Jump to content

England Squad


S-Clarke

Recommended Posts

How the hell do Downing and Carroll make the squad. Lennon should have been in for Downing, and Crouch/Holt even Sturridge for Carroll.

 

I can't believe that Richards is not included as well. Yes, he may not the be the best defender positionally but then how can you justify Johnson's place? He is one of the worst right backs to have played for England, just look at how Germany ripped him apart in the World Cup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Disappointing usual tired old faces. The likes of Downing who is quite frankly dreadful! Milner who can't get a game at City. Johnson is he really the best we have at right back? Both Gerrard & Lampard. He has missed a big opportunity here to bloody a squad for the World cup, he would have had this tournament for free, with a great chance experiment. By going down this route he has wasted the chance. The 2 bright spots are Ruddy & AOC. I just hope that Ferdinand being left out is purely down to football reasons!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rubbish selection, no Holt, Richards, Johnson. Downing, Gerrard, Lampard, Henderson, Carroll.

 

Different manager, same dross.

 

This. Hodgson has been brought into to maintain the status quo of shirt sales and subservience to the big clubs.

 

Dull and uninspired. England will be tonked by virtue of that strike line-up alone.

 

And Terry's inclusion at Ferdinands expense is a big thumbs up to nasty disruptive racist w*nkers everywhere.

 

I am done with England.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Disappointing usual tired old faces. The likes of Downing who is quite frankly dreadful! Milner who can't get a game at City. Johnson is he really the best we have at right back? Both Gerrard & Lampard. He has missed a big opportunity here to bloody a squad for the World cup, he would have had this tournament for free, with a great chance experiment. By going down this route he has wasted the chance. The 2 bright spots are Ruddy & AOC. I just hope that Ferdinand being left out is purely down to football reasons!

 

Yep, expectations were low for this tournament, he could have started working on the WC quals in autumn.

 

Idiot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone on BBC site said Jordan Rhodes deserves a spot more than Carroll.

 

I'm not sure whether to start with the fact he's a league 1 striker, or the fact that he's Scottish. It's up there with my dad saying england were stupid for not picking Dwight Yorke.

 

Someone rang in to talksport a few weeks ago saying its about time he got an England call up. The fellas on there did a very good job of winding the caller up and letting him make an arse of himself before telling him he was Scottish. Was very funny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think some of you are overreacting to the squad, to be honest. Guys like Gerrard and Lampard are proven top class players and would be picked by every manager going. Same with John Terry. Do people really rate people like Phil Jones and Chris Smalling as better footballers than John Terry? If so, thank god you aren't managing England!

 

Lampard and Gerrard will (and in my opinion, both should) start the first game. The crucial difference between them starting now and them starting in previous years is the formation. With only 4 strikers, it looks as if we're set to go with 4-3-3/4-5-1. With a 4-4-2 they are too similar to both play in central midfield. However, in a 4-5-1, Gerrard can play just ahead, behind a front man, and Lampard and Parker can play in the middle (a pairing who compliment each other well). I really believe that 3 can cause teams a lot of problems.

 

I'd liked to have seen Carrick involved. I'd have had him in for Downing and perhaps Richards in for Phil Jones, but it's unlikely any of those players would play a big part anyway. Just squad players. The "standby" players are clearly a collection of youngsters who, if called up, won't play any part if they do get the call. I don't think people should read too much into that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really thought with a Parker/Carrick combination England for once had the basis of a solid midfield, but again they've fcked it. And when it fails, it'll be 'not good enough, grass roots blah blah'. All seems irrelevant when you ignore your best players.

 

I agree with you there. I have always thought Carrick was an excellent Footballer. Perfect for international football. he is great on the ball, retains it well and rarely gives it away. I've thought for a long time Englands best formation was 4-2-3-1 with Carrick and Parker as the two - two wingers and Gerrard or Lampard in the middle behind Rooney. It's be fluid, full of pace and power up front and players that can actually play football and keep the damn ball when we need to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with you there. I have always thought Carrick was an excellent Footballer. Perfect for international football. he is great on the ball, retains it well and rarely gives it away. I've thought for a long time Englands best formation was 4-2-3-1 with Carrick and Parker as the two - two wingers and Gerrard or Lampard in the middle behind Rooney. It's be fluid, full of pace and power up front and players that can actually play football and keep the damn ball when we need to.
Agreed, would be a decent set-up for international football that. As said by others, f**k knows how Downing is involved and Henderson is even standby. Crouch should also be involved.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think some of you are overreacting to the squad, to be honest. Guys like Gerrard and Lampard are proven top class players and would be picked by every manager going. Same with John Terry. Do people really rate people like Phil Jones and Chris Smalling as better footballers than John Terry? If so, thank god you aren't managing England!

