Jump to content

Matt Jarvis

Belsey23

By Belsey23
in The Saints

 Share

Recommended Posts

Charlie Wayman

Charlie Wayman

Posted
Posted
According to Fourth Official on twitter, who is usually very reliable, we have made an enquiry for Matt Jarvis. Very promising!

 

So we're getting excited about a rumour about a player from a useless team that got relegated? FFS we want to be Man City not effing Wolves

beatlesaint

beatlesaint

Posted
Posted
So we're getting excited about a rumour about a player from a useless team that got relegated? FFS we want to be Man City not effing Wolves

 

Like Lambert came from Barcelona didnt he ? ffs.

vince

vince

Posted
Posted
Matt Jarvis is originally from the Guildford area and I heard yesterday that he has bought or built a house in the Cobham area, just off the A3. Apparently he is definitely moving but his agent is playing it very coy about who he is going to.

 

He has had the house in Cobham for a while.

Tokyo-Saint

Tokyo-Saint

Posted
Posted

They train out near Heathrow I think. Was just joking anyway.

 

I am sure QPR will want to spend big but think they will probably stick with the policy of 'Big Name' signings, not sure Jarvis would fit into that category.

View From The Top

View From The Top

Posted
Posted

His agent has told Wolves he's leaving and he is going to a top flight club. That's all WWFC know at the moment.

 

Apparently those who have relegation clauses in their contracts have them balanced by release clauses.

 

WWFC want to loan players out in a similar way B'ham loaned out Foster in the hope they go straight back up.

Professor

Professor

Posted
Posted
So we're getting excited about a rumour about a player from a useless team that got relegated? FFS we want to be Man City not effing Wolves

 

Its a fair comment that Saints don't want to create a poor team by picking up average players whose Premier League experience amounts to a season or two with a relegated club; but that's not the picture with Matt Jarvis who has a pedigree going back to Wolves promotion in 2008/09 and has had an England call-up. If Jarvis can play on the right wing he could be the replacement for AOC that no one else in the squad has managed to be. Even if we don't get Jarvis, it would be encouraging to know that Adkins is looking to sign a quality right winger.

Thedelldays

Thedelldays

Posted
Posted
So we're getting excited about a rumour about a player from a useless team that got relegated? FFS we want to be Man City not effing Wolves

I know. when we went down, ALL of our players were dire weren't they...I see what you mean

Colinjb

Colinjb

Posted
Posted
So we're getting excited about a rumour about a player from a useless team that got relegated? FFS we want to be Man City not effing Wolves

 

Yes, every player that has ever played for a relegated team is useless, isn't he? Every single one.

ericofarabia

ericofarabia

Posted
Posted
His agent has told Wolves he's leaving and he is going to a top flight club. That's all WWFC know at the moment.

 

Apparently those who have relegation clauses in their contracts have them balanced by release clauses.

 

WWFC want to loan players out in a similar way B'ham loaned out Foster in the hope they go straight back up.

 

My Wolves supporting work mate thinks they are talking of holding out for 10 million.... which i reckon (hope at that price) would rule us out.

 

Most of their players have a pay cut clause, wasn't so sure about escape clause as well.

eurosaint

eurosaint

Posted
Posted
Us or Chelsea then?

 

TBF there is also a club less than an hour down the A3 from Cobham who are on the lookout for some players !

Jarvis is probably in their wage bracket but alas he may want parity with Tal Ben Haim which could prove a stumbling block :):)

Tokyo-Saint

Tokyo-Saint

Posted
Posted
TBF there is also a club less than an hour down the A3 from Cobham who are on the lookout for some players !

Jarvis is probably in their wage bracket but alas he may want parity with Tal Ben Haim which could prove a stumbling block :):)

 

 

I did think that ;)

Chez

Chez

Posted
Posted
They train out near Heathrow I think. Was just joking anyway.

 

I am sure QPR will want to spend big but think they will probably stick with the policy of 'Big Name' signings, not sure Jarvis would fit into that category.

