Jump to content

England Squad


S-Clarke

Recommended Posts

I think we all have to face facts that England are not as good as we like to think they are.

 

RH has picked some unliekly candidates for his squad but tbf those 'tried & tested' players most people think should be in the squad but aren't, have on the whole failed to impress in an England shirt. (I can't remember the last time I saw England and thought Rio Ferdinand, Micah Richards, Adam Johnson or Michael Carrick were outstanding)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we all have to face facts that England are not as good as we like to think they are.

 

RH has picked some unliekly candidates for his squad but tbf those 'tried & tested' players most people think should be in the squad but aren't, have on the whole failed to impress in an England shirt. (I can't remember the last time I saw England and thought Rio Ferdinand, Micah Richards, Adam Johnson or Michael Carrick were outstanding)

 

A Half fit Ferdinand is 3 times the player Kelly will ever be, how you can even try to justify Kelly's selection over him is just ridiculous.

 

Richards is still only 23 and has only played for England 13 times, so I wouldn't really call that 'tried and tested'.

 

Johnson like Richards is still young (24) and has only played for England 11 times. Downing is picked ahead of Johnson and he yet he is older has played 34 times and scored zero goals for England which I believe fits into the 'tried and tested' argument.

 

Carrick I have to agree with you, however I think anyone with any footballing knowledge can see that he is easily better than Jordon bloody Henderson who has looked absolutely woeful at Liverpool.

 

Basically Hodgson's reasons for his selections are laughable and to see the likes of Kelly, Henderson, Carroll and Downing ahead of Ferdinand, Richards, Johnson, Carrick, Crouch and even Holt is just ludicrous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A Half fit Ferdinand is 3 times the player Kelly will ever be, how you can even try to justify Kelly's selection over him is just ridiculous.

 

Richards is still only 23 and has only played for England 13 times, so I wouldn't really call that 'tried and tested'.

 

Johnson like Richards is still young (24) and has only played for England 11 times. Downing is picked ahead of Johnson and he yet he is older has played 34 times and scored zero goals for England which I believe fits into the 'tried and tested' argument.

 

Carrick I have to agree with you, however I think anyone with any footballing knowledge can see that he is easily better than Jordon bloody Henderson who has looked absolutely woeful at Liverpool.

 

Basically Hodgson's reasons for his selections are laughable and to see the likes of Kelly, Henderson, Carroll and Downing ahead of Ferdinand, Richards, Johnson, Carrick, Crouch and even Holt is just ludicrous.

 

SAF said that Rio was incapable of playing 3 games in quick succession, perhaps Rio should tweet Sir Alex asing him to keep his nose out of England selections.

 

Carrick refused to go on the stand by list, so once there were drop outs Woy could hardly turn to him.

 

As for Richards, I rate him, but Capello and Woy clearly dont and I think they know a bit more about it than us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming Ferdinand has talked himself out of contention, would Ryan Shawcross be the next centre half in line? Solid and underrated because Stoke are percieved as synonymous with alehouse football. Stoke would have gone down by now if they were ****e and as one of their key players, I think he deserves recognition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...