Jump to content

New Goalkeeper


kwsaint

Recommended Posts

Now that Bialkowski has been released, and presumably Forecast would also have gone if he wasn't on such a long contract, who do you think that we will get in?

 

Your thoughts?

 

Hahnemann and Craig Gordon have both been released, Fabianski is second choice at Arsenal (though I should think wages would be an issue) and Scott Carson (?) is playing in Turkey and might possibly be interested.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IF KELVIN IS DEPRIVED OF HIS TOP FLIGHT CHANCE?!?!

 

IF!??!

 

This shouldn't even be on our minds. That man had the chance of the top flight when we were going under but turned it down because he wanted to have a crack at it with us. He's been our most consistent player for 5 years. I don't care who we get in, we could get in the best goalkeeper in the world for all I care (and because I don't particularly follow the foreign game, I don't really know who that is) Kelvin would STILL be our number one. He deserves this more than any other player from any of the three sides promoted and we don't even know who one side is yet.

 

No room for sentiment in football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok guys... I got his age wrong, (somehow).

 

I wasn't criticisng him, I think he's good, and I recall he was a bit special - even as a teenager...but the likes of Hart come only a few times in a decade.

Peter Shilton was a teenager when he took over from Gordon Banks, but how many U-30 keepers have made it big time in the last 10 years? - compared that is to the number of keepers overall - not so many I would think.

 

I still maintain an experienced keeper is always preferable over young, untried talent (at least as a goalie.) I expect Saints to sign one Over 30 keeper and a third younger man (we are not discussing Fourpast LOL--on this thread - are we ?)

Edited by david in sweden
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No room for sentiment in football.

 

Disagree, I don't think it would be great for team moral if we just dumped the players that got us promoted and brought in 11 new first teamers. There has to be a balance between adding quality and keeping the nucleus of the side that won the right to play at a higher level.

 

The team got promoted because they are too good for Championship football. Kelvin was the best keeper in the division. I don't think it would be great management to dump him on the bench for someone who is supposedly better because they have a high price tag.

 

I would bring in a top quality keeper but Kelvin would start as No1. Unless of course there is an obvious gulf in class.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Disagree, I don't think it would be great for team moral if we just dumped the players that got us promoted and brought in 11 new first teamers. There has to be a balance between adding quality and keeping the nucleus of the side that won the right to play at a higher level.

 

The team got promoted because they are too good for Championship football. Kelvin was the best keeper in the division. I don't think it would be great management to dump him on the bench for someone who is supposedly better because they have a high price tag.

I would bring in a top quality keeper but Kelvin would start as No1. Unless of course there is an obvious gulf in class.

 

Whoever we bring in, I absolutely can't see that it would be done on a "No. 1, No. 2" basis. It will surely be that we bring in a keeper and all talk will be about competition for the first team place. So, with that in mind, it would be Kelvin's place to lose. And there's always the factor that any new keeper may need some time to settle in (as de Gea did at Man United) so it would be a bit stupid to label the new keeper as the new number 1 only to then revert to last year's first choice.

 

It would be crazy to sign a new keeper just as a No. 2, but equally so to deprive KD of the chance to make the spot his own. I think we'll get a keeper equal to or better than KD, but he'll have to earn his place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whoever we bring in, I absolutely can't see that it would be done on a "No. 1, No. 2" basis. It will surely be that we bring in a keeper and all talk will be about competition for the first team place. So, with that in mind, it would be Kelvin's place to lose. And there's always the factor that any new keeper may need some time to settle in (as de Gea did at Man United) so it would be a bit stupid to label the new keeper as the new number 1 only to then revert to last year's first choice.

 

It would be crazy to sign a new keeper just as a No. 2, but equally so to deprive KD of the chance to make the spot his own. I think we'll get a keeper equal to or better than KD, but he'll have to earn his place.

 

Its the back up mentality most of our fans have. People seem to think we should have 11 first team players then 11 or so back up players of lesser ability that are happy to be here in case someone gets injured. This of course is utter nonsense and you need 20 or so good players to compete for the first 11 places in every position. This goes from glovesmen through to strikers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its the back up mentality most of our fans have. People seem to think we should have 11 first team players then 11 or so back up players of lesser ability that are happy to be here in case someone gets injured. This of course is utter nonsense and you need 20 or so good players to compete for the first 11 places in every position. This goes from glovesmen through to strikers.

 

We never sign any player unless we think they can be better than what we have. They should always have to prove they are better though. I would keep Kelvin as the No1 wether we spend 10mill or 100K on a keeper. Until the new guy proves he is better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We never sign any player unless we think they can be better than what we have. They should always have to prove they are better though. I would keep Kelvin as the No1 wether we spend 10mill or 100K on a keeper. Until the new guy proves he is better.

