Jump to content

The Euro


Thedelldays
 Share

Recommended Posts

Now. Let's be honest... It is a croc of Shyte

 

Would Europe be in such a state is we still had the peseta. The franc, the mark etc etc?????

 

I suspect we will shortly have the peseta once more. And the drachma. And Lira... plus, sterling is still alive and kicking!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now. Let's be honest... It is a croc of Shyte

 

Would Europe be in such a state is we still had the peseta. The franc, the mark etc etc?????

 

I've been quite enjoying it so far to be honest. I don't think Franc Lampard could have made the tournament anymore interesting that it already has been. Mark Lawrenson is still around though on the BBC. You might have missed him if you've been watching ITV.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[video=youtube_share;TN_1mF-3JTI]

 

There aren't so many wet continentals laughing at him now. From once being ridiculed by the liberal elite as cranks, the UKIP has been shown to have right all along. What does this make the Liberal sorts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is because Lib Dems are very very very thick.

 

That's very simplistic Dune, as always. The Lib Dems like many on here maintained it was a very good idea in principle and they naively assumed that the rules would be kept to. However, the rules were not kept too and so it is lucky we didn't join at the time. Thank you Gordon Brown. It is still a good idea in principle and maybe one day after this crisis it will be done properly. Europe needs to work more together in order to combat the rising challenge of the east. I still maintain as I have said in earlier threads that a lot of the problem isn't necessarily based on the Euro, it is worldwide and bank-based, but also on individual countries who were happy to lend to countries like Greece amounts they clearly couldn't afford.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Farage has been right all along.....ALL ALONG

 

I dunno, I think Farage disagreed that it takes away currency independence from country and centralises power in Europe. I'm not aware he ever argued vehemently re: financial arguments. However, as in many European countries, at the time of adopting the Euro it was a popular idea, the arguments he deployed weren't relevant over there even if they were relevant here as obviously prevailing opinion at the time was in favour of the Pound.

 

However, William Hague if I recall correctly ran an election campaign on a promise of staying in the pound and he got stuffed so it can't have been a massive priority for people. I don't think normal people care much about currency beyond whether they can use it to feed their families and live a reasonable standard of living.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's very simplistic Dune, as always. The Lib Dems like many on here maintained it was a very good idea in principle and they naively assumed that the rules would be kept to. However, the rules were not kept too and so it is lucky we didn't join at the time. Thank you Gordon Brown. It is still a good idea in principle and maybe one day after this crisis it will be done properly. Europe needs to work more together in order to combat the rising challenge of the east. I still maintain as I have said in earlier threads that a lot of the problem isn't necessarily based on the Euro, it is worldwide and bank-based, but also on individual countries who were happy to lend to countries like Greece amounts they clearly couldn't afford.

 

What a load of pony......

 

It is not a "good idea". You can not have monetry union without fiscal union, that is the plain and simple arguement that Farage and others have always held.

 

What on earth are you thanking Gordon Brown for? He was for the Euro, he just wouldn't bend the rules for our entry, an entry that he wanted in principle (not that he would have got in past the British people). Thanking someone for not breaking the rules, is like thanking a hoodie for not mugging you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

However, William Hague if I recall correctly ran an election campaign on a promise of staying in the pound and he got stuffed so it can't have been a massive priority for people. I don't think normal people care much about currency beyond whether they can use it to feed their families and live a reasonable standard of living.

 

Only because Labour promised us a vote. Had the Labour manifesto committed us to the Euro with no vote, Hague would have won a landslide. By promising a vote, the issue went away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was not a "noble" idea at all.

 

It was all part of "the project", and the outcome of "the project" is a federal Europe.

 

This..100%. They knew that a federal Europe would not get through the electorate....so in typical Eurocrat sneaky fashion, they tried the backdoor route - The Euro was a means to an end - they expected it to run into difficulties, but they assumed imminent Euro failure would convince the electorate that a federal Europe was the best solution and hence their goal would be achieved. However, they did not expect the Euro to run into the massive difficulties they now face.

 

Quite frankly, it is beyond belief that they have any credibility left at all. The years are passing by and still they insist on putting Band Aids on gaping wounds. Short term fixes with no long term strategy to solve the crisis. The Euro is effectively dead, just waiting for someone to unplug the life support.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a load of pony......

 

It is not a "good idea". You can not have monetry union without fiscal union, that is the plain and simple arguement that Farage and others have always held.

 

What on earth are you thanking Gordon Brown for? He was for the Euro, he just wouldn't bend the rules for our entry, an entry that he wanted in principle (not that he would have got in past the British people). Thanking someone for not breaking the rules, is like thanking a hoodie for not mugging you.

