Jump to content

Liverpool Approach Adkins


dune

Recommended Posts

You said they had a poor squad. How many of this poor squad would get in our team?

 

Relative to the league it has been competing in it is a poor squad and is likely to get worse as the summer progresses as they make cut backs.

 

Saints on the other hand have only just entered the league, have gained access to Premier League levels of income and are in a far stronger position to strengthen in the summer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It makes perfect sense in the context of the post it was responding to.

 

 

 

Closer to 27k actually, whilst in the Championship. Compared to Villa's 33k in the world's most high profile league with larger number's of away fans boosted the average.

 

 

 

It may well be boring. But then so is taking a counter to my points and then refusing to justify them and resort to personal insults like CB Fry continues to do.

 

It isn't contradictory or irrelevant though. What examples can you give of me doing either of those things?

 

Lets hope he doesn't compare their average of 40,000 in 2008 when they finished 6th with ours in 2003 of 30,600 as based on that he'll clear off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Relative to the league it has been competing in it is a poor squad and is likely to get worse as the summer progresses as they make cut backs.

 

Saints on the other hand have only just entered the league, have gained access to Premier League levels of income and are in a far stronger position to strengthen in the summer.

 

How many would get in our squad?

 

The rest of your post is as usual, specualation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't even provide a like for like comparison. Just their attendance last year, against our attendance 7 years ago. Brilliant. You should work for NASA, or soemthing.

 

If you hadn't noticed, Saints haven't been in the Premier League for 7 years. So it is as close to a like for like comparison as is possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you hadn't noticed, Saints haven't been in the Premier League for 7 years. So it is as close to a like for like comparison as is possible.

 

What was their attendance 7 years ago? That's the only like for like that means anything. anything else is just your own speculation, and therefore meaningless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, because that would involve actual thought rather than completely tedious and meaningless speculation.

 

what we should do is speculate now on what both teams squads will be in September, as theirs is apparantly going to get weaker and ours is going to get stronger. Then we decide who is better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TBF, Villa's comparison IS poor, as would ours be if we do not strenghten. Ask any Villa fan and they will tell you their squad is poor...

 

the difference being that most of us would probably take 16th next season if offered it. For Villa it was a disaster and their manager got sacked. What does that tell you about their squad?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

names MLG...names of who would get into our 16

 

- Saints' 16 (or 18 as it will next season) will be different to that of today.

- Villa on the other hand have just had a season in the Premier League with their squad and finished 16th.

 

As I said my "poor squad" comment was relative to that of the league they were playing in, not a comparison with the Saints squad. Saints haven't had the opportunity yet to build a Premier League squad. If anything Villa will only get weaker this summer due to their money problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, somebody is a sandwich short of a picnic putting them on the list. But then again, it's Fry, so it's really just a wind-up to get a reaction. You know how he reckons that the purpose of an internet forum is to have a laugh and extract the urine. It's not to debate anything remotely serious.

 

Sounds about right to me. To be honest "serious debating" with you and your div mates is not something I plan to do any time soon.

 

Forest was obviously a gag. Villa wasn't. MLG is, of course, a joke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

- Saints' 16 (or 18 as it will next season) will be different to that of today.

- Villa on the other hand have just had a season in the Premier League with their squad and finished 16th.

 

As I said my "poor squad" comment was relative to that of the league they were playing in, not a comparison with the Saints squad. Saints haven't had the opportunity yet to build a Premier League squad. If anything Villa will only get weaker this summer due to their money problems.

 

Backtracking quicker than an Italian Tank.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

- Saints' 16 (or 18 as it will next season) will be different to that of today.

- Villa on the other hand have just had a season in the Premier League with their squad and finished 16th.

 

As I said my "poor squad" comment was relative to that of the league they were playing in, not a comparison with the Saints squad. Saints haven't had the opportunity yet to build a Premier League squad. If anything Villa will only get weaker this summer due to their money problems.

why will they get weaker.....?

maybe they will throw up another £18m for another player...something we certainly won't be doing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds about right to me. To be honest "serious debating" with you and your div mates is not something I plan to do any time soon.

 

Forest was obviously a gag. Villa wasn't. MLG is, of course, a joke.

 

You seem incapable of a debate as you seem to think petty personal insults are a substitute to answering questions posed to you from someone that has a different opinion to that of your own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why will they get weaker.....?

maybe they will throw up another £18m for another player...something we certainly won't be doing

 

Because if you hadn't noticed they have racked up huge debts of over £100m and Randy Lerner is going down the Rupert Lowe downward spiral of throwing kids into the team early.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because if you hadn't noticed they have racked up huge debts and Randy Lerner is going down the Rupert Lowe downward spiral of throwing kids into the team early.

but..they may turn that into equity...? who knows

so, what NAMES will get into our 16 then..for such a poor squad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't believe we have got to 4 pages on the basis of a totally unsubstantiated thought.

