Bailey Posted 14 November, 2008 Posted 14 November, 2008 Ok, lets have a thread that moves away from all the talk about off-the-field issues. What do you think the starting 11 will/should be for tomorrow? For me, I'd go with the following . . . ----------------------- Davis ---------------------- Cork ------- Lancashire -------- Pearce -------- Skacel ---------- Schneiderlin ------ Euell ----------------- McGoldrick ---------- Lallana ------------- Surman ------------------- Robertson ---------------------- Subs: Bialkowski, Perry, Wotton, Gobern, Pekhart
John B Posted 14 November, 2008 Posted 14 November, 2008 I am going to leave it to JP He knows who is fit
Roman Posted 14 November, 2008 Posted 14 November, 2008 Ok, lets have a thread that moves away from all the talk about off-the-field issues. What do you think the starting 11 will/should be for tomorrow? For me, I'd go with the following . . . ----------------------- Davis ---------------------- Cork ------- Lancashire -------- Pearce -------- Skacel ---------- Schneiderlin ------ Euell ----------------- McGoldrick ---------- Lallana ------------- Surman ------------------- Robertson ---------------------- Subs: Bialkowski, Perry, Wotton, Gobern, Pekhart Not bad at all, although would prefer Perry instead of Lancashire and maybe have DMG and Lallana switch roles during the game, as long as it confuses the opposition more than us.
badgerx16 Posted 14 November, 2008 Posted 14 November, 2008 I am going to leave it to JP He knows who is fit He won't know until Rupert tells him
Bailey Posted 14 November, 2008 Author Posted 14 November, 2008 Not bad at all. I was thinking exactly the same after I'd written that post. On paper, that's a half decent side and you'd expect us to be alot higher up the table than we currently are. Unfortunately though, games aren't played on paper!
Thedelldays Posted 14 November, 2008 Posted 14 November, 2008 Ok, lets have a thread that moves away from all the talk about off-the-field issues. What do you think the starting 11 will/should be for tomorrow? For me, I'd go with the following . . . ----------------------- Davis ---------------------- Cork ------- Lancashire -------- Pearce -------- Skacel ---------- Schneiderlin ------ Euell ----------------- McGoldrick ---------- Lallana ------------- Surman ------------------- Robertson ---------------------- Subs: Bialkowski, Perry, Wotton, Gobern, Pekhart playing DmG on the right it would leave cork to get slaughtered by TWO left hand side players from wolves..
Navyred Posted 14 November, 2008 Posted 14 November, 2008 Our problem tomorrow defensively will be dealing with Chris Iwelumo! I think JP will seriously consider putting Paul Wotton on to man mark him. I think he would probably bully Pearce, Lancashire and Perry! Midfield is fine with Schneiderlein coming back and young Lallana playing in the hole. Up front I would love to see two strikers, but think Mcg will be played wide right and Robertson as the striker. On the bench Thomson and Paterson before Gobern and Pekhart. Should be an interesting game tomorrow, David and Goliath springs to mind!! COYR
ExSt Peter Saint Posted 14 November, 2008 Posted 14 November, 2008 JP obviously sees Euell's best position as in the hole behind McGoldrick, who is undroppable from his striker's role, apparently. I reckon the team will probably be: ----------------Davis--------------- Cork----Lancashire--Pearce----Skacel --------Schneiderlin--Surman-------- Lallana----------------------Gobern -----------------Euell--------------- --------------McGoldrick------------- But I don't necessarily agree with that. I'd put Perry in at the back, if fit, and wouldn't have DMG up front as he scores very infrequently from there. Trouble is noone else who's started there has done well either.
Roman Posted 14 November, 2008 Posted 14 November, 2008 I'd put Perry in at the back, if fit, and wouldn't have DMG up front as he scores very infrequently from there. Trouble is noone else who's started there has done well either. Maybe - clutching at straws here - we need to think of the striker as a non-scoring Heskey-type of player, so that DMG can pick his runs on goal.