 

You can't have fiscal union without political union, and to achieve political union you need dominance from a centralised base along the lines of all empires throughout history. Andy666 for all his enthusiasm is very naive to the practicalities and what they really mean. Andy is essentially supporting Imperialism, which in this instance is the creation of the 4th Reich via the back door. This is completely at odds with localism and institutions such as the welsh assembly and scottish parliament.

Edited by dune
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't have fiscal union without political union, and to achieve political union you need dominance from a centralised base along the lines of all empires throughout history. Andy666 for all his enthusiasm is very naive to the practicalities and what they really mean. Andy is essentially supporting Imperialism, which in this instance is the creation of the 4th Reich via the back door. This is completely at odds with localism and institutions such as the welsh assembly and scottish parliament.

 

You've never heard of the United States then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly.

 

This is what the "project" is. A United States of Europe.

 

My point being, Ducky, that the US is riven by the same kinds of tensions as the EU. ''States' Rights" has been a hot-button legal issue since the American Civil War, and states in the South especially still fiercely guard their distance from the Federal government.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't have fiscal union without political union, and to achieve political union you need dominance from a centralised base along the lines of all empires throughout history. Andy666 for all his enthusiasm is very naive to the practicalities and what they really mean. Andy is essentially supporting Imperialism, which in this instance is the creation of the 4th Reich via the back door. This is completely at odds with localism and institutions such as the welsh assembly and scottish parliament.

 

I do not support imperialism. That is what you seem to support half the time though with your fawning over 'the Empire'. I do not support any further integration without a referendum and I fully support an in out referendum. Everything must be done at the will of the people at all times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not support imperialism. That is what you seem to support half the time though with your fawning over 'the Empire'. I do not support any further integration without a referendum and I fully support an in out referendum. Everything must be done at the will of the people at all times.

 

What is your thoughts on the closer political union we have seen since the vote on the common market? I consider it a disgrace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is your thoughts on the closer political union we have seen since the vote on the common market? I consider it a disgrace.

 

I don't oppose the EU in its current form. It's not perfect, but nothing is, especially an institution of that size. I think now is the time for an in/out vote(in a few years time - say once the immediate crisis is over - say 2016) just to settle the argument.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My point being, Ducky, that the US is riven by the same kinds of tensions as the EU. ''States' Rights" has been a hot-button legal issue since the American Civil War, and states in the South especially still fiercely guard their distance from the Federal government.

 

Nonsense, there is a huge difference between States in the Union wanting to "guard their distance" and sovereign Countries forcing their peoples into a Federal Europe by the back door.

 

If you think the tensions between the Greeks and the EU are the same as between the federal Government and Mississippi you are wrong.

 

The people in Mississippi had a vote in their presidental elections, the Greeks did not, yet appear to have ended up with Angela Merkel running their finances.

 

Last time I looked USA was one Country and the EZ was 17 Countries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't oppose the EU in its current form. It's not perfect, but nothing is, especially an institution of that size. I think now is the time for an in/out vote(in a few years time - say once the immediate crisis is over - say 2016) just to settle the argument.

 

I didn't ask you that. How would you feel if you had been alive to vote to stay in the common market and then saw that vote used by politicians as a green light to do what they liked in the last thirty years? It isn't right that we have got to the situation that we have without any consultation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nonsense, there is a huge difference between States in the Union wanting to "guard their distance" and sovereign Countries forcing their peoples into a Federal Europe by the back door.

 

If you think the tensions between the Greeks and the EU are the same as between the federal Government and Mississippi you are wrong.

 

The people in Mississippi had a vote in their presidental elections, the Greeks did not, yet appear to have ended up with Angela Merkel running their finances.

 

Last time I looked USA was one Country and the EZ was 17 Countries.

 

You're drifting as ever off the point. Read Dune's original little gem - my response was to that: the idea that you can't have fiscal union without political union, and that means 'dominance from a centralised base'. The US has fiscal union with constitutional checks and balances between federal and state governments, and there are constant tensions between the two (hence the immigration controversy, to give a present-day example). The whole Tea Party movement is about states' rights over the feds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't ask you that. How would you feel if you had been alive to vote to stay in the common market and then saw that vote used by politicians as a green light to do what they liked in the last thirty years? It isn't right that we have got to the situation that we have without any consultation.

 

Not only that, but we were specifically told that it would not happen. It was a Trading bloc, nothing more nothing less, that's what we were told. Grocer Heath lied to us, and the establishment have been lieing ever since.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...