 

Quite. Can't a mod change the thread's title? No one has given a shred of evidence that Liverpool has actually approached Adkins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because if you hadn't noticed they have racked up huge debts and Randy Lerner is going down the Rupert Lowe downward spiral of throwing kids into the team early.

 

He doesn't sound like someone who is going to let them go to pot.

 

http://www.birminghampost.net/birmingham-business/richlist/profiles2011/2011/01/23/5-5-randy-lerner-950million-900m-65233-28032443/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

but..they may turn that into equity...? who knows

 

They aren't allowed to under new financial regulations.

 

so, what NAMES will get into our 16 then..for such a poor squad

 

As I have repeatedly said, my comment was relative to the league they are in. A comparison to the Saints squad won't be relevant until either August 18th or August 31st.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Martin O'Neill left Villa because he couldn't see them progressing with the signing restrictions and selling the best players. Liverpool look as though they lack something teamwise and look like they need another overhaul. Unless somebody comes in and gets them in the top four they will be gone in the search for instant success. I think there is a bit of the poisoned chalice about both jobs. Lawrie McMenemy comes to mind with the Sunderland job. Pardew could be a target for LPL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quite. Can't a mod change the thread's title? No one has given a shred of evidence that Liverpool has actually approached Adkins.

 

Can I suggest "Bickering with a garnish of speculation" as the new thread title? Sounds classy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why did Martinez turn down Villa last summer? Villa is a bigger club than Wigan. It is also a bigger club than Saints. That does not mean to say Adkins would immediately jump ship.

 

Loyalty to Villa and close relationship with the chairman. Cortese and Adkins dont get on.

 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2011/jun/10/roberto-martinez-aston-villa-wigan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds about right to me. To be honest "serious debating" with you and your div mates is not something I plan to do any time soon.

 

Forest was obviously a gag. Villa wasn't. MLG is, of course, a joke.

 

I struggle to recall any previous time when you have debated anything that seriously. It's something you appear incapable of, because as soon as somebody begins to get the better of you, you throw your toys out of the pram and go into your usual mode of condescending, arrogant, supercilious superiority. And then your cabal of wannabe Frys join in too, so that the thread degenerates into something resembling a primary school playground.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why did Martinez turn down Villa last summer? Villa is a bigger club than Wigan. It is also a bigger club than Saints. That does not mean to say Adkins would immediately jump ship.

 

I don't think Adkins would go to Villa. He's shrewder than that. Chairman doesn't want to seem to spend money and the club doesn't seem to mind selling its better players. There are clear constraints on the potential success he might have. As for why Martinez didn't go, I suspect it's a bit of that and a bit of loyalty.

 

If you're looking to cement your reputation as a top quality manager, Villa wouldn't be your first destination.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I struggle to recall any previous time when you have debated anything that seriously. It's something you appear incapable of, because as soon as somebody begins to get the better of you, you throw your toys out of the pram and go into your usual mode of condescending, arrogant, supercilious superiority. And then your cabal of wannabe Frys join in too, so that the thread degenerates into something resembling a primary school playground.

 

You've never got the better of me, especially when you're wan king over fantasy catchment areas.

 

Anyway. Bored.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is it that everyone on here have suddenly become so pedantic... rabidly hanging on every point of MLG?

 

Its like pack mentality of a gang of malnutritioned chimps in the jungle in a desperate scavange for bananas, fighting for position to take his posts apart!

 

Take it easy chaps, we're all on the same side here, just with different views and opinions.

 

In the end of the day, he's not posting crap like 'Adkins is ****e', 'I predict saints will lose the next ten games' or 'Cortese is the Devil incarnate' hey??

 

Chill out ffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that if anything could have caused a problem between NA and NC it could be signings made by NC. Falque was signed but I understand Adkins didn't see him play until the Leicester game, and significantly never picked him again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Loyalty to Villa and close relationship with the chairman. Cortese and Adkins dont get on.

 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2011/jun/10/roberto-martinez-aston-villa-wigan

 

I don't think Adkins would go to Villa. He's shrewder than that. Chairman doesn't want to seem to spend money and the club doesn't seem to mind selling its better players. There are clear constraints on the potential success he might have. As for why Martinez didn't go, I suspect it's a bit of that and a bit of loyalty.

 

If you're looking to cement your reputation as a top quality manager, Villa wouldn't be your first destination.

 

But don't you see, Cortese and Adkins don't get on. (we have evidence of this, apparently.)

 

Adkins is bound to move to Villa because they have a brilliant squad (we know this because at least 12 players would get into our side) there chairman has lots of ambition (because he said so in some newspaper, wait, didn't our chairman also say he had ambition?) and lets not forget they are a HUGE club, (much bigger than lowly Southampton).

 

Can i just say something, why does it make Villa's squad not poor if their players can get in our lineup? It is an unfair comparison, if we kept the same squad we would undoubtedly be relegated, so why does saying 'well they can get in our side' make them not poor?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...