 

Where the hell is Dog will be my 1st question for the SWF owners

 

Who does own SWF?

 

In that case, I'll back you. Might as well try that control F4 thing Clarke suggested, what's the worse that could happen. SWF is owned by a unique set of people that once in a conversation, never, ever, change topic or let the conversation develop. I also have it on good grounds that the site is actually completely free to run. They take all of the £5 we given them and hire Litchenstein each year for a massive shakira concert where Baj plays lead guitar and Steve takes the part of wyclef jean. I could be wrong but this is what I've been told.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How comes I run a campaign for over a month seeking informations bout dogs and nothing... and then Turkish asks bout Dune and gets an official response within like 20 minutes?

 

This smacks of prejudices against bears! Dumb mod ****s!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once appointed i will go power crazy and ban people i dont like just for larfs.

 

Sounds like fun! Think I'll do Dune and Turkish first coz they remind me too much of some of the primary school kids I teach: always trying to push the boundaries because it makes them feel older.

 

To be honest GS I'm not to sure about you, but if you promise to be good...:-)

 

Bearsy I'll probably leave: he just needs a pat on the back and a 'there, there'... :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...