 

Terry is a great individual player, but many of his England team mates have had enough of him because of his non-footballing proclivities, such as chick-nicking and ye olde racism.

 

Was apparently given the cold shoulder at the last set of friendlies. Would rather have a lesser player in a more united team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been advocating a Parker, Wilshere, Carrick midfield for years but it looks as if we will have to settle for another inept performance from a group of midfielders who are at best past-it, cumbersome and fail to get even the basics right. Those 3 could have been our Xavi, Iniesta and Senna.

 

Henderson and Downing wtf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stunned at Downing being called up, I think he's utter utter ****. As he's proven all year.

 

His best game came against championship opposition, which I think tells you all you need to know.

 

I hope he's barley used.

 

Pleased for OX, good player. Not just pace but great technical ability and awareness. He's kind of a wild-card for us as not alot will know too much about him, so as long as we play him, we'll get positives results from this IMO.

 

The midfield looks ploddy though, not much dynamism in there. I'd have not taken both Parker and Barry, both similar. I'd have gone with Carrick and Parker IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone else not really rate Welbeck either?

 

I don't think he's great, he's made to look better as he's got Nani/Rooney/Giggs around him - but he's a pretty average player in terms of his all-round game. He seems a decent finisher though when he gets an opportunity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there must something a miss with Richards

 

Mancini stops playing him

excluded from England

and now Martin Kelly has been brought in as cover for the next game ahead of him.

 

there HAS to be more than we know to this

 

Apparently it's his positional sense and that he tires easily. Never seen that myself but never watched him enough to have a real view.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that the BBC had to have a "Who is Jack Butland?" feature on their website says it all. It is right up there with the bizzare decision to take Walcott all those years ago. A kick in the teeth for any other up and coming English goalkeeper. Might as well take Kelvin Davis- at least he's played at Championship level!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that the BBC had to have a "Who is Jack Butland?" feature on their website says it all. It is right up there with the bizzare decision to take Walcott all those years ago. A kick in the teeth for any other up and coming English goalkeeper. Might as well take Kelvin Davis- at least he's played at Championship level!

 

And Premiership level... albeit not that well but that was a long time ago.

 

I just can't get my head around their decision to take this Butland fella. Even without my bias towards Saints, I can't understand how they decided he's a better keeper than Kelvin Davis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just can't get my head around their decision to take this Butland fella. Even without my bias towards Saints, I can't understand how they decided he's a better keeper than Kelvin Davis.

 

Strikes me a decision a club manager would make - 'one for the future', 'develop him', 'give the lad some experience'. Hodgson needs to get into the international team mentality quickly. Its all about the current best players and the ones who might replace them now - not maybe at some point 10 years down the line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No Lampard then, whatever people say that's a huge blow. A very good player who is a winner.

 

Doubt he'll ever go to a tournament again with England, so personally it must be awful for him.

 

Henderson replacing him. Nuff said. Such a non-event of a football player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Martin Kelly over Micah Richards? :lol:

 

Martin Kelly was in the standby squad though, not Micah. He only has the standby squad to choose from, so his selections from a week or so ago are now starting to look even more silly.

 

Apparently Terry is also on the verge of being out, as he has a 2nd scan to confirm next week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish Rio F would just STFU.

 

I think he's entitled to feel a bit miffed. After the initial squad announcement, Hodgson made a neutral announcement citing that Rio's exclusion was for footballing reasons, specifically countering questions that the bad feeling between the players was the reason for the exclusion.

 

We've lost another centre-back, and Martin Kelly is taking a berth that Rio could have been in. How many club managers would select Kelly ahead of Ferdinand? The truth is that Hodgson knows he can't have both in the team, and has made a decision in Terry's favour.

 

Rio's getting dropped because his brother is the complainant in the Terry racism case. It's actually a pretty sensible decision; the potential risk of disharmony is too great. It's just not one that is politically easy to utter out loud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...