dune Posted 2 May, 2012 Share Posted 2 May, 2012 It's pretty obvious that he was bumped off by us. Maybe he was a double agent, maybe some other reason. What do you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 2 May, 2012 Share Posted 2 May, 2012 Did he get his Tesco green points ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turkish Posted 2 May, 2012 Share Posted 2 May, 2012 Absolutely, cover up job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hamster Posted 2 May, 2012 Share Posted 2 May, 2012 Nothing to see here. Move on please. Scary ****, that's what that is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hamster Posted 2 May, 2012 Share Posted 2 May, 2012 They tried to make out he was the new Hou****indini. I read that as a polite way of saying please **** Off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint in Paradise Posted 3 May, 2012 Share Posted 3 May, 2012 Don't worry everyone as I am sure Delldays will be along very soon to tell us all that he knows what really happened but isn't allowed to say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThreeSixty Posted 3 May, 2012 Share Posted 3 May, 2012 You mean you guys don't padlock yourselves in holdalls for a sex game? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubai_phil Posted 3 May, 2012 Share Posted 3 May, 2012 The daft thing is that the whole story sounds so weird (Sad as well, but weird) I mean it really doesn't seem like a "professional" job. It sounds like a really amateur attempt at a cover up - as if the perps had never seen an episode of CSI. A few random dodgy mags scattered around and then locked in a bag? Jeez if it WAS our "boys" then it was such a poor job that it shakes any faith in them. It's almost like a double bluff, done by someone to make our boys look like amateurs. Or, maybe, with all these elf & safety rules, that's the way 007 has to work these days. Just very weird from top to bottom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seaford Saint Posted 3 May, 2012 Share Posted 3 May, 2012 Is anyone accountable? Seems as if there are people above the law. I think the media have been muzzled too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint-scooby Posted 3 May, 2012 Share Posted 3 May, 2012 So who turned the heating up to full ? Who were the two mystery people ? Why did he have £20K worth of womens clothing at his flat ? Where are the memory sticks? Whos DNA is on the holdal? Who purchased the holdal ? Dark forces not even Baj could work out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatch Posted 3 May, 2012 Share Posted 3 May, 2012 Just seems like a sexual weirdo who paid some rent boy to lock him up in bag and sod off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thedelldays Posted 3 May, 2012 Share Posted 3 May, 2012 If I was doing a cover up job, I probably wouldn't opt for a death that couldn't have been an accident or suicide. I'd have made it look like a w@nking accident. why, this is perfect really. soon it will be "case closed" as they won't have a clue who done it. if he went missing, his family will be like the mccanns ffs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viking Warrior Posted 3 May, 2012 Share Posted 3 May, 2012 the spy who literally packed his bags. There is next to no evidence as to what went on. but his land lady or cleaner who found him tied to the bed must know a few more things about him tha has been reported KNo doubt MGM will come out wth a film shortly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Charming Man Posted 3 May, 2012 Share Posted 3 May, 2012 And people used to say Spooks was far-fetched... It's quite obvious he was bumped off by another spy. Though I like to think it was done by a foreign agency. Maybe the Iranians or someone like that and we've since taken revenge by taking out a load of their agents and bombing one of their top secret nuclear sites. I should be in the film industry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Channon's Windmill Posted 3 May, 2012 Share Posted 3 May, 2012 How do you even start out to become a spy? Do you need any university qualifications? Just curious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buctootim Posted 3 May, 2012 Share Posted 3 May, 2012 (edited) How do you even start out to become a spy? Do you need any university qualifications? Just curious. They advertise in the papers now and on their website. Before you had to be approached as the 'right sort', mostly at Oxbridge. https://www.sis.gov.uk/index.html http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/4162042/Psst-Want-to-join-MI6.html Edited 3 May, 2012 by buctootim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thedelldays Posted 3 May, 2012 Share Posted 3 May, 2012 How do you even start out to become a spy? Do you need any university qualifications? Just curious. I may or may not have a friend who works in this field (not a spy as such) and he did so directly from the same job I do now. I have looked into it as they were recruiting with the build up to the olympics...but that tap has now been turned off and if anything...with the recent SDSR, they will cut personnel in the future/after the olympics.. just visit their websites...its all there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dog Posted 3 May, 2012 Share Posted 3 May, 2012 Barrymore ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Charming Man Posted 3 May, 2012 Share Posted 3 May, 2012 They advertise in the papers now and on their website. Before you had to be approached as the 'right sort', mostly at Oxbridge. https://www.sis.gov.uk/index.html http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/4162042/Psst-Want-to-join-MI6.html You can just apply on their website. I once applied for a basic £13k a year admin job at MI5. I was working for the MOD at the time and quite liked the secrecy and everything involved. I received a letter a few months later saying I wasn't being considered this time but could apply again for future roles. Never bothered again though that line of work would be fascinating. My problem is when ever chatting up a bird, I'd have to let them know I worked for MI5. A bit like I was in the SAS, I'd have to tell everyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aintforever Posted 3 May, 2012 Share Posted 3 May, 2012 I'm guessing he was bumped off by a foreign agency. He probably cracked some Russian code or something. Whoever did it wanted it to look exactly like it looked - a professional assassination . Basically a statement saying "we don't care who you are, we can find your guys and kill them and we don't care who knows". Any cover up will be M16 not wanting to look like they've been done over. I expect the code breakers at M16 are a little more careful about where they look now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dog Posted 3 May, 2012 Share Posted 3 May, 2012 He killed himself, he was a closet homo/cross dresser and couldn't live with the shame, so he hid himself in a bag a suffocated himself. There is no evidence of being bummed prior to death so case closed! