Jump to content

De Ridder


Matthew Le Tissier

Recommended Posts

He didn't do a great deal, but he never really gets given the ball. He's totally low on confidence though, you can tell - he was a right bubbly character at the start of the year, but he looks pretty rubbish these days.

 

Why is he a muppet though?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone needs to show him where the goal is.

 

Clean through one on one with minutes to go and decides not to shoot.

 

muppet

 

Clearly very low on confidence, which is why he did that. I really don't rate him though personally, he never does seems to do much. (although we didn't get the ball to him enough today)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone needs to show him where the goal is.

 

Clean through one on one with minutes to go and decides not to shoot.

 

muppet

 

And? We scored from the resulting corner. I take it your aiming similar criticism at Lallana for not burying an easier chance than SDR, where he decided not to shoot then dive?

 

You are a bellend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't know why you"'re all so amazed by this, told you from Day 1 that from what I'd seen of him in Belgium and then on Dutch TV he just isn't very good.The manager only uses him when he's got no other option so what Puncheon and Chaplow have wrong with them can only be supposed.

Can't understand why we will not use Falqué as an impact player at least he has some modicum of skill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lallana lost his footing.

 

And your a cvnt if you think that classy move from de ridder got us the goal.

 

At least you have cheered me up

 

Did it not go out for a corner which we scored from then?

 

Now bore off you little runt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry but putting De-Ridder on the pitch is pretty pointless if the team won't pass to him. Countless times he had acres of space to work in and he is probably the quickest saints player on the pitch yet saints players would rather pass it to someone in the centre of the pitch surrounded be blue shirts. It's the same every time SDR plays it's like the rest of the team have something against him. He could be a useful option if the rest of the team would use him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry but putting De-Ridder on the pitch is pretty pointless if the team won't pass to him. Countless times he had acres of space to work in and he is probably the quickest saints player on the pitch yet saints players would rather pass it to someone in the centre of the pitch surrounded be blue shirts. It's the same every time SDR plays it's like the rest of the team have something against him. He could be a useful option if the rest of the team would use him.

 

Absolutely. He needs the early pass in order to be effective, not a pass with his back to goal and a guy up his arse.

 

Our inability to use guys who need the ball early - and Lee is another example - is a real weakness. It makes me (sadly) think we're better off not playing them because they don't suit our style/skill set.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry but putting De-Ridder on the pitch is pretty pointless if the team won't pass to him. Countless times he had acres of space to work in and he is probably the quickest saints player on the pitch yet saints players would rather pass it to someone in the centre of the pitch surrounded be blue shirts. It's the same every time SDR plays it's like the rest of the team have something against him. He could be a useful option if the rest of the team would use him.

 

Agree but that's a result of our narrow diamond and going direct to Lambert down the middle which sucks players inside to pick up the layoffs and knock downs. Not really going to change as long as we rely on Lambert in the way we do. That's why I'd rather see SDR down the middle closer to Lambert where he will be involved more.

Edited by shurlock
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry but putting De-Ridder on the pitch is pretty pointless if the team won't pass to him.

This is so true, he played right in front of me second half and he was never given a pass he could do anything with...

Actually this being the case, it might explain a bit of guly's performances

Not a guly fan, but the fact that wing is not well served could explain why he is less effective than up front

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely. He needs the early pass in order to be effective, not a pass with his back to goal and a guy up his arse.

 

Our inability to use guys who need the ball early - and Lee is another example - is a real weakness. It makes me (sadly) think we're better off not playing them because they don't suit our style/skill set.

 

Agree we might as well have played with when 10 men when SDR came on. He is no use to us the way we play at the moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone needs to teach him when to come short for the ball and when to drive forward for the ball over the top because he makes it very hard for the player in possession. He should be coming short taking a pass from Fraser then bombing forward for the quick ball over the top but he never does it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely. He needs the early pass in order to be effective, not a pass with his back to goal and a guy up his arse.

 

Our inability to use guys who need the ball early - and Lee is another example - is a real weakness. It makes me (sadly) think we're better off not playing them because they don't suit our style/skill set.

 

Don't think it would make a massive difference as long as all the play is attracted to the centre of the pitch where Lambert is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't think it would make a massive difference as long as all the play is attracted to the centre of the pitch where Lambert is.

 

Doesn't that give us more opportunity to give De Ridder the ball he needs?

 

I think it does but that assumes we have a midfielder who can see and react to that opportunity, and I'm not sure we do. Other than Schneiderlin - if he can get forward quickly enough from his current base of the diamond/front of the back four role.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry but putting De-Ridder on the pitch is pretty pointless if the team won't pass to him. Countless times he had acres of space to work in and he is probably the quickest saints player on the pitch yet saints players would rather pass it to someone in the centre of the pitch surrounded be blue shirts. It's the same every time SDR plays it's like the rest of the team have something against him. He could be a useful option if the rest of the team would use him.