Kingsbridge Saint Posted 14 November, 2008 Posted 14 November, 2008 To borrow a line from Morrissey. What difference does it make?
saintrich Posted 14 November, 2008 Posted 14 November, 2008 hope we line up as: Kelvin Davis - GK Rudi Skacel - LB Alex Pearce - CB Oliver Lancashire - CB Jack Cork - RB Morgan Schneiderlin - DM Paul Wotton - DM Jason Euell - CM/AM Andrew Surman - LW Adam Lallana - RW David McGoldrick - FW Subs: Bartosz Bialkowski, Lloyd James, Jake Thompson, Bradley Wright-Phillips, Oscar Gobern.
Ivan Katalinic's 'tache Posted 14 November, 2008 Posted 14 November, 2008 GK - Davis RB - Cork LB - Skacel CD - Perry CD - Pearce RW - Lallana CM - Schneiderlin CM - Wotton LW - Surman AM - Euell CF - McGoldrick Subs - Bialkowski, Lancashire, Gasmi, Gobern, Wright-Phillips
Saints67 Posted 14 November, 2008 Posted 14 November, 2008 ----------------------- Davis ---------------------- Cork ------- Perry -------- Pearce -------- Skacel ---------- Schneiderlin ------ Euell ----------------- -Lallana ------------------------------------Surman- ---------------BWP--------------------------------- -------------------------McGoldrick ----------------- Subs: Forecast, James, Lancashire/Wotton, Robertson, Gobern. Means another change of the back four I know. Lallana and BWP to move around though someone will need to cover Kightly who, I believe, plays wide left for Wolves.
slickmick Posted 14 November, 2008 Posted 14 November, 2008 Davis Cork Lancashire Pearce Surman Lallana Schniederlin Euell Skacel Robertson DMG Would have like to have seen White instead of DMG, but he has gone out on loan. Gasmi on bench if fit.
Chez Posted 14 November, 2008 Posted 14 November, 2008 (edited) Davis Cork Lancashire Pearce Skacel Euell Schniederlin Gillet Surman Lallana DMG Bart, Perry, Mills, Thompson, BWP Edited 14 November, 2008 by Chez
saintbob40 Posted 14 November, 2008 Posted 14 November, 2008 My team........ ........................:smt031........................ :cool:.......:smt027......:drinkers:......... ..............:smt032...............:smt077............. ................:smt069.........:smt119 .......................:smt066............................ .........has attitude.
ExSt Peter Saint Posted 14 November, 2008 Posted 14 November, 2008 Actually, the team I'd like to see would line up 4-4-2 to give the fullbacks some decent cover. -------------Davis--------------- Cork-----Perry--Pearce----Skacel Euell--Schneiderlin--Lallana--Surman --------BWP--McGoldrick---------- subs: Bart, Lancashire, Gobern, Robertson, Thomson It'll never happen under this clueless coach, though.
badgerx16 Posted 14 November, 2008 Posted 14 November, 2008 My team........has attitude. I don't think :drinkers: could handle Iwelhumo, would rather have:snipe:.
saintjay77 Posted 14 November, 2008 Posted 14 November, 2008 Im going for ----------------------- Davis ---------------------- Cork ------- Lancashire -------- Pearce -------- Skacel ---------- Schneiderlin ------ Surman ----------------- Lallana ---------------- Euell ------------------ Gobern ------------------- McGoldrick----------------------
Dannyboy_Saint Posted 14 November, 2008 Posted 14 November, 2008 I would like to see us line up as: -------------Davis---------------- Cork---Svensson---Pearce---Skacel Lallana--Schniederlin--Euell--Surman ---McGoldrick---Pekhart/Robertson-- However if JP/Lowe continue to maintain there negative 4-2-2-1-1 then i expect the team to be: ------------Davis--------------- Cork--Pearce--Svensson--Skacel ------Schiederlin--Surman------- McGoldrick--------------Euell---- --------------Lallana------------ ------------Robertson-----------
Plumstead_Saint Posted 14 November, 2008 Posted 14 November, 2008 My team........ .........has attitude. LOL mine has more : ......................Kelvin........ :smt070....:smt070....:smt070....:smt070 :smt070.....:smt070.....:smt070....:smt070 .................:smt070.......:smt070.