 

Not our fans on here, oh no. All we hear is back up, back up, back up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now this is an idea. Erect a lightweight, springly pole in the goalmouth and have a defender twang it occasionally - would be particulary effective for penalties and would enable a 0-1-10 total attack option.

 

Eric Martin was class and should have played for his country. As far as I know he he never had a look in.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not our fans on here, oh no. All we hear is back up, back up, back up.

 

So we sign a player who is 'better' than what we have and he is only backup to Kelvin - how precisely does does that make sense. You intimate that Kelvin is still your No 1. If we bring someone 'better' in and they are 'better' they should play. It's no good sitting on fences where we will be playing - I think I smell a hint of sentimentality in your post which is always dangerous........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So we sign a player who is 'better' than what we have and he is only backup to Kelvin - how precisely does does that make sense. You intimate that Kelvin is still your No 1. If we bring someone 'better' in and they are 'better' they should play. It's no good sitting on fences where we will be playing - I think I smell a hint of sentimentality in your post which is always dangerous........

 

What are you on about? Read my again on this thread and tell me exactly where I have said Kevlin is my number one and we should sign someone better than him but keep them as back up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hahnemann and Craig Gordon have both been released, Fabianski is second choice at Arsenal (though I should think wages would be an issue) and Scott Carson (?) is playing in Turkey and might possibly be interested.

 

Hahnemann was massive when he played in Reading's previous promotion team, but isn't he too old now?

Schmeichel K for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt we will have heard of the guy, he will come from the unknown-like Tandari Lee-and I like it that way because they bring the enthusiasm of having to prove themselves, it's going to be an interesting bus load, I'm looking forward to it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Disagree, I don't think it would be great for team morale if we just dumped the players that got us promoted and brought in 11 new first teamers. There has to be a balance between adding quality and keeping the nucleus of the side that won the right to play at a higher level.

 

You mean like we have over the past 2 seasons since Pardew left in League One? If we can sign a better keeper than Kelvin, we should. That's really the end of the argument as far as I can tell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt we will have heard of the guy, he will come from the unknown-like Tandari Lee-and I like it that way because they bring the enthusiasm of having to prove themselves, it's going to be an interesting bus load, I'm looking forward to it!

 

I hardly think the bloke who scored the winning goal in the nations cup of the most populous continent in the world is "unknown", even if we hadn't heard of him.

 

Equally, I couldn't tell you who 95% of the Bundesliga keepers are, but they're not "unknown" and I'm fairly comfortable at least half of them are better than Kelvin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blackpools keeper got player of the season for them. Could be worth a look.

 

For me though, I love us to sign Kasper Schmeichel

 

Based on his terrible decision making for Cole's first goal in the Play-Off Final, I'd say no. I wasn't impressed with Gilks at all on Saturday and Green totally outshone him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adam Bogdan. Bolton.
Iam wasting my last post of the day on this,you dont rate Kelvin and you put that clown!!!! This was the keeper who allowed a Tim Howard kick beat him, he had more clangers this season than a 1970's childrens show.Lol.

Derry,We dont see eye to eye on keepers it seems. I am saddened that a player who has shown such loyalty to the club, who it could be said the performance at Leeds where his lone brilliance (apart from RL's goal) gave us the 3 points that ultimately was the difference. I would agree that you could point out many times when things happened that became the difference to our season, but to ruthlessly drop KD when he was superb most of the season!

I am all for getting a better keeper but he would have to earn his chance not walk straight in, as i believe the squads morale and ethics could well be harmed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Iam wasting my last post of the day on this,you dont rate Kelvin and you put that clown!!!! This was the keeper who allowed a Tim Howard kick beat him, he had more clangers this season than a 1970's childrens show.Lol.

Derry,We dont see eye to eye on keepers it seems. I am saddened that a player who has shown such loyalty to the club, who it could be said the performance at Leeds where his lone brilliance (apart from RL's goal) gave us the 3 points that ultimately was the difference. I would agree that you could point out many times when things happened that became the difference to our season, but to ruthlessly drop KD when he was superb most of the season!

I am all for getting a better keeper but he would have to earn his chance not walk straight in, as i believe the squads morale and ethics could well be harmed.

 

Bit of over reaction here Nick. Davis deserves the chance to play in the Premiership and lose his place if he can't perform provided we have competition. Bialkowski was no competition. Bogdan looked decent when he played here for Bolton and that's what I'm going on. If Davis was to be judged in the same way as you have judged Bogdan after some of the errors he has made in the past, he would be hard pressed to get in Salisbury's first team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blackpools keeper got player of the season for them. Could be worth a look.

 

For me though, I love us to sign Kasper Schmeichel

 

Based on his terrible decision making for Cole's first goal in the Play-Off Final, I'd say no. I wasn't impressed with Gilks at all on Saturday and Green totally outshone him.

 

eh?

 

What?