I'd of thought Jarvis might still be classified as a big name signing for QPR. He was close to England recognition last year.

saint_bert

saint_bert

Posted
Posted
I'd of thought Jarvis might still be classified as a big name signing for QPR. He was close to England recognition last year.

 

He played in a friendly. Came on for about half an hour or so. The opponents escape my memory right now though

SuperSAINT

SuperSAINT

Posted
Posted

Just reading the SKY Sports app, there's an article about Stoke possibly moving for Michael Owen....

 

At the tail-end of the article, there's a small bit about Jarvis:

 

"Coates and Pulis, meanwhile, have also been told they will have to part with around £10m to land winger Matt Jarvis from relegated Wolverhampton Wanderers."

SOTONS EAST SIDE

SOTONS EAST SIDE

Posted
Posted
Just reading the SKY Sports app, there's an article about Stoke possibly moving for Michael Owen....

 

At the tail-end of the article, there's a small bit about Jarvis:

 

"Coates and Pulis, meanwhile, have also been told they will have to part with around £10m to land winger Matt Jarvis from relegated Wolverhampton Wanderers."

Who are Wolves owners Lloydwebber & Rice. Pantomine writers!!! FFS
rooney

rooney

Posted
Posted

I think Jarvis would be ideal for us but not at £10m. We need a pacey winger and he would be ideal for us and we must be in with a chance.

London Saint

London Saint

Posted
Posted

If we can get Jarvis for around £6-7m and Hooper for a similar amount our attack will definitely look a lot more potent and there would be enough goals in the team to stay up for sure

 

Then we would just need to sign another centre back and full back, a reserve keeper and job done! (plus another centre mid)

Tokyo-Saint

Tokyo-Saint

Posted
Posted
If we can get Jarvis for around £6-7m and Hooper for a similar amount our attack will definitely look a lot more potent and there would be enough goals in the team to stay up for sure

 

Then we would just need to sign another centre back and full back, a reserve keeper and job done! (plus another centre mid)

 

So more or less a new team except Lambert and Lallana? ;)

Raging Bull

Raging Bull

Posted
Posted
Think he'll join Fulham.

 

I don't, their after a couple of Dutch guys and aren't interested in Jarvis.

 

10 mill however (if true) is too much IMO, there are better Jonny foreigners out there for that money.

  • 3 weeks later...
Hopkins

Hopkins

Posted
Posted
Rumour is the friendly vs wolves was part of the jarvis deal.

 

Well that won't be true will it? Not least because hosting a uninteresting friendly at St Marys is of no benefit to Wolves.

sammysaint

sammysaint

Posted
Posted
Well that won't be true will it? Not least because hosting a uninteresting friendly at St Marys is of no benefit to Wolves.

 

I thought this, but Wolves fan told me this who is ITK there they heard we offered ex amount believed to be 5 mill they wanted 6 we said were pay the extra if you give us a game in pre season, money wont be announced tho as again rumour is it will be the good old undisclosed figure, only passing on info, i dont claim to know this as fact, but hes normally spot on with wolves crap.

for_heaven's_Saint

for_heaven's_Saint

Posted
Posted
I thought this, but Wolves fan told me this who is ITK there they heard we offered ex amount believed to be 5 mill they wanted 6 we said were pay the extra if you give us a game in pre season, money wont be announced tho as again rumour is it will be the good old undisclosed figure, only passing on info, i dont claim to know this as fact, but hes normally spot on with wolves crap.

 

Interesting theory, and would be great if true, but I can't see it myself.

Hopkins

Hopkins

Posted
Posted
I thought this, but Wolves fan told me this who is ITK there they heard we offered ex amount believed to be 5 mill they wanted 6 we said were pay the extra if you give us a game in pre season, money wont be announced tho as again rumour is it will be the good old undisclosed figure, only passing on info, i dont claim to know this as fact, but hes normally spot on with wolves crap.