 

This. Sometimes, we're just far too slow in our build up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't that give us more opportunity to give De Ridder the ball he needs?

 

I think it does but that assumes we have a midfielder who can see and react to that opportunity, and I'm not sure we do. Other than Schneiderlin - if he can get forward quickly enough from his current base of the diamond/front of the back four role.

 

He does but that's after the second phase -after we've collected the knock down from Lambert by which time defenders have had time to regroup. If that gives anyone space it's the FBs from deep. Very different from hitting first time balls from deepish midfield into the channels. That wont happen as long as our first instinct is to hit Lambert -which, after all, is effective alot of the time..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't think he really fits our system, which is a shame, as i like the lad.

 

Would probably be more adept to playing wide right of a front 3.

 

Yep totally agree. Needs to be closer to Lambert and use his pace/directness off him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry but putting De-Ridder on the pitch is pretty pointless if the team won't pass to him.

There are times when you get the impression that Richardson does not like him, as said elsewhere, the ball goes to him when he is facing our goal with a defender up his chuff. Today SDR asked for the ball over the top and Richardson ignored him and passed it sideways for our cocking about in the centre back goalie triangle play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He needs a quality penetrating pass from midfield either down the right channel or behind the defence. Nobody in midfield can play that pass. We need a midfielder that can play in the forwards.

 

To hits those balls requires a ridiculously good midfielder-i cant think of many players in the championship let alone England that can regularly split defenses in that way. Instead what you get are balls down the channels which are either too hopeful or too flat.

As I say, the way we set up around the ball to Lambert down the middle makes us narrow unless he's peeling off to the sides.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He needs a quality penetrating pass from midfield either down the right channel or behind the defence. Nobody in midfield can play that pass. We need a midfielder that can play in the forwards.

In my view that player was on the pitch today, unfortunately with a blue shirt on. Scott Allan looks a very good prospect, maybe we can prise him away from the Baggies at the end of the season, in my opinion he is just what we need, and fits the bill well as a young player, even if not the intelligent bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone needs to show him where the goal is.

 

Clean through one on one with minutes to go and decides not to shoot.

 

muppet

 

Clearly very low on confidence, which is why he did that. I really don't rate him though personally, he never does seems to do much. (although we didn't get the ball to him enough today)

 

The way I saw that chance was he got himself into a great position, got closed down very quickly indeed, and decided a squared ball across the box was the better option in the not unreasonable expectation that we ought to have at least one striker steaming in. Think its a bit harsh to criticise too severely myself. With that wonderful thing that is hindsight, he should have shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree we might as well have played with when 10 men when SDR came on. He is no use to us the way we play at the moment.

 

So no change then as we were a team of 10 whilst Guly was out there.

 

SDR does at least offer a change of pace, and sometimes a cross from the right when he is played in.. Sadly and five games from the end of the season we know he can not start a game. So he remains an "impact sub" , but too often of little consequence

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The way I saw that chance was he got himself into a great position, got closed down very quickly indeed, and decided a squared ball across the box was the better option in the not unreasonable expectation that we ought to have at least one striker steaming in. Think its a bit harsh to criticise too severely myself. With that wonderful thing that is hindsight, he should have shot.

 

Couldn't agree more...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The way I saw that chance was he got himself into a great position, got closed down very quickly indeed, and decided a squared ball across the box was the better option in the not unreasonable expectation that we ought to have at least one striker steaming in. Think its a bit harsh to criticise too severely myself. With that wonderful thing that is hindsight, he should have shot.

 

I agree to some extent but he should have looked across and tried to pick someone out instead of just blindly squaring it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

to be fair....he rarely gets a run in the team

pretty difficult to get going with 30 mins here, 25 mins there etc

look at sharp...took a few starts to get going...

now got 4 in the last 3 games

 

It had occurred to me, but you would have thought we'd see more than we have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm afraid I don't know. Is that a loaded question?

 

I still expect more from him when he does make appearances, that's my point. Nothing more, nothing less.

I don't either but some players need to have a run in the team.....remember when joe hooiveld first signed..bit dodge to start with...sharp certainly was

GULY was horrofic to start with (another debate lol)

where as Lee looked the business

 

 

I would like to see De Ridder start a couple of games

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't either but some players need to have a run in the team.....remember when joe hooiveld first signed..bit dodge to start with...sharp certainly was

GULY was horrofic to start with (another debate lol)

where as Lee looked the business

 

 

I would like to see De Ridder start a couple of games

 

Or Josh as Nigel calls him! I said on another thread we miss Lee, don't think anyone can deny it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...