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stu0x Posted 3 May, 2012 Share Posted 3 May, 2012 (edited) Dbl post... Edited 3 May, 2012 by stu0x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stu0x Posted 3 May, 2012 Share Posted 3 May, 2012 Some of you have watched far too much telly... If it *was* an assassination, why on earth do it like that? If you want it to look like suicide, you throw him off a bridge, not put him in a bag. If you want it to look like a professional hit (as a 'warning' - however ludicrous that idea is), then you poison him, or shoot him in the head - you don't put him in a bag. The ludicrous level of conjecture is based entirely around a complete misunderstanding of who the various security services are and what they do. This guy was not James Bond, nothing like. He was a maths geek. His death will have absolutely no dissuasive impact on the security services whatsoever. It would be like trying to extort the CEO of Barclays Capital by kidnapping a bank clerk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raging Bull Posted 3 May, 2012 Share Posted 3 May, 2012 I heard he holds the Ann Frank award for hide and seek! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thedelldays Posted 3 May, 2012 Share Posted 3 May, 2012 Some of you have watched far too much telly... If it *was* an assassination, why on earth do it like that? If you want it to look like suicide, you throw him off a bridge, not put him in a bag. If you want it to look like a professional hit (as a 'warning' - however ludicrous that idea is), then you poison him, or shoot him in the head - you don't put him in a bag. The ludicrous level of conjecture is based entirely around a complete misunderstanding of who the various security services are and what they do. This guy was not James Bond, nothing like. He was a maths geek. His death will have absolutely no dissuasive impact on the security services whatsoever. It would be like trying to extort the CEO of Barclays Capital by kidnapping a bank clerk. why not...in about 2 weeks or what ever. it will be case pretty much closed....and we won't know who done it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raging Bull Posted 3 May, 2012 Share Posted 3 May, 2012 why not...in about 2 weeks or what ever. it will be case pretty much closed....and we won't know who done it You also don't turn the heating up in august thus speeding up the decaying process. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dog Posted 3 May, 2012 Share Posted 3 May, 2012 You also don't turn the heating up in august thus speeding up the decaying process. You do if you're minceing around in fishnet stockings and a boobtube, high on poppers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatch Posted 3 May, 2012 Share Posted 3 May, 2012 Was he just a spy or a pen pusher? Either way its all bo!!ocks, he died in a sex game gone wrong. Like Hutchence, like Milligan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Charming Man Posted 3 May, 2012 Share Posted 3 May, 2012 Some of you have watched far too much telly... If it *was* an assassination, why on earth do it like that? If you want it to look like suicide, you throw him off a bridge, not put him in a bag. If you want it to look like a professional hit (as a 'warning' - however ludicrous that idea is), then you poison him, or shoot him in the head - you don't put him in a bag. The ludicrous level of conjecture is based entirely around a complete misunderstanding of who the various security services are and what they do. This guy was not James Bond, nothing like. He was a maths geek. His death will have absolutely no dissuasive impact on the security services whatsoever. It would be like trying to extort the CEO of Barclays Capital by kidnapping a bank clerk. I love posts like this. Completely dismissing everyone else's theories as complete rubbish, despite having no idea yourself what went on or why. How do you know he wasn't relevant to MI6? I imagine a maths geek who is very good at his job is quite valuable in that line of business. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank's cousin Posted 3 May, 2012 Share Posted 3 May, 2012 I could tell you what happened, but then I would have to kill you... ...well someone had to Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Petersfield Saint Posted 3 May, 2012 Share Posted 3 May, 2012 Barrymore ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teamsaint Posted 3 May, 2012 Share Posted 3 May, 2012 Some of you have watched far too much telly... If it *was* an assassination, why on earth do it like that? If you want it to look like suicide, you throw him off a bridge, not put him in a bag. If you want it to look like a professional hit (as a 'warning' - however ludicrous that idea is), then you poison him, or shoot him in the head - you don't put him in a bag. The ludicrous level of conjecture is based entirely around a complete misunderstanding of who the various security services are and what they do. This guy was not James Bond, nothing like. He was a maths geek. His death will have absolutely no dissuasive impact on the security services whatsoever. It would be like trying to extort the CEO of Barclays Capital by kidnapping a bank clerk. The powers that be not only are prepared to bump you off, they go out of their way to discredit you too.It is a vital too for them. Stephen Milligan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Window Cleaner Posted 3 May, 2012 Share Posted 3 May, 2012 , not put him in a bag. you don't put him in a bag. . You just might if you were planning on taking him somewhere and then sort of didn't for some reason or other. Compromised,ensnared,drugged and in the bag..then something might not have gone according to plan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aintforever Posted 3 May, 2012 Share Posted 3 May, 2012 Some of you have watched far too much telly... If it *was* an assassination, why on earth do it like that? If you want it to look like suicide, you throw him off a bridge, not put him in a bag. If you want it to look like a professional hit (as a 'warning' - however ludicrous that idea is), then you poison him, or shoot him in the head - you don't put him in a bag. The ludicrous level of conjecture is based entirely around a complete misunderstanding of who the various security services are and what they do. This guy was not James Bond, nothing like. He was a maths geek. His death will have absolutely no dissuasive impact on the security services whatsoever. It would be like trying to extort the CEO of Barclays Capital by kidnapping a bank clerk. If he had been poisoned it could easily be covered up, just like if he was shot it could be dressed up as a bungled robbery or something. The way it was done meant that it had to be an assasin, that's what they want people to know IMO. I can't see any other logical explanation for doing it that way. Just like that other Russian poisoning (the radiation one), they knew the trail could be followed back to Russia and the technology involved meant it had to be their secret service. Why not just shoot him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now