 

Writing off 1 million for a friendly away from home? It's either nonsense or utterly moronic.

itchen_dan

itchen_dan

Posted
Posted
Writing off 1 million for a friendly away from home? It's either nonsense or utterly moronic.

 

No it says that we will pay 6m only if they give us a friendly in return for the extra 1m. I had to re read it as well!

SaintBobby

SaintBobby

Posted
Posted
No it says that we will pay 6m only if they give us a friendly in return for the extra 1m. I had to re read it as well!

 

That's even more moronic, why would we pay £1m for the privilege of playing a friendly against Wolves?

 

Would make sense if it was maybe £50K - £100K, but not at £1m - we may as well just write them a cheque.

Crazy Diamond

Crazy Diamond

Posted
Posted

The prices being banded about for him are moronic, to use the word of the day. £10 million and I dare say about £8 million of it is just because he's had a single England cap. Sorry but this guy is being far too highly rated - though I must admit that I do wonder what he can do in a team better than the load of ****e he has around him at Wolves.

 

But £10 million to see what he's like at a different team? No chance. Someone earlier mentioned £9 million for Cisse, and Newcastle's recruitment model is not a bad one at all. If it means paying way over the odds for even a hint of English potential then I'd rather be signing players from the Eredivise or Ligue 1.

Chez

Chez

Posted
Posted
The prices being banded about for him are moronic, to use the word of the day. £10 million and I dare say about £8 million of it is just because he's had a single England cap. Sorry but this guy is being far too highly rated - though I must admit that I do wonder what he can do in a team better than the load of ****e he has around him at Wolves.

 

He was very much part of both Wolves' success and failure. When things were going well for him he was beating players and getting brilliant crosses in from the byline and causing problems for opponents. That's why he got his cap and deservedly so. However, last season he was off the boil, creating little and was dropped. He eventually found some form and started to do the things that attracted admirers, but this was too late for Wolves. He must share some of the blame for their relegation.

 

Personally I think he'd be great for us. Busy, pacey, direct and genuine competition for Adam. No chance we'll spend £10m though so doubtful we'll get him. I suspect every lower and mid level Prem side will have a dip.

Thedelldays

Thedelldays

Posted
Posted
He was very much part of both Wolves' success and failure. When things were going well for him he was beating players and getting brilliant crosses in from the byline and causing problems for opponents. That's why he got his cap and deservedly so. However, last season he was off the boil, creating little and was dropped. He eventually found some form and started to do the things that attracted admirers, but this was too late for Wolves. He must share some of the blame for their relegation.

 

Personally I think he'd be great for us. Busy, pacey, direct and genuine competition for Adam. No chance we'll spend £10m though so doubtful we'll get him. I suspect every lower and mid level Prem side will have a dip.

this £10m talk is a load of guff

 

remember when we went down and lowe was full of it saying we had no reason to sell what so ever.......!!!!

of course wolves need to sell, and not just jarvis i suspect. he will go bit not for £10m...more like £4m up front with another couple of million in add ons for the other teams success, his appearances, england call ups etc...meaning a deal up to around £7m

View From The Top

View From The Top

Posted
Posted
this £10m talk is a load of guff

 

remember when we went down and lowe was full of it saying we had no reason to sell what so ever.......!!!!

of course wolves need to sell, and not just jarvis i suspect. he will go bit not for £10m...more like £4m up front with another couple of million in add ons for the other teams success, his appearances, england call ups etc...meaning a deal up to around £7m

 

Wrong, Wolves don't need to sell as very player has huge relegation clauses in their contracts and are taking huge pay cuts from this month.

 

Wolves don't want to sell Jarvis but the player wants to leave and has a clause in his contract allowing it.

Chez

Chez

Posted
Posted
Wrong, Wolves don't need to sell as very player has huge relegation clauses in their contracts and are taking huge pay cuts from this month.

 

Wolves don't want to sell Jarvis but the player wants to leave and has a clause in his contract allowing it.

is the clause £10m?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...