AndyNorthernSaints Posted 14 November, 2008 Posted 14 November, 2008 (edited) Davis Cork, Perry, Pearce, Skacel Lallana, Schneiderlin, Surman, Gobern McGoldrick, Euell subs Forcast BWP Peckhart Thomson Wotton Edited 14 November, 2008 by AndyNorthernSaints
Saint Martini Posted 14 November, 2008 Posted 14 November, 2008 LOL mine has more : ......................Kelvin........ :smt070....:smt070....:smt070....:smt070 :smt070.....:smt070.....:smt070....:smt070 .................:smt070.......:smt070. With that amount of firepower we must be able to score a few. [i wanted to add a smilie here but I can only use 10 in a post...] I expect the team to be: Davis Cork Lancashire Pearce Skacel Schneiderlin Surman Lallana Euell Gobern DMG
Arizona Posted 14 November, 2008 Posted 14 November, 2008 - - - - - - - - Davis - - - - - - - Cork - - Perry - - Pearce - - Mills - - Schneiderlin - - Surman - - - - DMG - - Lallana - - Skacel - - - - - - - - - - Euell - - - - - - - - That's what I'd go for, although I am expecting to see some pointless formation with DMG up front on his own, our best goal scoring midfield threat at LB and 90 minutes of nothing but purest a*se gravy.
AndyNorthernSaints Posted 14 November, 2008 Posted 14 November, 2008 - - - - - - - - Davis - - - - - - - Cork - - Perry - - Pearce - - Mills - - Schneiderlin - - Surman - - - - DMG - - Lallana - - Skacel - - - - - - - - - - Euell - - - - - - - - That's what I'd go for, although I am expecting to see some pointless formation with DMG up front on his own, our best goal scoring midfield threat at LB and 90 minutes of nothing but purest a*se gravy. I don't think Saints are allowed to play 5 players with experience at this level in the side with our revolutionary youth approach :-(
derry Posted 14 November, 2008 Posted 14 November, 2008 ------------------Davis --Cork Lancashire Pearce Skacel --Lallana Schneiderlin Surman BWP ----------------Euell -------------McGoldrick I'm beginning to think that despite the ball skill, there is no end product from Lallana. Gobern is very lightweight. Definitely Pekart and Robertson on the bench. We have to get forward in numbers much quicker and much more importantly get numbers back goalside when a move breaks down. It appears to me that only the players immediately on the ball move at pace the rest just trot. All the players have to start busting a gut, and sprint up in support and sprint to get back goalside. This is the reason we are not getting enough attackers into the box and getting enough players back to stop the defence getting outnumbered and to enable us to give close cover rather than loose cover.
Big Ron fan Posted 14 November, 2008 Posted 14 November, 2008 I can't believe anyone includes Wotton, even on the bench!
Fowllyd Posted 14 November, 2008 Posted 14 November, 2008 My team........ ........................:smt031........................ :cool:.......:smt027......:drinkers:......... ..............:smt032...............:smt077............. ................:smt069.........:smt119 .......................:smt066............................ .........has attitude. So you've got Saint Richmond at right back, with Um Pahars in front of him. Do you think that's a combination that's going to work?
ottery st mary Posted 14 November, 2008 Posted 14 November, 2008 I am going to leave it to JP He knows who is fit Very sensible idea, John...but let us hope for the first time this season that JP can pick his own side without the intervention by our Director of Football. Go on Lowey let us see what JP can do on his own... Enjoy a good result tomorrow John...A Saints win by a side selected solely by our coach JP.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now