 

This bloke : 3574607732-19052012154917.jpg who was Blackpool's goalkeeper in the Play-Off Final, who decided to stay on his line rather than narrow the angle for West Ham's first goal, when he easily could have come out and given Cole nothing to aim at. Also hasn't particularly impressed me in most other games I've seen him play in this season, and wasn't even the best goalkeeper on the pitch on Saturday, as Rob Green was clearly better than him, making a vital early save and a few improtant blocks later on.

 

Anyone else want that clarified ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This bloke : 3574607732-19052012154917.jpg who was Blackpool's goalkeeper in the Play-Off Final, who decided to stay on his line rather than narrow the angle for West Ham's first goal, when he easily could have come out and given Cole nothing to aim at. Also hasn't particularly impressed me in most other games I've seen him play in this season, and wasn't even the best goalkeeper on the pitch on Saturday, as Rob Green was clearly better than him, making a vital early save and a few improtant blocks later on.

 

Anyone else want that clarified ?

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8uJoTe1fwbs&feature=related

 

Maybe you could claify how this goal is a goal keeping error. Look at the flight of the ball, it's a heavy touch from Cole which takes it out wide, the only angle Gilks could have come out at would have meant him likely crashing into/being crashed into by the centre half. He did nothing wrong.

 

As for Green, as the England number 2, id expect him to be better, no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is Kasper Schmeichel even that good? I know he had a massive say in Leicester getting 3 points when we played them at their ground but two of my mates are Leeds season ticket holders and they were delighted when he left them. They always viewed him as a fairly decent shot stopper but pretty poor at everything else and were shocked that a club were willing to pay £1m for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is Kasper Schmeichel even that good? I know he had a massive say in Leicester getting 3 points when we played them at their ground but two of my mates are Leeds season ticket holders and they were delighted when he left them. They always viewed him as a fairly decent shot stopper but pretty poor at everything else and were shocked that a club were willing to pay £1m for him.

 

I'm sure I watched a couple of games where Kasper was very good at releasing the ball very quickly to set Leicester up for the quick counter attack. I always find it strange when people say goal keepers are good shot stoppers like it's a bad thing. I'd rather have a keeper good at stopping shots than one that's great at coming for corners and ball distribution but isn't a good shot stopper....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He will be young, probably early 20s, with plenty of potential, ready to start pushing KD from day one, but bought with the plan to be a natural replacement one, probably before KD has stopped playing. Anything else will not meet the clubs ambition. I wouldn't be surprised if he is dutch or at least is playing in Holland. We can forget tried and tested keepers who never quite made it.

 

I really don't think NA (a former goalie himself) is likely to "experiment " with a young keeper in our first season back in the Prem.

Man U's TWO young keepers have been very inconsistent this season, and they paid out BIG money for them.

 

However, I do expect us to sign a new number 3 keeper who would meet your description (above), but Bart's replacement will be a seasoned pro. - probably a former Prem. keeper and over 30.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's because most of them are dribbling imbeciles who think real life is the same as FM12.

 

No no no, you can't slag off the spreadsheet don't you know that's what football is about & we're lucky we have such knowledgeable people when it comes to it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8uJoTe1fwbs&feature=related

 

Maybe you could claify how this goal is a goal keeping error. Look at the flight of the ball, it's a heavy touch from Cole which takes it out wide, the only angle Gilks could have come out at would have meant him likely crashing into/being crashed into by the centre half. He did nothing wrong.

 

As for Green, as the England number 2, id expect him to be better, no?

 

Watch Gilks hesitate on his goal-line and actually take a step back into his goal as Cole is waiting for the ball to drop. Any kind of forward progress towards the ball from where he was would have closed down the entire goal and given Cole no option other than a very fine tightly angled lob. As it was, he managed a scuffed clip into the huge space which Gilks left by staying put which Gilks got nowhere near.

 

And yes, you'd expect Green to be better. Which he was.

Edited by The9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watch Gilks hesitate on his goal-line and actually take a step back into his goal as Cole is waiting for the ball to drop. Any kind of forward progress towards the ball from where he was would have closed down the entire goal and given Cole no option other than a very fine tightly angled lob. As it was, he managed a scuffed clip into the huge space which Gilks left by staying put which Gilks got nowhere near.

 

And yes, you'd expect Green to be better. Which he was.

 

Mate, you are clutching at straws. Firstly, the ball from Taylor is sublime - Gilks would have been in two minds as to wether Evatt was going to make it and nod it back towards him, or if it would be coming over the top. THEN, having watched it come over the top, he is in two minds again - If Cole takes a touch I need to close it down BUT if he then hits it first time I am committed and in nomansland. He has to decide what to do in about...... 0.2 of a second.

 

He could have done nothing more than what he done - make himself as big as possible and hope for the best. It was a very good goal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been saying we should go after Smithies for some time now. Really do rate him. However he has been injured this season according to my Udders supporting in-laws. He is rated up there. If Udders don't go up next week then I reckon he would worth a bid (And Rhodes as well while we're at it)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...